In response to mryazz's comment:
In response to royf19's comment:
In response to Drewski5's comment:
In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:
In response to pcmIV's comment:
Hey remember that time that Bill wasn't complaining/worried about the team?
It actually existed. 3 years back or so, Bill was overwhelmingly positive, and in this state his aw shucks befuddlement was quite endearing (to me anyway). Don't know what turned him, maybe Chickengate, dunno.
I saw people getting unnecessarily aggressive w/ Bill before I saw Bill get aggressive back.
Drewski -- posters now might have a knee-jerk aggressive reaction to Bill now but that was after bill started spamming the board with one negative thread after another, often on the same topick and usually making no sense.
He'll make a logical statement but use it out of context that it makes no sense to the situation he's talking about -- and that's on a better post.
Before September 2011, bill was a reactionary but he'd at least balance the negative with the good. But since then, he's decided to be just simply be constantly negative and beyond that, make no sense with his arguments.
So yeah, posters might "attack" him first, but he basically asks for it. Unless he's truly an idiot, he wouldn't consistently post the way he does w/o expecting the responses he gets.
He's not interested in an intelligent discussion. He wants to be attacked.
i still believe bill works for the BDC. either way, it's still fun to pick on him.
You think it's fun to pick on an old man, really?