Ellsbury

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from carnie. Show carnie's posts

    Re: Ellsbury

    In Response to Re: Ellsbury:
    [QUOTE] An ignorant racist, bigot, and  homophobe , who pretends to be a good Christian fighting the fight.  A solid conservative Republican, who takes on all leftist foes........ PLEASE! You are an extreme fool, with extreme views! All the groups you champion would not have a thing to do with you!!! Even the far right fringe Look here, you trolling drive-by mental midget hired shilling leftist! No Conservative ever uses the mental midget's artifice term "homophobe"! No Christain ever uses the mental midget's artifice term "homophobe"! And no Conservative ever uses the phrase "far right fringe"! The Apostle Paul, today, would be called "a homophobe", you fraudulent lunatic! 
    Posted by TrotterNixon[/QUOTE]Christain? What is that? And as far as the "Apostle Paul" goes he wasn't even an apostle. He came to Christianity, or should I say Christainty, after the Jew was crucificied.
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from notin. Show notin's posts

    Re: Ellsbury

    In Response to Re: Ellsbury:
    [QUOTE]This is essentially Jacoby's second spring training. Let's wait for a larger sample size to start judging him too harshly. softy's still bummed out about Jacoby taking Coco's job away mid playoffs 2007, then hitting .438 in the World Series (this after a .927 OPS after his call-up in Sept 2007) .
    Posted by moonslav59[/QUOTE]

    To be fair, Crisp did the same thing to Ellsbury in the 2008 post-season...
     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from carnie. Show carnie's posts

    Re: Ellsbury

    In Response to Re: Ellsbury:
    [QUOTE] And as far as the "Apostle Paul" goes he wasn't even an apostle In your captious comment concerning an obvious typo spelling error, you display your own ignorance of The Bible and the etymology of the word "apostle". Yes, Paul was an apostle.
    Posted by TrotterNixon[/QUOTE]Just when I thought we were finally getting along, you go and insult my intelligence. As far as I know etymology is a word that wasn't even invented until long after King James rewrote the bible.
     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: Ellsbury

     But, that was 2008. We were talking 2007.

    No, you were claiming "Ellsbury took Crisp's job at the end of 2007". That was false, and your attempt to spin it after being confronted by the facts of 2007 and 2008 is obvious. 

    Your reading comprehension rivals your IQ: zero.

    I clearly stated that Ellsbury took over Coco's job in the 2007 playoffs. I never said "for good" as we all know Coco played more CF than Jake during the 2008 season.
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: Ellsbury

    In Response to Re: Ellsbury:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Ellsbury : To be fair, Crisp did the same thing to Ellsbury in the 2008 post-season...
    Posted by notin[/QUOTE]

    I was fair when I posted this a few posts ago...


    Coco returned the favor in 2008 by taking Jake's slot vs TBR in the LCS by batting .450 after jake went 0 for 14. But, that was 2008. We were talking 2007.
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from nhsteven. Show nhsteven's posts

    Re: Ellsbury

    Could there be another reason, perhaps subconscious, that Softy doesn't like Ellsbury? 
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: Ellsbury

    In Response to Re: Ellsbury:
    [QUOTE]Could there be another reason, perhaps subconscious, that Softy doesn't like Ellsbury? 
    Posted by nhsteven[/QUOTE]

    It's not subconcious. softy has come right out and stated it several times:

    1) Ellsbury went to a liberal college and was indoctrinated by leftist union supporting slugs.

    2) "Jake" was handed the starting job on a silver platter, because he is a "good ole boy".

    3) Jake took Coco's job away as softy denied that Coco declined in Boston from his last Cleveland years, and that he grossly missed expectations. Coco came to Boston at age 26- primed for improvement, instead he gave us this:
    Cleve '04-'05: .299/.345/.456/.801 
    Bost   '06-'09: .271/.330/.390/.690
    Just because he called the fact that Jake would replace Coco, doesn'nt mean he never got over it.

    4) softy can't stand to be proven wrong and will seek out obscure stats to prove a player he hates is not as good as he appears to be, even if the new found stat contradicts a stat he used before on Jake or on another Sox player he hates.

    5) Jake is white: Coco is black, so softy blames racism for the change. 

    6) Jake is Native American, a category of division softy frowns on (along with many more), and one said "Jake would look good in an Indians hat".

    There's more, but this about covers the major reason softy has suggest 3,421 different Jake trades since Coco was benched in the 2007 WS, and some senial Red Sox ex player dared compare Jake to Teddy Ballgame. Softy then convinced himself that every Sox fan overvalued Jake based on a small 2007 sample size and/or the color of his skin. softy believe he is on a one man crusade to expose how the whole world is wrong about Jake. Jake is really awful, but then in the next breath, he thinks Jake and a couple blocked prospects will net us his idead of the next coming of Manny Ramirez (AGon, Kemp and now Upton to name just a few).

    (Cue softy blaming me for defending Wake against his lies and distortions.)

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from bofferific. Show bofferific's posts

    Re: Ellsbury

    In Response to Re: Ellsbury:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Ellsbury : It's not subconcious. softy has come right out and stated it several times: 1) Ellsbury went to a liberal college and was indoctrinated by leftist union supporting slugs.
    Posted by moonslav59[/QUOTE]
    Ellsbury went to Oregon State. Oregon State is not a liberal college. You must be thinking of the University of Oregon. Oregon State was formerly known as Oregon Agricultural College. It is not "liberal" in any way.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: Ellsbury

    In Response to Re: Ellsbury:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Ellsbury : Ellsbury went to Oregon State. Oregon State is not a liberal college. You must be thinking of the University of Oregon. Oregon State was formerly known as Oregon Agricultural College. It is not "liberal" in any way.
    Posted by bofferific[/QUOTE]

    Of course it's not, but you have to remember, softy called my alma mater, The University of Notre Dame (breeding ground for Condoleezza Rice and Latin American fascist leaders) a leftwing socialist college. He basicallycalls all colleges liberal, unless it's RLSL (The Rush Limbaugh School of Lunacy).
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from hill55. Show hill55's posts

    Re: Ellsbury

    In Response to Re: Ellsbury:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Ellsbury : You are adorable when you get mad.
    Posted by snakeoil123[/QUOTE]
    Laughing

     

Share