Explosions at Boston Marathon

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from nhsteven. Show nhsteven's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

    In response to BurritoT-'s comment:

     

    nhsteven I cannot even bother reading what either of you are debating but you as always sound like a jerk.

     




     

    You got that right.



    You two are made for each other.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from nhsteven. Show nhsteven's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

     Duplicate

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    In response to TV-Guy's comment:

    What about that long boring thread where you Higham are debating like two little school girls? Is that thread still alive? Why not go there and continue to  cat fight? How about the Politics thread? Too many intelligent people there for you? Liberals are intellectuals, don't you know that? That is why most college students vote Democrat.




    You of all people droning on about boring threads.

    pike some of the most successful people on this planet have little education.

    Another of the democrats grand ideas is free college education, loan forgiveness.

    Wake up dummy.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    In response to nhsteven's comment:

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

     

    In response to nhsteven's comment:

     

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

     

    In response to nhsteven's comment:

     

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

     

    In response to nhsteven's comment:

     

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

     

    In response to nhsteven's comment:

     

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

     

    In response to nhsteven's comment:

     

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

     

    In response to RSF4Life234's comment:

     

    If you say dumb things like liberals hate America then you deserve to be called dumb. As I said in my last post take your political bs and shove it.

     




     

    I didn't say liberals hate America.

    They couldn't survive in a country without a working class to leech from, they love it here.

    Like a big dog under the porch that gets a big bone after supper every night.

    I thought I said they dislike democracy and industry which they do.

    They want to be able to shove their agenda down the throats of the American public but  unfortunately congress and the constitution stand in the way. Like they did with the big cluster known as Obamacare.

    Like Bloomberg tried to do with the Big Gulp.

    Look at the Keystone XL Pipeline. Look at Fracking in NY. If the people who are now in charge in NY (liberal Democrats) were in charge the last century we would not have had Syracuse, Buffalo or the Erie Canal.

    Ugh, too dirty, a big hole from Albany to Buffalo filled with water and germs.

     



    Thanks for the accurate picture 

     

     




     

    And thanks for a point by point discussion of why my opinions are not correct.

     



    Since you said I didn't understand the 2nd amendment, how could I possiblydo that?

     

     




     

    There was no mention of the 2nd admendment in my post the one I'm referring to which is the one that you responded to.

     

     



    Go reread the thread.

     

     




     

    Reread what?

    I wrote the post you responded to.

    Don't respond to my posts with a stupid riddle, if you disagree with my points in a post tell me why you think that i am wrong or don't respond.

     



    Gosh, for one who complains about insults (let's not forget the name calling)....  go check page 13.

     

    More doubletalk & twisted rhetoric. You're now on ignore buddy; enjoy your nonsense.

     




     

    All I ask for is a point by point discussion on your response to my post:

    I didn't say liberals hate America.

    They couldn't survive in a country without a working class to leech from, they love it here.

    Like a big dog under the porch that gets a big bone after supper every night.

    I thought I said they dislike democracy and industry which they do.

    They want to be able to shove their agenda down the throats of the American public but  unfortunately congress and the constitution stand in the way. Like they did with the big cluster known as Obamacare.

    Like Bloomberg tried to do with the Big Gulp.

    Look at the Keystone XL Pipeline. Look at Fracking in NY. If the people who are now in charge in NY (liberal Democrats) were in charge the last century we would not have had Syracuse, Buffalo or the Erie Canal.

    Ugh, too dirty, a big hole from Albany to Buffalo filled with water and germs.

     

    To big and difficult for you to deal with so now I'm on ignore because you're are incapable of responding?

    I'll try to dumb down so you can be more on par in future debates.

    For now you need to be sent down to AA to hone up on your skills.

     



    More insults I see. Basically, what you say is a fabricated incoherent croc. Here's guessing you didn't even reread page 13, understand it the 1st time, or are just plain full of in large part due to losing the debate. So why would anyone want to talk or waste time with such a heretical twisted crank who spews continual garbage as an excuse for a real conversation?

    Consider yourself insulted; sometimes the truth hurts.

     

     




     

    Thought I was on ignore.

    More whining.

    Page 13?

    Why the hell would I want to go back there?

    I'm just asking why you can't present a coherent answer to my post on the definition of liberals which you seem to object to but cannot articulate why when I ask.

    To the point you put me on ignore to change the subject.

    But you probably won't see this because i'm on ignore.

     



    Maybe I missed it. Is that what you want, mydefinition of liberals? Fine, but trust me, you'll be on ignore soon after.

     

    To start with, I believe conservatism is actually a good approach in general, but the conservative approach of Goldwater & Reagan; not the twisted version that uses traditional Conservatism as an excuse for greed & plunder that panders to an elite club like we've seen the past 20 yrs.

    In fact, from that POV, W Bush, was at best, a sloppy conservative, hoisted up like a puppet by the new conservative ideology (see above).

    Until someone from the Republican party reverts to the original concept of Conservatism, largely free from Good Old Boy influence, the Republican Party is in big trouble; the populace won't fall for the current approach. They also need to keep their mouth shut (or at least tone it down) regarding women's issues, gay rights, taxes for the wealthy, gun control, defense spending, the environment, & immigration, amongst others.

    A liberal is someone, admittedly, who expects Big Government to help its citizens when necessary, stimulate the economy, & regulate commerce & other processes. They also believe in taxation as necessary to accommodate this. FDR is probably the biggest successful example, and actually the pre-WW2 military buildup was consistent with this approach; regardless, he threw a bunch of War profiteers (including friends) in jail, despite this most essential of WARs. To contrast, Bush NEVER did this, and there were some doozies during his regime.

    Recently, other issues have also latched onto both camps; some were mentioned above.

    However, Obama is not a liberal in the strict sense; he's had a recent draconian approach to SS & Medicare that has angered senior citizens. He does have socialist tendencies, which may be due to the partial success of the European (including Canada) models over the last few decades; however, this model is starting to show its warts. Regardless, socialism and liberalism, while similar, are not one and the same.

    The reality is liberals & conservatives are idealistic labels, and few are purely one or the other.



    Obama isn't a liberal in the strict sense?

    No he just wants to turn the USA into Scandinavia.

    You are too funny and hard to take serious.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from nhsteven. Show nhsteven's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

     

    In response to nhsteven's comment:

     

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

     

    In response to nhsteven's comment:

     

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

     

    In response to nhsteven's comment:

     

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

     

    In response to nhsteven's comment:

     

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

     

    In response to nhsteven's comment:

     

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

     

    In response to nhsteven's comment:

     

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

     

    In response to RSF4Life234's comment:

     

    If you say dumb things like liberals hate America then you deserve to be called dumb. As I said in my last post take your political bs and shove it.

     




     

    I didn't say liberals hate America.

    They couldn't survive in a country without a working class to leech from, they love it here.

    Like a big dog under the porch that gets a big bone after supper every night.

    I thought I said they dislike democracy and industry which they do.

    They want to be able to shove their agenda down the throats of the American public but  unfortunately congress and the constitution stand in the way. Like they did with the big cluster known as Obamacare.

    Like Bloomberg tried to do with the Big Gulp.

    Look at the Keystone XL Pipeline. Look at Fracking in NY. If the people who are now in charge in NY (liberal Democrats) were in charge the last century we would not have had Syracuse, Buffalo or the Erie Canal.

    Ugh, too dirty, a big hole from Albany to Buffalo filled with water and germs.

     



    Thanks for the accurate picture 

     

     




     

    And thanks for a point by point discussion of why my opinions are not correct.

     



    Since you said I didn't understand the 2nd amendment, how could I possiblydo that?

     

     




     

    There was no mention of the 2nd admendment in my post the one I'm referring to which is the one that you responded to.

     

     



    Go reread the thread.

     

     




     

    Reread what?

    I wrote the post you responded to.

    Don't respond to my posts with a stupid riddle, if you disagree with my points in a post tell me why you think that i am wrong or don't respond.

     



    Gosh, for one who complains about insults (let's not forget the name calling)....  go check page 13.

     

    More doubletalk & twisted rhetoric. You're now on ignore buddy; enjoy your nonsense.

     




     

    All I ask for is a point by point discussion on your response to my post:

    I didn't say liberals hate America.

    They couldn't survive in a country without a working class to leech from, they love it here.

    Like a big dog under the porch that gets a big bone after supper every night.

    I thought I said they dislike democracy and industry which they do.

    They want to be able to shove their agenda down the throats of the American public but  unfortunately congress and the constitution stand in the way. Like they did with the big cluster known as Obamacare.

    Like Bloomberg tried to do with the Big Gulp.

    Look at the Keystone XL Pipeline. Look at Fracking in NY. If the people who are now in charge in NY (liberal Democrats) were in charge the last century we would not have had Syracuse, Buffalo or the Erie Canal.

    Ugh, too dirty, a big hole from Albany to Buffalo filled with water and germs.

     

    To big and difficult for you to deal with so now I'm on ignore because you're are incapable of responding?

    I'll try to dumb down so you can be more on par in future debates.

    For now you need to be sent down to AA to hone up on your skills.

     



    More insults I see. Basically, what you say is a fabricated incoherent croc. Here's guessing you didn't even reread page 13, understand it the 1st time, or are just plain full of in large part due to losing the debate. So why would anyone want to talk or waste time with such a heretical twisted crank who spews continual garbage as an excuse for a real conversation?

    Consider yourself insulted; sometimes the truth hurts.

     

     




     

    Thought I was on ignore.

    More whining.

    Page 13?

    Why the hell would I want to go back there?

    I'm just asking why you can't present a coherent answer to my post on the definition of liberals which you seem to object to but cannot articulate why when I ask.

    To the point you put me on ignore to change the subject.

    But you probably won't see this because i'm on ignore.

     



    Maybe I missed it. Is that what you want, mydefinition of liberals? Fine, but trust me, you'll be on ignore soon after.

     

    To start with, I believe conservatism is actually a good approach in general, but the conservative approach of Goldwater & Reagan; not the twisted version that uses traditional Conservatism as an excuse for greed & plunder that panders to an elite club like we've seen the past 20 yrs.

    In fact, from that POV, W Bush, was at best, a sloppy conservative, hoisted up like a puppet by the new conservative ideology (see above).

    Until someone from the Republican party reverts to the original concept of Conservatism, largely free from Good Old Boy influence, the Republican Party is in big trouble; the populace won't fall for the current approach. They also need to keep their mouth shut (or at least tone it down) regarding women's issues, gay rights, taxes for the wealthy, gun control, defense spending, the environment, & immigration, amongst others.

    A liberal is someone, admittedly, who expects Big Government to help its citizens when necessary, stimulate the economy, & regulate commerce & other processes. They also believe in taxation as necessary to accommodate this. FDR is probably the biggest successful example, and actually the pre-WW2 military buildup was consistent with this approach; regardless, he threw a bunch of War profiteers (including friends) in jail, despite this most essential of WARs. To contrast, Bush NEVER did this, and there were some doozies during his regime.

    Recently, other issues have also latched onto both camps; some were mentioned above.

    However, Obama is not a liberal in the strict sense; he's had a recent draconian approach to SS & Medicare that has angered senior citizens. He does have socialist tendencies, which may be due to the partial success of the European (including Canada) models over the last few decades; however, this model is starting to show its warts. Regardless, socialism and liberalism, while similar, are not one and the same.

    The reality is liberals & conservatives are idealistic labels, and few are purely one or the other.

     



     

    Obama isn't a liberal in the strict sense?

    No he just wants to turn the USA into Scandinavia.

    You are too funny and hard to take serious.

     



    What a dope .... Good riddance

     

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from emp9. Show emp9's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    MSNBC: " thanks for all your help Lester Holt, but we have Andrew via Skype on the line... Who has actual information". :)

     

     

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Flapjack07. Show Flapjack07's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    Yeah, umm...anyway...

    Stay safe, anyone in the Watertown area.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from mef429. Show mef429's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    In response to Flapjack07's comment:

    Yeah, umm...anyway...

    Stay safe, anyone in the Watertown area.




    same here. been listening to the scanners for the past few hours hoping to hear anything.

    http://tunein.com/radio/Boston-Police-Fire-and-EMS-Scanner-s146109/

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    watching the boston news. Apparently two suspects,  from Russia 17 and 19, brothers. Lived together in Cambridge. One, still at large, hi-jacked a vehicle after attempting to hold up a 711, one is dead during a shootout at 1030 last night,  one police officer was shot and killed. Third family member is being sought

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from GoneToTheDogs39. Show GoneToTheDogs39's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    http://tunein.com/radio/Boston-Police-Fire-and-EMS-Scanner-s146109/

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from jete02fan. Show jete02fan's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    boy, this thread has totally gone left(no pun intended) Sealed

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    http://www.myfoxboston.com/category/262392/boston-marathon

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from jesseyeric. Show jesseyeric's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    To all my friends in the lockdown areas, please be safe ad don't mess about while this looney is out and about.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from LloydDobler. Show LloydDobler's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    Let's focus on something we can all agree on. I cannot express how much admiration I have for Boston Police and the Feds for what they're doing. Truly unbelievable.

     

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from jete02fan. Show jete02fan's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    In response to LloydDobler's comment:

    Let's focus on something we can all agree on. I cannot express how much admiration I have for Boston Police and the Feds for what they're doing. Truly unbelievable.

     

    + 3


     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    I wonder how many people in the neighborhood where this kook is lurking would love to have a gun in their homes.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from emp9. Show emp9's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

    I wonder how many people in the neighborhood where this kook is lurking would love to have a gun in their homes.



    Who's to say they don't? 

     

    Terrorist fatalities on American soil sinse 1970= 3,000(+)

    Gun violence fatalities on American soil sinse 1980= 900,000(+)

     

    So say what you want to make yourself feel better, but the facts are the facts. 

    Oh & by-the-way, NO ONE IS TRYING TO TAKE YOUR GUN AWAY.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from GoneToTheDogs39. Show GoneToTheDogs39's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    https://twitter.com/YourAnonNews

    I think the BPD EMS cut off the feed to the public, I can't pick it up now, don't know how accurate the above site is...

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from LloydDobler. Show LloydDobler's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    In response to jete02fan's comment:

    + 3


    Love the avatar Jete!

     

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    In response to emp9's comment:

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

     

    I wonder how many people in the neighborhood where this kook is lurking would love to have a gun in their homes.

     



    Who's to say they don't? 

     

     

    Terrorist fatalities on American soil sinse 1970= 3,000(+)

    Gun violence fatalities on American soil sinse 1980= 900,000(+)

     

    So say what you want to make yourself feel better, but the facts are the facts. 

    Oh & by-the-way, NO ONE IS TRYING TO TAKE YOUR GUN AWAY.




    I don't own a gun.

     

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from pumpsie-green. Show pumpsie-green's posts

    Re: Explosions at Boston Marathon

    In response to softlaw2's comment:

    After this tragedy ends, I'm quite certain that the following facts won't change:

    1. U.S. Imiigration Policy won't change

    2. U.S. political leadership will not demand tolerance training for young male Muslims demanding such accountability from Muslim leadership in the U.S. and abroad

    3. U.S. public education policy with regard to this issue will not change

    4. The media and the chief executive will continue the same song and dance of the public sale of superficial and useless public empathy that sensationalizes and sells the next tragedy

    5. There will be no body politic and public outcry that U.S. and western Muslim leadership that Muslim leadership has failed in it's leadership positions

    6. The body politic and the public will continue to treat the issue as an administration of criminal justice issue

    6. U.S. and western political leadership will "we have to do something" and pass uselsess public safety regulations that make the people no safer and simply drive up the cost and burdens of living everyday life

    Please, spare me these superficial public speeches from politicians and all the public empathy broadcasted through the media, and the treatment of these regular national terrorist attacks as warranting a national reminder day of the tragedy that it's Pearl Harbor Part XXXXXXXX.

    I can't wait for the follow-up federal report and the American criminal justice system to roll into action to address this "senseless and cowardly act".

    After this, all that will happen is that more money will be spent, the cost of living will go up, personal liberty will go down, and, other than politicians and bureaucrats and their personal security, and every citizen of the United States will be more at risk to injury to person and property.



    Can't you even wait until they capture the second suspect and resolve this-not to mention ascertain all the facts-before spewing out your nonsense on a sports forum? Jerk.

     
  25. This post has been removed.

     

Share