1. You have chosen to ignore posts from mattb5fon. Show mattb5fon's posts

    HANLEYWOOD!

    posted at 7/25/2012 3:05 AM EDT

    Hanley and Randy Choate to the dodgers
     

  2. This post has been removed.

     

  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from mattb5fon. Show mattb5fon's posts

    Re: HANLEYWOOD!

    posted at 7/25/2012 3:43 AM EDT

    considering who he was traded for surprised they didnt pull the trigger! NYY could have got him easily. Then slid a-rod to DH next year or hanley
     

  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxpride34. Show redsoxpride34's posts

    Re: HANLEYWOOD!

    posted at 7/25/2012 4:13 AM EDT

    seems like dodgers didnt give up much, 1 top 100 prospect (#96 according to BA)  and a minor leaguer. makes you wonder what the sox could have got hanley for. 
     

  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from mattb5fon. Show mattb5fon's posts

    Re: HANLEYWOOD!

    posted at 7/25/2012 4:46 AM EDT

    exactly rsp34! The main guy is 1-6 with a 4.XX era this year. ridiculous. i understand it was a salary dump but still...
     

  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Alibiike. Show Alibiike's posts

    Re: HANLEYWOOD!

    posted at 7/25/2012 4:59 AM EDT

    Amazing how other teams barely give up anything to get star players. We give up star players and get nothing.
     

  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bill-806. Show Bill-806's posts

    Re: HANLEYWOOD!

    posted at 7/25/2012 8:23 AM EDT

       Goooood, Boston  & BILL-806 are not ready for another "DESPICABLE RAMIRZ"  !!!!
     

  8. This post has been removed.

     

  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from EnchiladaT. Show EnchiladaT's posts

    Re: HANLEYWOOD!

    posted at 7/25/2012 9:52 AM EDT

    Good trade, the Dodgers only need pay for two years and let him walk if he isn't any good. I assume he will be good enough though to back up Eithier in the line-up.

    Like I said about Elles, the same is for Hanley... any team will take them and pay a lot because they still have a year to re-trade the player if it doesn't work out.
     

  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Iceman4. Show Iceman4's posts

    Re: HANLEYWOOD!

    posted at 7/25/2012 10:06 AM EDT

    In Response to Re: HANLEYWOOD!:
    Amazing how other teams barely give up anything to get star players. We give up star players and get nothing.
    Posted by Alibiike


    Also because they know we are desperate
     

  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from dgalehouse. Show dgalehouse's posts

    Re: HANLEYWOOD!

    posted at 7/25/2012 10:41 AM EDT

    Hanley has regressed quite a bit. Let the Dodgers have him.
     

  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from lucbom. Show lucbom's posts

    Re: HANLEYWOOD!

    posted at 7/25/2012 10:53 AM EDT

    In Response to Re: HANLEYWOOD!:
    Hanley has regressed quite a bit. Let the Dodgers have him.
    Posted by dgalehouse


    If you think Hanley has regressed quite a bit, wait until the "dollywood social scene" gets their hands on Hanley.  You will be seeing him more on Entertainment Today/Tonight and not on ESPN or MLB.  Sure glad we didn't get this rich, young, naive, me first under performer.  Our Red Sox have enough of these fat cat bums already.  GO SOX!
     

  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from soups. Show soups's posts

    Re: HANLEYWOOD!

    posted at 7/25/2012 11:04 AM EDT

    Say what we will, the Dodgers just got better.  And for next to nothing.
     

  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from mrmojo1120. Show mrmojo1120's posts

    Re: HANLEYWOOD!

    posted at 7/25/2012 11:32 AM EDT

    The Red Sox asked the Marlins about Hanley Ramirez before last night’s trade, but Boston’s interest was in acquiring the infielder and flipping him to a third team, Rob Bradford of WEEI.com reports. It sounds as though the Red Sox were going to flip Ramirez to either the A’s or the Dodgers, Nick Cafardo of the Boston Globe reports (onTwitter).