If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    In response to Schumpeters-Ghost's comment:

    It was a mistake to keep Rice in Pawtucket in 1974.

    However, the Sox did have Yaz (who started the most games for them in LF in 1974).

    They also had Tommy Harper - who sort of fell apart that year.

    They also had Bernie Carbo (26 years old).

    That was their LF. 

    Rice should have been the LF the second half of  the season with Yaz at 1B.  It may have got them over the hump - but they were concerned about his defense.

    Bradley does not have to beat out Yaz or even Harper.  He has to beat out Johnny Gomes and Nava.

    Let him play!

     

     

     



    In 73, Jim Rice destroyed bristol and then destroyed Pawtucket when they brought him up.  He then obviously destroyed Pawtucket in 74.  Yes, they should have called him up in 74.

    JBJ struggled adapting to AA last year.

    Its not the same thing.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    In response to carnie's comment:

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to Drewski5's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    Unless hes going to play FT in Boston, theres no need to waste a year of control and waste his development riding the pine.

     



    I wouldnt be against him playing on the long side of a platoon.

     

    If he played in LF against all righties, and subbed in for Vic and Ells occasionally, he would play ~75% of the time.

    I would submit that this would be enough to prevent stunting his development.

    But I would give the job to who wins it.  Nava, Sweeney, Bradley, Carp, Hazelbaker all fighting for the spot.

    If Bradley wins it, he wins it.

     




    Even at that, Id rather he play 100% of the time. Right now theres no need to start the arb clock and only start him 75% of the time. Just because hes hit good the first few games of ST, although promising, isnt the end all be all. His senond half of AA wasnt great last year after they adjusted to him.

     

    In his last 43 games at AA he hit .218/.340/.404...

    Id rather him start at AA with a quick track to AAA, then maybe a call-up...But thats just me.

     



    I think that was more fatigue than the league adjusting to him. Just about every college player hits the wall sometime towards the end of their first full pro season. The same thing happened to Barnes last year.

     

     




    43 games left and hes out of gas? Maybe a bit of both I would say (adjustments/fatigue). Still, If thats the case then he still should start in AA or AAA so he can build up his stamina...

     

     



    Like I said on another thread, if he really lights it up all spring I think he'll start the year in Pawtucket. Otherwise he'll go back to Portland and try to show that the way he started out in AA is more who he is than the way he finished. Also Pawtucket currently has Brentz, Linares, Hazelbaker and Hassan in the outfield, so I'm thinking that an initial assignment to Portland is probably likely. At least I hope so, because I want to get a chance to see Bradley and Bogaerts on the same team without paying $40+ per ticket. :-)

     




    Yeah, you and me both...I think were going to have to catch a game in Portland early in the season to do that though.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from carnie. Show carnie's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to Drewski5's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    Unless hes going to play FT in Boston, theres no need to waste a year of control and waste his development riding the pine.

     



    I wouldnt be against him playing on the long side of a platoon.

     

    If he played in LF against all righties, and subbed in for Vic and Ells occasionally, he would play ~75% of the time.

    I would submit that this would be enough to prevent stunting his development.

    But I would give the job to who wins it.  Nava, Sweeney, Bradley, Carp, Hazelbaker all fighting for the spot.

    If Bradley wins it, he wins it.

     




    Even at that, Id rather he play 100% of the time. Right now theres no need to start the arb clock and only start him 75% of the time. Just because hes hit good the first few games of ST, although promising, isnt the end all be all. His senond half of AA wasnt great last year after they adjusted to him.

     

    In his last 43 games at AA he hit .218/.340/.404...

    Id rather him start at AA with a quick track to AAA, then maybe a call-up...But thats just me.

     



    I think that was more fatigue than the league adjusting to him. Just about every college player hits the wall sometime towards the end of their first full pro season. The same thing happened to Barnes last year.

     

     




    43 games left and hes out of gas? Maybe a bit of both I would say (adjustments/fatigue). Still, If thats the case then he still should start in AA or AAA so he can build up his stamina...

     

     



    Like I said on another thread, if he really lights it up all spring I think he'll start the year in Pawtucket. Otherwise he'll go back to Portland and try to show that the way he started out in AA is more who he is than the way he finished. Also Pawtucket currently has Brentz, Linares, Hazelbaker and Hassan in the outfield, so I'm thinking that an initial assignment to Portland is probably likely. At least I hope so, because I want to get a chance to see Bradley and Bogaerts on the same team without paying $40+ per ticket. :-)

     

     




    Yeah, you and me both...I think were going to have to catch a game in Portland early in the season to do that though.

     




    I'm planing on opening day for now. I checked into tickets and for $10 you get just about the best seats in the house. :-)

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    In response to softlaw2's comment:

    Pitiful to read these meaningless general comments about "age 23 and AA line split for part of the season".  None of you idiots have even seen Bradley, Jr. play, outside of a few times from video highlights and recently in spring training. I've seen him play, down here, over 50 games. He's been ready, defensively, to start as a MLB CF'er. He's a leader and has tremendous athletic talent and is very poised in competition. His last step is adjusting to MLB pitching, which he is showing will not be a hurdle he can't clear. Signing Victorino and keeping Ellsbury was simply management giving you idiots something to pretend and spend money on a pipe dream. It makes no sense, whatsoever!

    That said, Bradley, Jr. will need to display more consistency against MLB pitching over the full spring training. The Red Sox should have signed R. Johnson as a CF placeholder for MLB contract for 1 year and 2M, and signed Pods and Sizemore to minor league contracts. In the event Bradley, Jr. is ready for opening day, they simply trade R. Johnson. 

    The artifice of "need to save a year of control" is utterly laughable for the incompetent Red Sox management. Bradley propably needs more time hitting v. better pitching, but the knee jerk of "we decided to keep Ellsbury (Ellsbury can still be traded now)" or "we signed Shane" or any other nonsense as some artificial timeline excuse is why this managment is incompetent in building a roster.

    Right now, given what I've seen, I would simply do a public relations campaign and say that Bradley, Jr. isn't ready for the better MLB pitching but he'll get there and he's such a leader and so solid defensively. I would then put Ellsbury on the trade market and take the best trade offer for him. Time and value is better invested in Bradley, Jr., and worrying about having to pay him 5 or 10M more about a half a decade from now should only be an issue for idiots with fantasy baseball minds. The Red Sox and there massive payroll don't need to pretending to be a penny wise, when they are tons foolish.

    2013 OF opening day (not my original plan but my plan based on what's now on the books):

    LF  Gomes/Sweeney/Pinch Hitter

    CF Bradley, Jr.

    RF Shane

    Minors: Nava et al

     

    This won't happen, because Red Sox fans are still slobbering over Ellsbury, who has been a loser at every stage of baseball where he was being depended upon to be a season long starter.




    youve seen him dominate A-Ball...Sorry, but your 50 games of Greenville or Salem doesnt compare to seeing him struggle a bit in AA against advanced pitching...Have you seen him in AA where the competition is much more fierce and more comparable to MLB? I have...A few times.

    He should start back in AA with a quick promotion if warranted.

    And you call us idiots...Too funny.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    In response to carnie's comment:

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to Drewski5's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    Unless hes going to play FT in Boston, theres no need to waste a year of control and waste his development riding the pine.

     



    I wouldnt be against him playing on the long side of a platoon.

     

    If he played in LF against all righties, and subbed in for Vic and Ells occasionally, he would play ~75% of the time.

    I would submit that this would be enough to prevent stunting his development.

    But I would give the job to who wins it.  Nava, Sweeney, Bradley, Carp, Hazelbaker all fighting for the spot.

    If Bradley wins it, he wins it.

     




    Even at that, Id rather he play 100% of the time. Right now theres no need to start the arb clock and only start him 75% of the time. Just because hes hit good the first few games of ST, although promising, isnt the end all be all. His senond half of AA wasnt great last year after they adjusted to him.

     

    In his last 43 games at AA he hit .218/.340/.404...

    Id rather him start at AA with a quick track to AAA, then maybe a call-up...But thats just me.

     



    I think that was more fatigue than the league adjusting to him. Just about every college player hits the wall sometime towards the end of their first full pro season. The same thing happened to Barnes last year.

     

     




    43 games left and hes out of gas? Maybe a bit of both I would say (adjustments/fatigue). Still, If thats the case then he still should start in AA or AAA so he can build up his stamina...

     

     



    Like I said on another thread, if he really lights it up all spring I think he'll start the year in Pawtucket. Otherwise he'll go back to Portland and try to show that the way he started out in AA is more who he is than the way he finished. Also Pawtucket currently has Brentz, Linares, Hazelbaker and Hassan in the outfield, so I'm thinking that an initial assignment to Portland is probably likely. At least I hope so, because I want to get a chance to see Bradley and Bogaerts on the same team without paying $40+ per ticket. :-)

     

     




    Yeah, you and me both...I think were going to have to catch a game in Portland early in the season to do that though.

     

     




    I'm planing on opening day for now. I checked into tickets and for $10 you get just about the best seats in the house. :-)

     




    Im there carnie!!! Opening day in Portland.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    In response to selenium-'s comment:

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to Drewski5's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    Unless hes going to play FT in Boston, theres no need to waste a year of control and waste his development riding the pine.

     



    I wouldnt be against him playing on the long side of a platoon.

     

    If he played in LF against all righties, and subbed in for Vic and Ells occasionally, he would play ~75% of the time.

    I would submit that this would be enough to prevent stunting his development.

    But I would give the job to who wins it.  Nava, Sweeney, Bradley, Carp, Hazelbaker all fighting for the spot.

    If Bradley wins it, he wins it.

     




    Even at that, Id rather he play 100% of the time. Right now theres no need to start the arb clock and only start him 75% of the time. Just because hes hit good the first few games of ST, although promising, isnt the end all be all. His senond half of AA wasnt great last year after they adjusted to him.

     

    In his last 43 games at AA he hit .218/.340/.404...

    Id rather him start at AA with a quick track to AAA, then maybe a call-up...But thats just me.

     



    I think that was more fatigue than the league adjusting to him. Just about every college player hits the wall sometime towards the end of their first full pro season. The same thing happened to Barnes last year.

     

     




    43 games left and hes out of gas? Maybe a bit of both I would say (adjustments/fatigue). Still, If thats the case then he still should start in AA or AAA so he can build up his stamina...

     

     



    Like I said on another thread, if he really lights it up all spring I think he'll start the year in Pawtucket. Otherwise he'll go back to Portland and try to show that the way he started out in AA is more who he is than the way he finished. Also Pawtucket currently has Brentz, Linares, Hazelbaker and Hassan in the outfield, so I'm thinking that an initial assignment to Portland is probably likely. At least I hope so, because I want to get a chance to see Bradley and Bogaerts on the same team without paying $40+ per ticket. :-)

     

     




    Yeah, you and me both...I think were going to have to catch a game in Portland early in the season to do that though.

     

     




    I'm planing on opening day for now. I checked into tickets and for $10 you get just about the best seats in the house. :-)

     

     


     And for the rest of us there, we can subscribe to MiLB-TV for $40 per season and watch many Pawsox and Sea Dogs  from the comfort of our living rooms.

     




    Nothing like watching the "kids" live and in person at the ballpark...

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

    In response to selenium-'s comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to Drewski5's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    Unless hes going to play FT in Boston, theres no need to waste a year of control and waste his development riding the pine.

     



    I wouldnt be against him playing on the long side of a platoon.

     

    If he played in LF against all righties, and subbed in for Vic and Ells occasionally, he would play ~75% of the time.

    I would submit that this would be enough to prevent stunting his development.

    But I would give the job to who wins it.  Nava, Sweeney, Bradley, Carp, Hazelbaker all fighting for the spot.

    If Bradley wins it, he wins it.

     




    Even at that, Id rather he play 100% of the time. Right now theres no need to start the arb clock and only start him 75% of the time. Just because hes hit good the first few games of ST, although promising, isnt the end all be all. His senond half of AA wasnt great last year after they adjusted to him.

     

    In his last 43 games at AA he hit .218/.340/.404...

    Id rather him start at AA with a quick track to AAA, then maybe a call-up...But thats just me.

     



    I think that was more fatigue than the league adjusting to him. Just about every college player hits the wall sometime towards the end of their first full pro season. The same thing happened to Barnes last year.

     

     




    43 games left and hes out of gas? Maybe a bit of both I would say (adjustments/fatigue). Still, If thats the case then he still should start in AA or AAA so he can build up his stamina...

     

     



    Like I said on another thread, if he really lights it up all spring I think he'll start the year in Pawtucket. Otherwise he'll go back to Portland and try to show that the way he started out in AA is more who he is than the way he finished. Also Pawtucket currently has Brentz, Linares, Hazelbaker and Hassan in the outfield, so I'm thinking that an initial assignment to Portland is probably likely. At least I hope so, because I want to get a chance to see Bradley and Bogaerts on the same team without paying $40+ per ticket. :-)

     

     




    Yeah, you and me both...I think were going to have to catch a game in Portland early in the season to do that though.

     

     




    I'm planing on opening day for now. I checked into tickets and for $10 you get just about the best seats in the house. :-)

     

     


     And for the rest of us there, we can subscribe to MiLB-TV for $40 per season and watch many Pawsox and Sea Dogs  from the comfort of our living rooms.

     

     




    Nothing like watching the "kids" live and in person at the ballpark...

     



    Minor league parks are where its at.  Strictly for baseball lovers.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from Schumpeters-Ghost. Show Schumpeters-Ghost's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    In response to SpacemanEephus's comment:

    In 73, Jim Rice destroyed bristol and then destroyed Pawtucket when they brought him up.  He then obviously destroyed Pawtucket in 74.  Yes, they should have called him up in 74.

     

    JBJ struggled adapting to AA last year.

    Its not the same thing.




    Again - JBJ has to beat out Gomes and Nava - not Yaz.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    In response to Schumpeters-Ghost's comment:

    In response to SpacemanEephus's comment:

     

    In 73, Jim Rice destroyed bristol and then destroyed Pawtucket when they brought him up.  He then obviously destroyed Pawtucket in 74.  Yes, they should have called him up in 74.

     

    JBJ struggled adapting to AA last year.

    Its not the same thing.

     




     

    Again - JBJ has to beat out Gomes and Nava - not Yaz.



    Again, its not about beating anyone out.  Its about being ready for the Bigs.  Jim Rice tore up AA and AAA during the year inwhich we agree he should have been called up.  No question Gold Dust #1 was ready.  Jackie Bradley swooned when he was called up to AA last year.  Many questions as to whether he is ready.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from Schumpeters-Ghost. Show Schumpeters-Ghost's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    In response to SpacemanEephus's comment:

    Again, its not about beating anyone out.  Its about being ready for the Bigs.  




    nonsensical.

    If Bradley beats out Gomes and nava he is by definition "ready for the bigs" 

     

    Unless you are arguing that Gomes and Nava are not "ready for the bigs" (which come to think of it may be true).

    There is a very good chance that, early promotion or not, Bradley at his present level is the 3rd best OF in the entire Red Sox organization. 

    Now, it's likely the Red Sox will put their 3rd best OF in Portland - but that is stupid. 

    If he plays everyday in Boston it is not going to hurt him. 

    Dwight Evans came up at age 21.  Was he dominant at age 21?  Nope.  But he became a great ball player over time.

    Even when he first came up and was raw and green - he was STILL better than Rick Miller. 

    That's the whole point - bring up the young guy.  Don't role out that slob Gomes into LF because you are afraid.

     

     

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from seannybboi. Show seannybboi's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    How can you send this guy down!

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    In response to Schumpeters-Ghost's comment:

    In response to SpacemanEephus's comment:

     

    Again, its not about beating anyone out.  Its about being ready for the Bigs.  

     




     

    nonsensical.

    If Bradley beats out Gomes and nava he is by definition "ready for the bigs" 

     

    Unless you are arguing that Gomes and Nava are not "ready for the bigs" (which come to think of it may be true).

    There is a very good chance that, early promotion or not, Bradley at his present level is the 3rd best OF in the entire Red Sox organization. 

    Now, it's likely the Red Sox will put their 3rd best OF in Portland - but that is stupid. 

    If he plays everyday in Boston it is not going to hurt him. 

    Dwight Evans came up at age 21.  Was he dominant at age 21?  Nope.  But he became a great ball player over time.

    Even when he first came up and was raw and green - he was STILL better than Rick Miller. 

    That's the whole point - bring up the young guy.  Don't role out that slob Gomes into LF because you are afraid.

     

     



    Dewey also raked at the AAA level.

    Hey, I am excited.  I love Jackie Bradley.  

    But, I want to see him have some success hitting at AA nevermind AAA before I pencil him into the Sox lineup.  If he is still hitting great in mid-late March when pitchers start really pitching, I have already said i will take that as an acceptable substitute.  But, until he proves otherwise, he is still a AA level hitter.  Huge difference from Rice or Dewey when they were called up.

    Will he be better than Gomes. Sweeney, Nava and whatever other half-decent lunch-pail guys ahead of him on the depth chart?  YES.  Much better.  Can he hit as well as Gomes at the major league level RIGHT NOW?  My guess is no.  Your guess is yes.  this is the crux of our differeing opinion.  I think that you are over-emphasizing upside in your analysis of the present.  Now, like I said, if towards the end of ST, JBJ is still hitting, then I will easily and most happily concede that he is ready and has amazingly morphed into a big league hitter over the winter.

     

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    Sadly, we did not max out on an Ellsbury trade while the comp pick is still attached, even so, with little chance to make it anywhere this year, I'd keep JBJ's years of service another year. Bring him up the day after the cut off date.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    In response to Schumpeters-Ghost's comment:

    It was a mistake to keep Rice in Pawtucket in 1974.

    However, the Sox did have Yaz (who started the most games for them in LF in 1974).

    They also had Tommy Harper - who sort of fell apart that year.

    They also had Bernie Carbo (26 years old).

    That was their LF. 

    Rice should have been the LF the second half of  the season with Yaz at 1B.  It may have got them over the hump - but they were concerned about his defense.

    Bradley does not have to beat out Yaz or even Harper.  He has to beat out Johnny Gomes and Nava.

    Let him play!

     

     

     



    Fred Lynn probably could have come up in 1074 as well

    Although he was only 22, he was already a great fielder and had an .857 OPS in AAA that year.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxpride34. Show redsoxpride34's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    3 for 5 today with a stolen base, pencil him in at LF

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    In response to Bane_Capital's comment:

    In response to moonslav59's comment:

     

    In response to Schumpeters-Ghost's comment:

     

    It was a mistake to keep Rice in Pawtucket in 1974.

    However, the Sox did have Yaz (who started the most games for them in LF in 1974).

    They also had Tommy Harper - who sort of fell apart that year.

    They also had Bernie Carbo (26 years old).

    That was their LF. 

    Rice should have been the LF the second half of  the season with Yaz at 1B.  It may have got them over the hump - but they were concerned about his defense.

    Bradley does not have to beat out Yaz or even Harper.  He has to beat out Johnny Gomes and Nava.

    Let him play!

     

     

     

     



    Fred Lynn probably could have come up in 1074 as well

     

    Although he was only 22, he was already a great fielder and had an .857 OPS in AAA that year.

     




    Actually, 1074 was when Tim Wakefield made his debut.

     



    excellent

     

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from snakeoil123. Show snakeoil123's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    In response to softlaw2's comment:

    Pitiful to read these meaningless general comments about "age 23 and AA line split for part of the season".  None of you idiots have even seen Bradley, Jr. play, outside of a few times from video highlights and recently in spring training. I've seen him play, down here, over 50 games. He's been ready, defensively, to start as a MLB CF'er. He's a leader and has tremendous athletic talent and is very poised in competition. His last step is adjusting to MLB pitching, which he is showing will not be a hurdle he can't clear. Signing Victorino and keeping Ellsbury was simply management giving you idiots something to pretend and spend money on a pipe dream. It makes no sense, whatsoever!

    That said, Bradley, Jr. will need to display more consistency against MLB pitching over the full spring training. The Red Sox should have signed R. Johnson as a CF placeholder for MLB contract for 1 year and 2M, and signed Pods and Sizemore to minor league contracts. In the event Bradley, Jr. is ready for opening day, they simply trade R. Johnson. 

    The artifice of "need to save a year of control" is utterly laughable for the incompetent Red Sox management. Bradley propably needs more time hitting v. better pitching, but the knee jerk of "we decided to keep Ellsbury (Ellsbury can still be traded now)" or "we signed Shane" or any other nonsense as some artificial timeline excuse is why this managment is incompetent in building a roster.

    Right now, given what I've seen, I would simply do a public relations campaign and say that Bradley, Jr. isn't ready for the better MLB pitching but he'll get there and he's such a leader and so solid defensively. I would then put Ellsbury on the trade market and take the best trade offer for him. Time and value is better invested in Bradley, Jr., and worrying about having to pay him 5 or 10M more about a half a decade from now should only be an issue for idiots with fantasy baseball minds. The Red Sox and there massive payroll don't need to pretending to be a penny wise, when they are tons foolish.

    2013 OF opening day (not my original plan but my plan based on what's now on the books):

    LF  Gomes/Sweeney/Pinch Hitter

    CF Bradley, Jr.

    RF Shane

    Minors: Nava et al

     

    This won't happen, because Red Sox fans are still slobbering over Ellsbury, who has been a loser at every stage of baseball where he was being depended upon to be a season long starter.



    I've seen Bradley play numerous times.  I've seen him struggle and i have seen him play routine fly balls ointo triples.

    Regardless he is extremely talented and may be ready, I think they are waiting to see how he does the rest of the Spring.  As far as Ells goes he really has nothing to do with this particular situation.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from snakeoil123. Show snakeoil123's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to selenium-'s comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to Drewski5's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    Unless hes going to play FT in Boston, theres no need to waste a year of control and waste his development riding the pine.

     



    I wouldnt be against him playing on the long side of a platoon.

     

    If he played in LF against all righties, and subbed in for Vic and Ells occasionally, he would play ~75% of the time.

    I would submit that this would be enough to prevent stunting his development.

    But I would give the job to who wins it.  Nava, Sweeney, Bradley, Carp, Hazelbaker all fighting for the spot.

    If Bradley wins it, he wins it.

     




    Even at that, Id rather he play 100% of the time. Right now theres no need to start the arb clock and only start him 75% of the time. Just because hes hit good the first few games of ST, although promising, isnt the end all be all. His senond half of AA wasnt great last year after they adjusted to him.

     

    In his last 43 games at AA he hit .218/.340/.404...

    Id rather him start at AA with a quick track to AAA, then maybe a call-up...But thats just me.

     



    I think that was more fatigue than the league adjusting to him. Just about every college player hits the wall sometime towards the end of their first full pro season. The same thing happened to Barnes last year.

     

     




    43 games left and hes out of gas? Maybe a bit of both I would say (adjustments/fatigue). Still, If thats the case then he still should start in AA or AAA so he can build up his stamina...

     

     



    Like I said on another thread, if he really lights it up all spring I think he'll start the year in Pawtucket. Otherwise he'll go back to Portland and try to show that the way he started out in AA is more who he is than the way he finished. Also Pawtucket currently has Brentz, Linares, Hazelbaker and Hassan in the outfield, so I'm thinking that an initial assignment to Portland is probably likely. At least I hope so, because I want to get a chance to see Bradley and Bogaerts on the same team without paying $40+ per ticket. :-)

     

     




    Yeah, you and me both...I think were going to have to catch a game in Portland early in the season to do that though.

     

     




    I'm planing on opening day for now. I checked into tickets and for $10 you get just about the best seats in the house. :-)

     

     


     And for the rest of us there, we can subscribe to MiLB-TV for $40 per season and watch many Pawsox and Sea Dogs  from the comfort of our living rooms.

     

     




    Nothing like watching the "kids" live and in person at the ballpark...

     

     



    Minor league parks are where its at.  Strictly for baseball lovers.

     



    Hadlock is a great place to watch a game.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from Schumpeters-Ghost. Show Schumpeters-Ghost's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    In response to SpacemanEephus's comment:

    Dewey also raked at the AAA level.

    Hey, I am excited.  I love Jackie Bradley.  

    But, I want to see him have some success hitting at AA nevermind AAA before I pencil him into the Sox lineup.  If he is still hitting great in mid-late March when pitchers start really pitching, I have already said i will take that as an acceptable substitute.  But, until he proves otherwise, he is still a AA level hitter.  Huge difference from Rice or Dewey when they were called up.

    Will he be better than Gomes. Sweeney, Nava and whatever other half-decent lunch-pail guys ahead of him on the depth chart?  YES.  Much better.  Can he hit as well as Gomes at the major league level RIGHT NOW?  My guess is no.  Your guess is yes.  this is the crux of our differeing opinion.  I think that you are over-emphasizing upside in your analysis of the present.  Now, like I said, if towards the end of ST, JBJ is still hitting, then I will easily and most happily concede that he is ready and has amazingly morphed into a big league hitter over the winter.




    True - Dewey did play great at AAA (at age 20) - but he skipped AA altogether.  Evans Rice and Lynn in the same organization all youngsters.  Burleson and Fisk also youngsters.  Wow!!  Tell me again how that team didn't win multiple WS?  (I digress)

    Agree with this also - our difference is in how we see Gomes. 

     

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from mef429. Show mef429's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    In response to Schumpeters-Ghost's comment:

    In response to SpacemanEephus's comment:

     

    Dewey also raked at the AAA level.

    Hey, I am excited.  I love Jackie Bradley.  

    But, I want to see him have some success hitting at AA nevermind AAA before I pencil him into the Sox lineup.  If he is still hitting great in mid-late March when pitchers start really pitching, I have already said i will take that as an acceptable substitute.  But, until he proves otherwise, he is still a AA level hitter.  Huge difference from Rice or Dewey when they were called up.

    Will he be better than Gomes. Sweeney, Nava and whatever other half-decent lunch-pail guys ahead of him on the depth chart?  YES.  Much better.  Can he hit as well as Gomes at the major league level RIGHT NOW?  My guess is no.  Your guess is yes.  this is the crux of our differeing opinion.  I think that you are over-emphasizing upside in your analysis of the present.  Now, like I said, if towards the end of ST, JBJ is still hitting, then I will easily and most happily concede that he is ready and has amazingly morphed into a big league hitter over the winter.

     




    True - Dewey did play great at AAA (at age 20) - but he skipped AA altogether.  Evans Rice and Lynn in the same organization all youngsters.  Burleson and Fisk also youngsters.  Wow!!  Tell me again how that team didn't win multiple WS?  (I digress)

     

    Agree with this also - our difference is in how we see Gomes. 

     




    you underestimate Gomes... if he is used properly he will have pretty damn good numbers. If he has a ton of ABs against RHP then not so much..

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: If Jackie Bradley, Jr. Continues to Impress...

    Ron Guidry, Steinbrenner $$$$ that bought the best free agents on the market. Why don't you ever obsess about that?  NYY were richer than the Red Sox so why do you hold that against the Red Sox ( "your team'). I think that the 1974-78 Red Sox was their best team. No Rings to show for it but that doesn't change my opinion. Only a fool would rate a team based on Rings.

    I agree that rings should not be the only decision maker, and the 1975 team might have been an Ed Armbrister away from 1 ring and a Bucky Dent away from another, but that Sox era team had a serious flaw: pitching.

    I loved Luis Tiant, and he almsot single-handedly led us to a ring, but we were not very deep in pitching, especially if you value WHIP as much as ERA.

    Our 1975 to 1978 teams had these staffs:

    1975: No pitcher with a WHIP lower than 1.283 (Willoughby-our 10th most IP guy)

    Tiant 18-14  4.02, Lee 17-9 3.95, and Wise 19-12 3.95 was a nice top 3 starter combo, and Reggie Cleveland and Dick pole were not horrible, but our pen was a bit weak by today's standards. (Moret went 14-3  3.60 in 16 starts.) Dick Drago was out "closer" at 3.84 and 1.376 (15 svs), Segui, Burton, Willoughby. Wow, we only used 12 pitchers in 1975 and only 8 guys with over 53 IP. Can we bring back that medical team/trainer.

    In 1976 we used 11 pitchers- 9 with more than 44 IP.  Cleveland & Pole with 14-15 GS'd and in the pen and fergie Jenkins (12-11 3.27) & Rick Jones (5-3  3.36)at starters. Willoughby to closer- No Drago. Added Tom Murpphy and Tom House as bottom pen guys.

    1977 had Fergie and Cleveland with the most IP. Bill Campbell and Don Aase added. Bob Stanley and Mike Paxton as well.

    1978 had 20 game winner Eck, a 16-13 Mike Torrez, 13-8 Tiant, 10-10 Lee and Jim Wright/Allen Ripley as starters. Stanley, Drago, Burgmeier, Campbell, and Hassler in the pen.

     

    I don't see these staffs as being close to the ones in 2004 and 2007, but they were pretty good.

     

     

     

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share