1. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

     

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

     

    In response to Flapjack07's comment:

     

    There are still way too many evil, creepy insecure Biblephobes

    The only thing to fear about the Bible (which for the most part is a laugh-fest) is its teachings being forced on others by religious zealosts.

    It is quite creepy for a professional athlete to wait until impending FA to pronounce his current sexual proclivity,

    If his "sexual proclivity" was heterosexual, I doubt his making it known in public would be considered "creepy."

     



    This all boils down to those who don't like christians.  I'm called vile names because I believe marriage is between one man and one woman. 

     

    Because progressives control the country and the media you believe you can bully christians,  you feel empowered.  Have at it.  God is my defender, I have nothing to fear.

     



    Progressives control the country because it is a democracy and the movement of people in this particular democracy tends toward progress:  away from bigotry wrapped in the name of God (blasphemy in its most egregious form) and towards tolerance and undertsanding.  

     

     



    Progressives control this country because we have become a welfare country.  So many people are getting so many free handouts. They of course keep voting in the hand that feeds them. We are progressing towards a socialist nation.  As Margaret Thatcher once said socialism lasts as until you run out of other people's money.  Enjoy what you have while you have it.  Socialism never has worked and it never will.

     



    Welp, if you think what we have in this country is anything remotely akin to socialism, its a good thing we dont have a dead red pinko commie like Reagan or Nixon running the show.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from 67redsox. Show 67redsox's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to Flapjack07's comment:

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

     

    In response to Flapjack07's comment:

     

    There are still way too many evil, creepy insecure Biblephobes

    The only thing to fear about the Bible (which for the most part is a laugh-fest) is its teachings being forced on others by religious zealosts.

    It is quite creepy for a professional athlete to wait until impending FA to pronounce his current sexual proclivity,

    If his "sexual proclivity" was heterosexual, I doubt his making it known in public would be considered "creepy."

     



    This all boils down to those who don't like christians.  I'm called vile names because I believe marriage is between one man and one woman. 

     

    Because progressives control the country and the media you believe you can bully christians,  you feel empowered.  Have at it.  God is my defender, I have nothing to fear.

     




     

    I'm a libertarian actually, so no one can accuse me of controlling the country or the media...LOL.

    And I don't hate or go through life bullying Christians (I'm married to one)...people can believe what they want to believe as far as I'm concerned. But if you inject your religion into political and social issues like this, and act as if everyone else is obligated to live according to your church's dictates, then I have no problem voicing my displeasure at that.

    Have a nice day.




    So, I can believe what I want to believe as long as I don't behave like a christian.  How does that make sense?  Are you saying that I can profess my faith in church but it must stay there.  I can't bring my beliefs into the public square? You honestly can't mean this.

    What happened to freedom of speech, freedom of religion?  You can't seperate a person from their faith as you can't seperate a person from their ancestry.

    There is a reason that marraige has been between a man and a woman for thousands of years in multiple countries with multiple religions.  As I said earlier there is the natural law.  People of all races and creeds know that it's wrong to kill, rape and steal.  All these cultures knew that marraige is between one man and one woman for the same reason, natural law.

    People are using christianity as an excuse to attack those of us who have differnt beliefs.

     

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to softlaw2's comment:

    The basic problem you have is that you do not recognize gay Americans as a legitimate minority group that has been oppressed here for generations.

    The basic problem is that you attempt to use the artifice of "gay" to try and pretend that one particular subjective sexual behavioral proclivity is a valid basis to create the artifice of a physical identity that you want classified as a federal group class of persons. It's intellectually absurd, much less Constituionally absurd, to attempt to classify people based on sexual behavioral proclivity.

    Even today there are literally hundreds of laws that discriminate against them.

    Today, there are literally hundreds of laws which discriminate aginast people who make a lot of money, among other various motivations for legistlation and regulation initiatives.

    In some states its legal to fire gay employees just because they are gay.

    No one is "gay", in the context you attempt to use it in. It's legal for employers to fire persons who are married and have children, who can't lift heavy objects anymore.  It's legal to for employers to fire people for amost any reason, in most states. Why should the issue of sexual proclvity be placed on a higher government intervention priority than people who are fired for speaking out on social issues that the employer finds detrimental to it's commerce.  

    Is that fair Softy?

    I understand you believe in collectivism and a State imposed "fariness", but life isn't fair and the federal government doesn't have any Constitutional authority to adminster "fairness". I understand you have your views as to how the federal government should insure "fairness", and I'm quite sure that you do not consider the impact that your vision of "fairness" has beyong your nose.

    Most civilized countries are now passing appropriate laws aimed at correcting this,

    Right, like the "affirmative" action regulations that could only be enforced through quotas. Except, in the case, you are voting for elective representatives who pander to your vision of "fairness" for groups of people with certain types of shared sexual behavioral proclivity. Aside from the illegitimacy of identifying groups on that basis, it's completely impossible for any body politic to enforce such laws with violating both substantive due process and equal protection. Identity is the problem, my passionate utopian seeking fellow non-hater American.   

    and hopefully in June the Supreme Court will affirm what most of this country now believes is right. You are a real work of art Softy; not good art, but really bad art.

    Depends on who does the poll, but your attempt to intimidate certain members of the Supreme Court to cave in to populism (because you believe the winds are now down wind in your favor) is certainly part of the playbook of those seeking to advance the agenda of this issue. In June, the Supreme Court will either reject the intellectually and legally fraudulent notion that sexual behavioral proclivity and/or conduct is a basis for group class equal protection purposes to override the will of the people of various States or the representives laws of various States; or they will right new laws extra-Constitionally and follow the mold of the childish "trimester to determine life" intellectual fraud.

    Art is art, by definition. To subjectively say that it's "good" or "bad" speaks to your bigotry.

    I like how the bigoted Space called Tebow a "tool", which speaks volumes as to the state of his pride and prejudice.   



    hahaha.  I think Tebow is a tool, but his tool-nature has only peripheral relation to his religious expression.  

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from 67redsox. Show 67redsox's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

     

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

     

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

     

    In response to Flapjack07's comment:

     

    There are still way too many evil, creepy insecure Biblephobes

    The only thing to fear about the Bible (which for the most part is a laugh-fest) is its teachings being forced on others by religious zealosts.

    It is quite creepy for a professional athlete to wait until impending FA to pronounce his current sexual proclivity,

    If his "sexual proclivity" was heterosexual, I doubt his making it known in public would be considered "creepy."

     



    This all boils down to those who don't like christians.  I'm called vile names because I believe marriage is between one man and one woman. 

     

    Because progressives control the country and the media you believe you can bully christians,  you feel empowered.  Have at it.  God is my defender, I have nothing to fear.

     



    Progressives control the country because it is a democracy and the movement of people in this particular democracy tends toward progress:  away from bigotry wrapped in the name of God (blasphemy in its most egregious form) and towards tolerance and undertsanding.  

     

     



    Progressives control this country because we have become a welfare country.  So many people are getting so many free handouts. They of course keep voting in the hand that feeds them. We are progressing towards a socialist nation.  As Margaret Thatcher once said socialism lasts as until you run out of other people's money.  Enjoy what you have while you have it.  Socialism never has worked and it never will.

     

     



    Welp, if you think what we have in this country is anything remotely akin to socialism, its a good thing we dont have a dead red pinko commie like Reagan or Nixon running the show.

     




    We are progessing toward socialism, we are not there yet but we are fast approaching.  We are trillions in debt with no end in sight.  Good luck with that.  Look at greece and spain.  Look at states that have a lot of debt. Not good. This is where progressives are taking us.  If we continue on this road we will all be toast.  There will be a level playing field at last but you won't like it.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

     

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

     

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

     

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

     

    In response to Flapjack07's comment:

     

    There are still way too many evil, creepy insecure Biblephobes

    The only thing to fear about the Bible (which for the most part is a laugh-fest) is its teachings being forced on others by religious zealosts.

    It is quite creepy for a professional athlete to wait until impending FA to pronounce his current sexual proclivity,

    If his "sexual proclivity" was heterosexual, I doubt his making it known in public would be considered "creepy."

     



    This all boils down to those who don't like christians.  I'm called vile names because I believe marriage is between one man and one woman. 

     

    Because progressives control the country and the media you believe you can bully christians,  you feel empowered.  Have at it.  God is my defender, I have nothing to fear.

     



    Progressives control the country because it is a democracy and the movement of people in this particular democracy tends toward progress:  away from bigotry wrapped in the name of God (blasphemy in its most egregious form) and towards tolerance and undertsanding.  

     

     



    Progressives control this country because we have become a welfare country.  So many people are getting so many free handouts. They of course keep voting in the hand that feeds them. We are progressing towards a socialist nation.  As Margaret Thatcher once said socialism lasts as until you run out of other people's money.  Enjoy what you have while you have it.  Socialism never has worked and it never will.

     

     



    Welp, if you think what we have in this country is anything remotely akin to socialism, its a good thing we dont have a dead red pinko commie like Reagan or Nixon running the show.

     

     




    We are progessing toward socialism, we are not there yet but we are fast approaching.  We are trillions in debt with no end in sight.  Good luck with that.  Look at greece and spain.  Look at states that have a lot of debt. Not good. This is where progressives are taking us.  If we continue on this road we will all be toast.  There will be a level playing field at last but you won't like it.

     



    The misconception that social spending is anything more than a minor factor in the debt and the economic collapse is understandable.  It is what has been foisted upon us as the witch to burn in a brazen but wholly unsupportable pitch by the corporate power structure.  

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from 67redsox. Show 67redsox's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to softlaw2's comment:

    The basic problem you have is that you do not recognize gay Americans as a legitimate minority group that has been oppressed here for generations.

    The basic problem is that you attempt to use the artifice of "gay" to try and pretend that one particular subjective sexual behavioral proclivity is a valid basis to create the artifice of a physical identity that you want classified as a federal group class of persons. It's intellectually absurd, much less Constituionally absurd, to attempt to classify people based on sexual behavioral proclivity.

    Even today there are literally hundreds of laws that discriminate against them.

    Today, there are literally hundreds of laws which discriminate aginast people who make a lot of money, among other various motivations for legistlation and regulation initiatives.

    In some states its legal to fire gay employees just because they are gay.

    No one is "gay", in the context you attempt to use it in. It's legal for employers to fire persons who are married and have children, who can't lift heavy objects anymore.  It's legal to for employers to fire people for amost any reason, in most states. Why should the issue of sexual proclvity be placed on a higher government intervention priority than people who are fired for speaking out on social issues that the employer finds detrimental to it's commerce.  

    Is that fair Softy?

    I understand you believe in collectivism and a State imposed "fariness", but life isn't fair and the federal government doesn't have any Constitutional authority to adminster "fairness". I understand you have your views as to how the federal government should insure "fairness", and I'm quite sure that you do not consider the impact that your vision of "fairness" has beyong your nose.

    Most civilized countries are now passing appropriate laws aimed at correcting this,

    Right, like the "affirmative" action regulations that could only be enforced through quotas. Except, in the case, you are voting for elective representatives who pander to your vision of "fairness" for groups of people with certain types of shared sexual behavioral proclivity. Aside from the illegitimacy of identifying groups on that basis, it's completely impossible for any body politic to enforce such laws with violating both substantive due process and equal protection. Identity is the problem, my passionate utopian seeking fellow non-hater American.   

    and hopefully in June the Supreme Court will affirm what most of this country now believes is right. You are a real work of art Softy; not good art, but really bad art.

    Depends on who does the poll, but your attempt to intimidate certain members of the Supreme Court to cave in to populism (because you believe the winds are now down wind in your favor) is certainly part of the playbook of those seeking to advance the agenda of this issue. In June, the Supreme Court will either reject the intellectually and legally fraudulent notion that sexual behavioral proclivity and/or conduct is a basis for group class equal protection purposes to override the will of the people of various States or the representives laws of various States; or they will right new laws extra-Constitionally and follow the mold of the childish "trimester to determine life" intellectual fraud.

    Art is art, by definition. To subjectively say that it's "good" or "bad" speaks to your bigotry.

    I like how the bigoted Space called Tebow a "tool", which speaks volumes as to the state of his pride and prejudice.   




    After the supreme court voted to uphold obamacare I have little respect for them. 

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from 67redsox. Show 67redsox's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

     

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

     

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

     

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

     

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

     

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

     

    In response to Flapjack07's comment:

     

    There are still way too many evil, creepy insecure Biblephobes

    The only thing to fear about the Bible (which for the most part is a laugh-fest) is its teachings being forced on others by religious zealosts.

    It is quite creepy for a professional athlete to wait until impending FA to pronounce his current sexual proclivity,

    If his "sexual proclivity" was heterosexual, I doubt his making it known in public would be considered "creepy."

     



    This all boils down to those who don't like christians.  I'm called vile names because I believe marriage is between one man and one woman. 

     

    Because progressives control the country and the media you believe you can bully christians,  you feel empowered.  Have at it.  God is my defender, I have nothing to fear.

     



    Progressives control the country because it is a democracy and the movement of people in this particular democracy tends toward progress:  away from bigotry wrapped in the name of God (blasphemy in its most egregious form) and towards tolerance and undertsanding.  

     

     



    Progressives control this country because we have become a welfare country.  So many people are getting so many free handouts. They of course keep voting in the hand that feeds them. We are progressing towards a socialist nation.  As Margaret Thatcher once said socialism lasts as until you run out of other people's money.  Enjoy what you have while you have it.  Socialism never has worked and it never will.

     

     



    Welp, if you think what we have in this country is anything remotely akin to socialism, its a good thing we dont have a dead red pinko commie like Reagan or Nixon running the show.

     

     




    We are progessing toward socialism, we are not there yet but we are fast approaching.  We are trillions in debt with no end in sight.  Good luck with that.  Look at greece and spain.  Look at states that have a lot of debt. Not good. This is where progressives are taking us.  If we continue on this road we will all be toast.  There will be a level playing field at last but you won't like it.

     

     



    The misconception that social spending is anything more than a minor factor in the debt and the economic collapse is understandable.  It is what has been foisted upon us as the witch to burn in a brazen but wholly unsupportable pitch by the corporate power structure.  

     

     



    You are misinformed. Again, when things fall apart you will be in the same sad boat as the rest of us. 

     

     

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

    In response to softlaw2's comment:

     

    The basic problem you have is that you do not recognize gay Americans as a legitimate minority group that has been oppressed here for generations.

    The basic problem is that you attempt to use the artifice of "gay" to try and pretend that one particular subjective sexual behavioral proclivity is a valid basis to create the artifice of a physical identity that you want classified as a federal group class of persons. It's intellectually absurd, much less Constituionally absurd, to attempt to classify people based on sexual behavioral proclivity.

    Even today there are literally hundreds of laws that discriminate against them.

    Today, there are literally hundreds of laws which discriminate aginast people who make a lot of money, among other various motivations for legistlation and regulation initiatives.

    In some states its legal to fire gay employees just because they are gay.

    No one is "gay", in the context you attempt to use it in. It's legal for employers to fire persons who are married and have children, who can't lift heavy objects anymore.  It's legal to for employers to fire people for amost any reason, in most states. Why should the issue of sexual proclvity be placed on a higher government intervention priority than people who are fired for speaking out on social issues that the employer finds detrimental to it's commerce.  

    Is that fair Softy?

    I understand you believe in collectivism and a State imposed "fariness", but life isn't fair and the federal government doesn't have any Constitutional authority to adminster "fairness". I understand you have your views as to how the federal government should insure "fairness", and I'm quite sure that you do not consider the impact that your vision of "fairness" has beyong your nose.

    Most civilized countries are now passing appropriate laws aimed at correcting this,

    Right, like the "affirmative" action regulations that could only be enforced through quotas. Except, in the case, you are voting for elective representatives who pander to your vision of "fairness" for groups of people with certain types of shared sexual behavioral proclivity. Aside from the illegitimacy of identifying groups on that basis, it's completely impossible for any body politic to enforce such laws with violating both substantive due process and equal protection. Identity is the problem, my passionate utopian seeking fellow non-hater American.   

    and hopefully in June the Supreme Court will affirm what most of this country now believes is right. You are a real work of art Softy; not good art, but really bad art.

    Depends on who does the poll, but your attempt to intimidate certain members of the Supreme Court to cave in to populism (because you believe the winds are now down wind in your favor) is certainly part of the playbook of those seeking to advance the agenda of this issue. In June, the Supreme Court will either reject the intellectually and legally fraudulent notion that sexual behavioral proclivity and/or conduct is a basis for group class equal protection purposes to override the will of the people of various States or the representives laws of various States; or they will right new laws extra-Constitionally and follow the mold of the childish "trimester to determine life" intellectual fraud.

    Art is art, by definition. To subjectively say that it's "good" or "bad" speaks to your bigotry.

    I like how the bigoted Space called Tebow a "tool", which speaks volumes as to the state of his pride and prejudice.   

     




    After the supreme court voted to uphold obamacare I have little respect for them. 

     



    Oh good, at least on the issue of lost respect for the high court we can agree.  For different reasons of course.  i lost the last modicum of respect I had for the Court in the 2000 election.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

     

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

     

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

     

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

     

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

     

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

     

    In response to Flapjack07's comment:

     

    There are still way too many evil, creepy insecure Biblephobes

    The only thing to fear about the Bible (which for the most part is a laugh-fest) is its teachings being forced on others by religious zealosts.

    It is quite creepy for a professional athlete to wait until impending FA to pronounce his current sexual proclivity,

    If his "sexual proclivity" was heterosexual, I doubt his making it known in public would be considered "creepy."

     



    This all boils down to those who don't like christians.  I'm called vile names because I believe marriage is between one man and one woman. 

     

    Because progressives control the country and the media you believe you can bully christians,  you feel empowered.  Have at it.  God is my defender, I have nothing to fear.

     



    Progressives control the country because it is a democracy and the movement of people in this particular democracy tends toward progress:  away from bigotry wrapped in the name of God (blasphemy in its most egregious form) and towards tolerance and undertsanding.  

     

     



    Progressives control this country because we have become a welfare country.  So many people are getting so many free handouts. They of course keep voting in the hand that feeds them. We are progressing towards a socialist nation.  As Margaret Thatcher once said socialism lasts as until you run out of other people's money.  Enjoy what you have while you have it.  Socialism never has worked and it never will.

     

     



    Welp, if you think what we have in this country is anything remotely akin to socialism, its a good thing we dont have a dead red pinko commie like Reagan or Nixon running the show.

     

     




    We are progessing toward socialism, we are not there yet but we are fast approaching.  We are trillions in debt with no end in sight.  Good luck with that.  Look at greece and spain.  Look at states that have a lot of debt. Not good. This is where progressives are taking us.  If we continue on this road we will all be toast.  There will be a level playing field at last but you won't like it.

     

     



    The misconception that social spending is anything more than a minor factor in the debt and the economic collapse is understandable.  It is what has been foisted upon us as the witch to burn in a brazen but wholly unsupportable pitch by the corporate power structure.  

     

     



    You are misinformed.

     



    Good answer.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from 67redsox. Show 67redsox's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

     

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

     

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

     

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

     

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

     

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

     

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

     

    In response to Flapjack07's comment:

     

    There are still way too many evil, creepy insecure Biblephobes

    The only thing to fear about the Bible (which for the most part is a laugh-fest) is its teachings being forced on others by religious zealosts.

    It is quite creepy for a professional athlete to wait until impending FA to pronounce his current sexual proclivity,

    If his "sexual proclivity" was heterosexual, I doubt his making it known in public would be considered "creepy."

     



    This all boils down to those who don't like christians.  I'm called vile names because I believe marriage is between one man and one woman. 

     

    Because progressives control the country and the media you believe you can bully christians,  you feel empowered.  Have at it.  God is my defender, I have nothing to fear.

     



    Progressives control the country because it is a democracy and the movement of people in this particular democracy tends toward progress:  away from bigotry wrapped in the name of God (blasphemy in its most egregious form) and towards tolerance and undertsanding.  

     

     



    Progressives control this country because we have become a welfare country.  So many people are getting so many free handouts. They of course keep voting in the hand that feeds them. We are progressing towards a socialist nation.  As Margaret Thatcher once said socialism lasts as until you run out of other people's money.  Enjoy what you have while you have it.  Socialism never has worked and it never will.

     

     



    Welp, if you think what we have in this country is anything remotely akin to socialism, its a good thing we dont have a dead red pinko commie like Reagan or Nixon running the show.

     

     




    We are progessing toward socialism, we are not there yet but we are fast approaching.  We are trillions in debt with no end in sight.  Good luck with that.  Look at greece and spain.  Look at states that have a lot of debt. Not good. This is where progressives are taking us.  If we continue on this road we will all be toast.  There will be a level playing field at last but you won't like it.

     

     



    The misconception that social spending is anything more than a minor factor in the debt and the economic collapse is understandable.  It is what has been foisted upon us as the witch to burn in a brazen but wholly unsupportable pitch by the corporate power structure.  

     

     



    You are misinformed.

     

     



    Good answer.

     




    Thank-you.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from 67redsox. Show 67redsox's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to softlaw2's comment:

    Same-sex sexual proclivity community. same-sex behavioral proclivity. hahaha. thank you counselor. You crack me up. I appreciate a good semantic pretzel and you bake em up just right.

    What should crack you up is "gay community" "gay people" "gay". I know you appreciate how the same-sex sexual proclivity community self-describes same-sex sexual proclvity as "gay".



    Where did the term 'gay' originate?

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from BosoxJoe5. Show BosoxJoe5's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to softlaw2's comment:

    If his "sexual proclivity" was heterosexual, I doubt his making it known in public would be considered "creepy."

    In fact, publicizing sexual proclivity is creepy on it's face. There is that issue of physical gender, male and female, which goes without saying.



    Any time person mentions their spouse they are speaking proclivity. You can't get a K1 visa if you haven't slept with your partner.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to softlaw2's comment:

     

    If his "sexual proclivity" was heterosexual, I doubt his making it known in public would be considered "creepy."

    In fact, publicizing sexual proclivity is creepy on it's face. There is that issue of physical gender, male and female, which goes without saying.

     



    What you see as publicizing 'sexual proclivity' is not about sex.  It is a political action. A political action made necessary by creeps who shun/castigate or even care about the sexual proclivity of consenting adults.

     

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

    In response to softlaw2's comment:

     

    Same-sex sexual proclivity community. same-sex behavioral proclivity. hahaha. thank you counselor. You crack me up. I appreciate a good semantic pretzel and you bake em up just right.

    What should crack you up is "gay community" "gay people" "gay". I know you appreciate how the same-sex sexual proclivity community self-describes same-sex sexual proclvity as "gay".

     



    Where did the term 'gay' originate?

     



    You tell me.  

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to softlaw2's comment:

     i lost the last modicum of respect I had for the Court in the 2000 election.

    We all agree that Supreme Court makes mistakes for the wrong reasons.

    I guaratnee that if Nixon would have sued the State of Illinois, in 1960, and the Supreme Court gave instructions to the federal trial Court to do fact finding on those voting ballots floating in the Chicago waters, and that fact finding revealed that those votes changed the popular vote in the State of Illinois and resulted in Nixon being certfied as the winner of Illinois electoral votes, and Nixon beat the great philandering Irish Mob progressive at the time, who would now be considered a conservative unless he "evolved", you would have denounced the Supreme Court for allowing the "recount".

    "Progressive" political ideals are typically very tired and old and failed polcies that are regressive. But Leftists like to use words that resonate with the ignorant masses who depend on the State for their food, shelter and birth control and abortion as birth control needs and wants.



    This would run contrary to the voting patterns in modern America.  The poorest states vote Republican and in general have a more right-leaning rhetoric.  I would say its not the 'leftists' (whoever they are, cuz it sure aint corporate shills like Obama), but rather the right wing who uses words that resonate with the proletariat, what you call the 'ignorant masses' (elitist much?) that depend on state support.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from 67redsox. Show 67redsox's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to softlaw2's comment:

     i lost the last modicum of respect I had for the Court in the 2000 election.

    We all agree that Supreme Court makes mistakes for the wrong reasons.

    I guaratnee that if Nixon would have sued the State of Illinois, in 1960, and the Supreme Court gave instructions to the federal trial Court to do fact finding on those voting ballots floating in the Chicago waters, and that fact finding revealed that those votes changed the popular vote in the State of Illinois and resulted in Nixon being certfied as the winner of Illinois electoral votes, and Nixon beat the great philandering Irish Mob progressive at the time, who would now be considered a conservative unless he "evolved", you would have denounced the Supreme Court for allowing the "recount".

    "Progressive" political ideals are typically very tired and old and failed polcies that are regressive. But Leftists like to use words that resonate with the ignorant masses who depend on the State for their food, shelter and birth control and abortion as birth control needs and wants.



    Progressives are running california into the ground.  Companies are leaving for states with friendlier tax laws.  Fewer taxes for california, a state that passes out freebies like candy.  That state is a good example on how the rest of the country is going. 

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from 67redsox. Show 67redsox's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

     

    In response to softlaw2's comment:

     

     i lost the last modicum of respect I had for the Court in the 2000 election.

    We all agree that Supreme Court makes mistakes for the wrong reasons.

    I guaratnee that if Nixon would have sued the State of Illinois, in 1960, and the Supreme Court gave instructions to the federal trial Court to do fact finding on those voting ballots floating in the Chicago waters, and that fact finding revealed that those votes changed the popular vote in the State of Illinois and resulted in Nixon being certfied as the winner of Illinois electoral votes, and Nixon beat the great philandering Irish Mob progressive at the time, who would now be considered a conservative unless he "evolved", you would have denounced the Supreme Court for allowing the "recount".

    "Progressive" political ideals are typically very tired and old and failed polcies that are regressive. But Leftists like to use words that resonate with the ignorant masses who depend on the State for their food, shelter and birth control and abortion as birth control needs and wants.

     



    This would run contrary to the voting patterns in modern America.  The poorest states vote Republican and in general have a more right-leaning rhetoric.  I would say its not the 'leftists' (whoever they are, cuz it sure aint corporate shills like Obama), but rather the right wing who uses words that resonate with the proletariat, what you call the 'ignorant masses' (elitist much?) that depend on state support.

     

     



    The masses are ignorant. Most people have no idea of what's going on in our country or in the world. 

     

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from WCPatsFan. Show WCPatsFan's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    What a joke. Who cares. You are not privileged. Live your life. You don't need to come out. Just be yourself. Screw everyone else.

     

    Thic cartoon sums up the hypocrisy in the media and this country:

     

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from Hetchinspete. Show Hetchinspete's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

    In response to softlaw2's comment:

    Courage would be for an NBA player to say that he's happily married to 5 different women, and not to judge him and be bigoted. Courage would be for an NBA player to say that he wants to marry his first cousin but the State he lives in won't allow it.

    Go for it man.  Let it all out.  

    I feel sorry for the Soft One's first cousin, actually anyone that actually know this troll. 

    Hetch

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: Jason Collins

    In response to 67redsox's comment:

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:

     

    In response to softlaw2's comment:

     

     i lost the last modicum of respect I had for the Court in the 2000 election.

    We all agree that Supreme Court makes mistakes for the wrong reasons.

    I guaratnee that if Nixon would have sued the State of Illinois, in 1960, and the Supreme Court gave instructions to the federal trial Court to do fact finding on those voting ballots floating in the Chicago waters, and that fact finding revealed that those votes changed the popular vote in the State of Illinois and resulted in Nixon being certfied as the winner of Illinois electoral votes, and Nixon beat the great philandering Irish Mob progressive at the time, who would now be considered a conservative unless he "evolved", you would have denounced the Supreme Court for allowing the "recount".

    "Progressive" political ideals are typically very tired and old and failed polcies that are regressive. But Leftists like to use words that resonate with the ignorant masses who depend on the State for their food, shelter and birth control and abortion as birth control needs and wants.

     



    This would run contrary to the voting patterns in modern America.  The poorest states vote Republican and in general have a more right-leaning rhetoric.  I would say its not the 'leftists' (whoever they are, cuz it sure aint corporate shills like Obama), but rather the right wing who uses words that resonate with the proletariat, what you call the 'ignorant masses' (elitist much?) that depend on state support.

     

     



    The masses are ignorant. Most people have no idea of what's going on in our country or in the world. 

     



    Again, I am heartened that we can agree on some things.

     

Share