LESTER straight up for HAMELS makes no sense.. y not for a big outfield BAT?

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from Hfxsoxnut. Show Hfxsoxnut's posts

    Re: LESTER straight up for HAMELS makes no sense.. y not for a big outfield BAT?

    If you lose Lester you don't just need a bat anymore, you need a big time pitcher too.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from GoUconn13. Show GoUconn13's posts

    Re: LESTER straight up for HAMELS makes no sense.. y not for a big outfield BAT?

    it does make sense.   Sox will not lose prospects if they try trading for Hamels.  Good news is that Hammels already have four more years left in his contract and he ll be only 34 years old when his contract run out.  Hammels's contract is only 22 millions dollars a year.  For Lester, he is 31 years old, and who kow he rather to get 6 to 7 years contract.  He ll be 36 to 38 years old when he is in his final year contract.  And also who know that Lester want like 25 millions a year.   That is a huge difference between these two.

    Another thing is that if Lester walks, Sox will get draft pick.  

    It is a huge gain for Boston!!

    But know what, Phillies isnt going to take Lester in return if Lester is in his last year contract.  Phillies will be so stupid if they make this deal!!

     

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from pinstripezac35. Show pinstripezac35's posts

    Re: LESTER straight up for HAMELS makes no sense.. y not for a big outfield BAT?

    LESTER straight up for HAMELS makes no sense..

     

    so Y bring it up

    no one else did

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share