This is how I see it looking:
RF Victorino S
2B Pedroia R
CF Ellsbury L
1B Napoli R
DH Ortiz L
3B Middlebrooks R
C Salty S
LF Gomes R
SS Iglesias R
Bench: Ciriaco, Kalish, Ross, Sands, Nava
Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 2:08 PM EST
This is how I see it looking:
RF Victorino S
2B Pedroia R
CF Ellsbury L
1B Napoli R
DH Ortiz L
3B Middlebrooks R
C Salty S
LF Gomes R
SS Iglesias R
Bench: Ciriaco, Kalish, Ross, Sands, Nava
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 2:24 PM EST
Ells will be moved this winter.
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 2:32 PM EST
It Really matters? Tell me why? Any lineup you can come up with is 2nd rate at best. My grandkids know baseball better than most posting here.
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 2:34 PM EST
Ellsbury
Pedroia
Ortiz
Napoli
Middlebrooks
Victorino
Gomes/Nava
D. Ross
Iggy
:)
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 2:47 PM EST
vs RHPs vs LHPs
1) Ells
2) Pedey Vict
3) Papi Pedey
4) Naps
5) Midd Papi
6) Salty Midd
7) Vict Gomes
8) Nava D Ross
9) Iggy
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 2:47 PM EST
In response to darrylfries' comment:
It Really matters? Tell me why? Any lineup you can come up with is 2nd rate at best. My grandkids know baseball better than most posting here.
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 2:52 PM EST
In response to darrylfries' comment:
It Really matters? Tell me why? Any lineup you can come up with is 2nd rate at best. My grandkids know baseball better than most posting here.
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 2:55 PM EST
In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:
In response to darrylfries' comment:
It Really matters? Tell me why? Any lineup you can come up with is 2nd rate at best. My grandkids know baseball better than most posting here.
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 2:58 PM EST
In response to moonslav59's comment:
In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:
In response to darrylfries' comment:
It Really matters? Tell me why? Any lineup you can come up with is 2nd rate at best. My grandkids know baseball better than most posting here.
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 3:02 PM EST
In response to darrylfries' comment:
It Really matters? Tell me why? Any lineup you can come up with is 2nd rate at best. My grandkids know baseball better than most posting here.
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 3:05 PM EST
Make and batting order you want. All will be failures. We havn't solved the real problem and that was pitching. Gee I forgot Lackey is back. We can count on him for 18 to 20 wins. FOF. Front Office Fools. Great to see you guys supporting this BS.
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 3:16 PM EST
In response to darrylfries' comment:
Make and batting order you want. All will be failures. We havn't solved the real problem and that was pitching. Gee I forgot Lackey is back. We can count on him for 18 to 20 wins. FOF. Front Office Fools. Great to see you guys supporting this BS.
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 3:22 PM EST
NO JUST BEING REALISTIC My time will end when I decide not you. This team will be lucky to win 80 games and you guys want to play childrens games picking lineups. Pick all you want It matters little. All are losers.
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 3:27 PM EST
Victorino NEEDS to bat leadoff and Ellsbury needs to bat 3rd like a bigboy. Only thing missing from lineup is , Hamilton , Stanton or Wil Meyers.
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 3:28 PM EST
In response to darrylfries' comment:
NO JUST BEING REALISTIC My time will end when I decide not you. This team will be lucky to win 80 games and you guys want to play childrens games picking lineups. Pick all you want It matters little. All are losers.
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 3:30 PM EST
I like Iglesias in the minors until he's capable of breaking a .200 BA. They should give Ciriaco a shot as the starting SS.
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 3:37 PM EST
Only thing missing from lineup is , Hamilton , Stanton or Wil Meyers. Someone's smart enough to realize we can't win with the players we have. Hve fun picking your losing lineups. Nobody will remember a loser
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 4:20 PM EST
Although I don't think that any of the lineups posted are lights out but I don't hate them like darry. I only hope that this lineup is strong enough to bury Iggy in it. I wonder if the RS front office thinks so either as I am still hearing SS rumors. I think these line ups will score some runs...the crappy line ups from last year were scoring runs...I just don't think these line ups are going to win many 12-10 games so the RS better find pitching and good pitching at that.
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 4:30 PM EST
Your Right. Not going to win many slugging matches or pitching matches either. Pretty much puts iggys .200 average back iin AAA. I would like them a lot better if the real problem pitching had been at least proped up a little. This is the worst team we've fielded in recent or not so recent memory.
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 4:34 PM EST
In response to darrylfries' comment:
Your Right. Not going to win many slugging matches or pitching matches either. Pretty much puts iggys .200 average back iin AAA. I would like them a lot better if the real problem pitching had been at least proped up a little. This is the worst team we've fielded in recent or not so recent memory.
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 4:39 PM EST
In response to cassvt2004's comment:
This is how I see it looking:
RF Victorino S
2B Pedroia R
CF Ellsbury L
1B Napoli R
DH Ortiz L
3B Middlebrooks R
C Salty S
LF Gomes R
SS Iglesias R
Bench: Ciriaco, Kalish, Ross, Sands, Nava
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 4:51 PM EST
I hate to tell you but our lineup is far from set. I also don't see Salty or Iggy in the organization much longer unless we trade for Dickey, or Iggy watches a bunch of instructional videos on hitting before ST and shows us something. Finally a few people with some baseball smarts
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 4:55 PM EST
In response to cassvt2004's comment:
This is how I see it looking:
RF Victorino S
2B Pedroia R
CF Ellsbury L
1B Napoli R
DH Ortiz L
3B Middlebrooks R
C Salty S
LF Gomes R
SS Iglesias R
Bench: Ciriaco, Kalish, Ross, Sands, Nava
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 4:58 PM EST
In response to TexasPat's comment:
In response to cassvt2004's comment:
This is how I see it looking:
RF Victorino S
2B Pedroia R
CF Ellsbury L
1B Napoli R
DH Ortiz L
3B Middlebrooks R
C Salty S
LF Gomes R
SS Iglesias R
Bench: Ciriaco, Kalish, Ross, Sands, Nava
Re: Lineup pretty much set; Time for batting order
posted at 12/5/2012 5:01 PM EST
In response to TexasPat's comment:
In response to cassvt2004's comment:
This is how I see it looking:
RF Victorino S
2B Pedroia R
CF Ellsbury L
1B Napoli R
DH Ortiz L
3B Middlebrooks R
C Salty S
LF Gomes R
SS Iglesias R
Bench: Ciriaco, Kalish, Ross, Sands, Nava