Little League Lineup Behind Lester

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from ADG. Show ADG's posts

    Little League Lineup Behind Lester

    Get ready for this garbage for tomorrow:

    Scutaro        SS
    Aviles          RF
    Gonzalez      1B
    Pedroia        2B
    Lowrie         3B
    Lavarnway   DH
    Crawford     LF
    Varitek        C
    DMac          CF

    That is one weak lineup. 

    Also, watch and see, when all is said and done, Papi should have gone on the DL. 

    Theo loves to play with a 23-24 man roster.
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from CHUBBIE99. Show CHUBBIE99's posts

    Re: Little League Lineup Behind Lester

    In Response to Little League Lineup Behind Lester:
    Get ready for this garbage for tomorrow: Scutaro        SS Aviles          RF Gonzalez      1B Pedroia        2B Lowrie         3B Lavarnway   DH Crawford     LF Varitek        C DMac          CF That is one weak lineup.  Also, watch and see, when all is said and done, Papi should have gone on the DL.  Theo loves to play with a 23-24 man roster.
    Posted by ADG
    Still better than KC, Lester needs to hold them 2-3 runs. Duffy is rotten they should still score more then a couple of runs.(PS maybe AGON will break out)
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from notin. Show notin's posts

    Re: Little League Lineup Behind Lester

    In Response to Little League Lineup Behind Lester:
    Get ready for this garbage for tomorrow: Scutaro        SS Aviles          RF Gonzalez      1B Pedroia        2B Lowrie         3B Lavarnway   DH Crawford     LF Varitek        C DMac          CF That is one weak lineup.  Also, watch and see, when all is said and done, Papi should have gone on the DL.  Theo loves to play with a 23-24 man roster.
    Posted by ADG


    You're right.

    They should put Ellsbury on the DL, rendering him unavailable for two weeks over being plunked in the back.  But more important here is that the Sox would NOT have to start Darnell McDonald for one night.  It would be way more worth it to have 2 weeks of Ryan Kalish or Brett Carroll instead of Jacoby.

    And why single out Papi for the DL?  The guy is leading the team in several offensive categories, but you want him inelgible for 2 weeks why again?
     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from softylaw. Show softylaw's posts

    Re: Little League Lineup Behind Lester

    With Wakefield, Mac, and Aviles, thats like 10 postal workers to cover a 10 man and 10 women and one transgender town.
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from andrewmitch. Show andrewmitch's posts

    Re: Little League Lineup Behind Lester

    well, it's time for Lester to step it up

    and Ellsbury and Ortiz better get their rest today b/c they better be in the line up on Monday night
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from maxbialystock. Show maxbialystock's posts

    Re: Little League Lineup Behind Lester

    Silly OP.  You would complain if all the big guns were in there because there's still Crawford, Tek, Scutaro, Reddick, etc. 

    I hate that Ellsbury is out because of a HBP, but know the Sox pitchers lead the AL in hitting other teams hitters.  It's not exactly payback, but almost. 

    Lavarnway could be an asset and this is certainly a great opportunity to check him out. 
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from ADG. Show ADG's posts

    Re: Little League Lineup Behind Lester

    In Response to Re: Little League Lineup Behind Lester:
    In Response to Little League Lineup Behind Lester : You're right. They should put Ellsbury on the DL, rendering him unavailable for two weeks over being plunked in the back.  But more important here is that the Sox would NOT have to start Darnell McDonald for one night.  It would be way more worth it to have 2 weeks of Ryan Kalish or Brett Carroll instead of Jacoby. And why single out Papi for the DL?  The guy is leading the team in several offensive categories, but you want him inelgible for 2 weeks why again?
    Posted by notin


    Because when all is said and done, he's going to be ineligable for at least 12 games anyway.  Do the math yourself.
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from notin. Show notin's posts

    Re: Little League Lineup Behind Lester

    In Response to Re: Little League Lineup Behind Lester:
    In Response to Re: Little League Lineup Behind Lester : Because when all is said and done, he's going to be ineligable for at least 12 games anyway.  Do the math yourself.
    Posted by ADG


    Inelgible?  And why is Ellsbury ineligible?
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from BurritoT. Show BurritoT's posts

    Re: Little League Lineup Behind Lester

    Even though Crawford has been awful, sandwiching him between a bunch of nobodys at the mid-bottom of the line-up is ridiculous. He should bat 2nd (in front of Gonzales) or even lead-off.
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from soxdawg08. Show soxdawg08's posts

    Re: Little League Lineup Behind Lester

    In Response to Re: Little League Lineup Behind Lester:
    well, it's time for Lester to step it up and Ellsbury and Ortiz better get their rest today b/c they better be in the line up on Monday night
    Posted by andrewmitch


    And if they're not, will you suspend them w/o pay?  
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from andrewmitch. Show andrewmitch's posts

    Re: Little League Lineup Behind Lester

    Nope, I would just put their names in the line up and be done with it.

    If they walked out then we got a union problem.
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from dgalehouse. Show dgalehouse's posts

    Re: Little League Lineup Behind Lester

    In Response to Re: Little League Lineup Behind Lester:
    well, it's time for Lester to step it up and Ellsbury and Ortiz better get their rest today b/c they better be in the line up on Monday night
    Posted by andrewmitch

    Absolutely. And in Ortiz' case , if he cannot play in Texas , then he should have been on the D.L.  Cannot continue to play short handed.
     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share