Re: Memo to
posted at 5/4/2013 3:02 PM EDT
In response to Kingface12's comment:
In response to southpaw777's comment:
In response to Hetchinspete's comment:
Good mornin King, South and Notin,
There is omething here I just fail to understand You are all smart folks and rabbid Red Sox who whether I agree on your points of view here is not the important issue because I respect all. My point is you all sound frustrated by trying to reason with Bill who will all know constantly presents baseless points of view, silly trade ideas or just rambles on about nothingness. My question is why bother refuting. Put the manboy on IGNORE and forget about him. You'll find it simplifies you life on BDC so you have more time to converse online with others who actually make valid points.
Just my suggestion. I still read Bill806, Idiots00007, the Great Soft One, etc in parts of your emails occasionally or log off to read their silliness but with the exception of my toying with them with my wit, however useless that is I don't waste my time reasoning with those who don't have a lick of common sense.
Geo tends to be overly negative sometimes but at least I can reason with him, although we rarely agree on much. Conan's another story all together.
The Hetch One
Not at all the situation. Every once in a while I have actually got Bill to get a little deeper with his baseball discussion. I dont expect it, but its never frustrating to me to every once in a while try.
Guys like Me, King, steven, jimfred, Notin and yourself are able to take a thread like this and spin it into a reasonable realistic view of the situation as well as branch it out to involve other areas like me and king did with Vasquez and the catching situation.
turning a negative into a positive.
Great post South.
Hi South, Face and Notin,
I agree with South to some extent. Yes Bill does occasionally bring up a point but if I took the time go over his many, many posts per day my best guess is that 90% are repetative stuff that I just don't have time or the desire to read, or what I refer to a pointless jibberish. I don't want to waste my time filtering through all to find that one point. I would rather Ignore Bill and the others that in my view are not worth reading or responding to so that I've time to respond to those who I do respect and can actually carry on a decent "online" conversation with even if we don't always agree.
Bill's latest retort is that he gets a lot of action. That's wonderful for Bill but I'd say the vast majority of responders are those who view Bill and his writings as junk mail. I don't see the point. My view is that Bill probably does know a lot about the game but like a few other just gets his jollies by jostling with us on BDC.
Again just my perspective on things.