Re: Mike Carp,do the sox claim him?
posted at 2/13/2013 2:59 PM EST
Follow it through, clown. If he clears waivers, it means nobody wants hin on their 25 man roster. That doesn't mean much for your "blather" about him needing to "agree to a minor league contract" as an "unrestricted FA".
He agrees or retires.
(BTW, Carp is still pre-arb, so his "arb clock" is not ticking yet. It might be nice to get at least even one small part of a post correct.)
Follow it through, Stooge. I said "unless he becomes a FA and agrees to a minor league contract", and you pontificate by repeating some cut and paste narrative extrapolated from someone else from he CBA. You, of all people, trolling by and injecting an angry rant from an insecure imbedded Board shill.
Carp is out of options, has over two yeas, and is approachng the last 3 years of service arbitation, you bugaboo injecting captious stooge. The Mariners have designated him as trash.
And your guy Overbay is what? Filet Mignon?
I didn't repeat some CBA narrative, I cut and pasted from your own jibberish. Here's an example:
"If he costs near zero and can be sent to minors at anytime. So, no, the Sox should not claim him. "
Does this really make sense to you? Tell us just what this means. Your first sentence isn't even a sentence.
(Try and answer the question instead of responding in "captious blather".)