My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
-
My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/14/2012 5:56 PM EST
My guess is our positional player roster is just about set, so I will begin my annual Sox positional projections at this time. I may adjust my projections after ST.Preliminary Notes: It is interesting to see that the MLB third base position has fallen so low offensively. It has declined to the point where the MLB catcher position is about even with 3B. SSs & 2Bmen have equal or higher BA and OBP with 3Bmen. LF has also decline to a point where they are outslugged by CF'ers (maybe thanks in large part to Jacoby). Also, RF almost outslugged 1Bmen in 2011.Stat Notes: I got my stats from fangraphs and baseball reference. Although I weigh OPS as the most important stat, I recognize that OBP is more important to generating runs than Slg%. My numbers are based on no injuries and no call-ups. I am assuming Iggy and Lava are in AAA. I know they will probably get some PAs in MLB this year, but I am keeping it simple here.Catcher:MLB '11: .245/.314/.390/.704Sox '11: .229/.291/.446/.737Salty (384) .236 16 56 (.289/.452/.741)VTek (250) .221 11 36 (.300/.423/.723)Although the Sox placed 10th in catcher OPS, we were 24th in OBP (5th in Slg%). Our catchers hit 29 HRs (1 away from 2nd place) and had 100 RBIs (2nd in MLB). A pretty productive season overall, even though there was a sharp dip in September.With the departure of VTek (who actually had a higher OBP than Salty), one might expect a decline in overall offense from the catcher position this year. However, Tito never used a L-R catcher platoon last year, but instead used the personal caddy method. I expect that Bobby V will give Salty the chance to catch everyone and stick more to the L-R methodology. If he does this, we will see better numbers from Salty, since he hits RHPs much better (2011: .247/.304/.481/.786), and better numbers vs LHPs, since Shoppach hits LHPs very well:(Career: .274/.373/.536/.909).2012 Projections:Salty (450) .250 20 75 (.310/.490/.800)Shop (200) .250 10 25 (.350/.450/.800)Sox: (650) .250 30 100 (.325/.475/.800) +.094First Base:MLB '11: .263/.338/.439/.778Sox '11: .329/.402/.541/.944AGon (715) .338 27 117 (.410/.548/.957)AGon had a great season, but I expect this year to be even better. We placed 4th in 1B OPS last season. I expect less BA, but more power at 1B this year. I know AGon will not get all the PAs at 1B, but for easier calculations, I will set it up this way. Here' my 2012 projection:AGon/Sox: (720) .300 45 140 (.410/.590/1.000) +.056Second base:MLB '11: .255/.316/.378/.694Sox '11: .308/.388/.474/.862Pedroia (731) .307 21 91 (.387/.474/.861)We had the best OPS in MLB at 2B last year. I expect the same in 2012. Go Pedey, Go!Pedey/Sox: (740) .300 20 100 (.395/.475/.870) +.008Third Base:MLB '11: .254/.314/.391/.705Sox '11: .270/.362/.449/.812Youk (517) .258/.373/.459/.833Lowrie (133 @ 3B) .275/.326/.433/.759This is a tough position to call this year. Since I am assuming 100% health, I am going to project a big improvemnet here, but I will not give Youk all the PAs. Youk had seen his OPS improve every season of his career until last year's steep decling. I will put him closer to his 2010 numbers than 2011's:Youk: (600) .300 20 100 (.400/.540/.940)Punto: (100) .250 0 15 (.325/.325/.650)Sox: (700) .290 20 115 (.390/.510/.900) +.088Short Stop:MLB '11: .258/.314/.370/.684Sox '11: .279/.330/.401/.730Scutaro: (445) .299 7 54 (.358/.423/.781)Lowrie (@SS): (187) .238/.278/.360/.639With the departure of Scooty, this is a tough call. Personally, I'd like to see Iggy as the FT SS, and we'd see a huge drop in SS OPs if we did, but I am going to give Aviles the nod at SS this year with help from Punto (I won't count Iggy). Here are my 2012 SS projections:Aviles: (550) .290 10 60 (.325/.415/.740)Punto: (100) .250 0 15 (.325/.325/.650)Sox: (650) .290 10 75 (.330/.400/.710) -.020Left Field:MLB '11: .256/.320/.409/.729Sox '11: .258/.304/.419/.723Crawford: (538) .255 11 56 (.289/.405/.694)Reddick (63) & DMac (50): .260 4 13 (.330/.490/.820)I'm expecting CC to return to about somewhere between his career norm and his most recent years in TB. My hope is that Bobby V sits CC vs tough lefties, but I doubt that happens. CC should get his normal rest vs lefties and will miss a few games at the start of the season. It's another tough call, but here it is (I am assuming almost all of DMac's PAs are vs LHPs):Crawford: (600) .290 12 85 (.350/.460/.810)Dar. Mac: (100) .275 6 15 (.340/.470/.810)Sox LF Total: .285 18 100 (.345/.465/.800) +.077Center Field:MLB '11: .261/.325/.406/.731Sox '11: .316/.371/.548/.918Ellsbury: (729) .321 32 105 (.376/.552/.928)I am projecting that Jacoby will come close to his 2011 numbers.Sox: (770) .320 30 100 (.380/.530/.910) -.008Right Field:MLB '11: .263/.335/.429/.765Sox '11: .233/.299/.353/.652Drew (270) .231 4 22 (.322/.316/.638)Redd (192) .257 3 13 (.302/.374/.676)DMac (86) .256 4 14 (.314/.487/.801)Cam (84) .171 3 8 (.226/.316/.542)2011 saw a big mix of players in RF. The .652 OPS in RF was 113 points below the league average. Since RF has become one of the best hitting positions in MLb of late, this is totally unacceptable. Many will disagree with Ben on not assigning a top priority status to getting a RH'd slugger RF'er, but I think those posters will be surprised by the steep improvement in our RF production this year. Cody Ross has incredible numbers vs LHPs and not bad numbers vs RHPs as well, and Sweeney does very well vs righties. My guess is that Bobby V will play Ross vs all lefties and about half the RHPs that Ross has a good history against. I know many here do not like or are not familar with successful platoons, but I see this working out nicely for the Sox. Here are some telling numbers:Career:Ross (per 630 PA): .265 23 88 (.323/.456/.779)vs LHP: .282 38 120 (.349/.563/.912)vs RHP: .253 18 75 (.313/.414/.727)Sweeney (per 630 PAs)vs RHPs: .296 6 70 (.352/.402/.754)If we can give Ross 220 PAs vs LHPs and 200 vs RHPs, and give Sweeney 220 vs RHPs and 30 vs LHPs, their overall numbers might look like this:C Ross (420) .270 25 90 (.335/.490/.825)Sween (250) .290 2 35 (.340/.390/.730)Total Sox: (670) .280 27 125 (.335/.440/.775) +.123Designated Hitter:MLB '11: .268/.342/.431/.773Sox '11: .308/.394/.531/.925D Ortiz: (605) .309 29 96 (.398/.554/.953)Papi turns 37 in November. He put up some nice numbers in 2011, although his RBI total was a bit low for a line-up like the Sox had last year. I'm going to project a drop off in 2012:Sox: (680) .275 25 120 (.375/.525/.900) -.025Overall, it looks like we will see some big gains at some slots, and just a few positions where we stay about even of lose ground:RF: +.123C: +.0943B: +.088LF: +.0771B: +.0562B: +.008CF: -.008SS: -.020DH: -.025Overall: ~ + .035 in OPSI realize my numbers are based on some shaky ground, such as no injuries and projected platoon L-R splits, but I do feel like our offense has a strong potential to improve over 2011. RF should easily improve, while guessing that Youk and CC's improvements are a bit more speculative. Losses at SS, DH and CF might be much larger that I showed, but I find it hard to believe our overall OPS will be lower this year than 2011. -
This post has been removed.
-
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/14/2012 8:23 PM EST
Think your projections are generally quite reasonable and realistic with the exception of catcher, shortstop and right field which are obviously the three major question marks heading into the season. Your objective projections with the assumptions cited may be overly optimistic, but there's nothing wrong with that. Baseball is the most unpredictable pro sport, but it's a fun excercise to try to come up with a profile based on past performance.
You did not project the pitching staff which is really more difficult than it is for position players, but if you looked at statistical patterns and trends, you would have to come to the conclusion that Lester will have another solid year comparable to his recent seasons, but that Beckett will not based on "never" putting together strong back to back seasons since he came up to the big leagues. Good year/bad year has been his pattern for whatever reason. -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/14/2012 8:48 PM EST
In Response to Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections:Think your projections are generally quite reasonable and realistic with the exception of catcher, shortstop and right field which are obviously the three major question marks heading into the season. Your objective projections with the assumptions cited may be overly optimistic, but there's nothing wrong with that. Baseball is the most unpredictable pro sport, but it's a fun excercise to try to come up with a profile based on past performance.I do think Bobby V will use the L/R platoon more that Tito, and I realize that the SS position may take a big dip if Iggy plays or if Aviles does not rise to the occaison. Salty and Shopp are hard to call, but I have confidence in my RF projection even though Ross has declined in recent years, he is moving from big parks to Fenway.You did not project the pitching staff which is really more difficult than it is for position players, but if you looked at statistical patterns and trends, you would have to come to the conclusion that Lester will have another solid year comparable to his recent seasons, but that Beckett will not based on "never" putting together strong back to back seasons since he came up to the big leagues. Good year/bad year has been his pattern for whatever reason.I will do a pitching projection later. I think Ben is not done building the staff.
Posted by WilcyMoore -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/14/2012 8:53 PM EST
Clay might be the key to it all.... -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/14/2012 9:40 PM EST
In Response to Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections:Clay might be the key to it all....
Posted by georom4Yes, and maybe how the Bard/Aceves as starter experiment works is a close second. -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/15/2012 1:37 AM EST
I stopped reading after your 2011 projections for David Ortiz, v LP. -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/15/2012 11:24 AM EST
m -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/15/2012 11:34 AM EST
Definitely a lot of info....
A couple area's where I think you may be a bit optimistic 1. 30 HR out of Salty and Shoppach. 2. Ellsbury matching his 2011. I'd probably knock the average down closer to .300, with 20ish HR and a 370 OBP, still a very solid year. 3. Agone is going to hit 45.... I hope so. 4. Cody Ross is going to hit 25 HR? If that is the case I'll be reminding everyone all year long that I was on him in November!! -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/15/2012 11:44 AM EST
Nice thread Moon! Everything you say sounds reasonable, but I don't think it will all come together for us - if Crawford bounces back, somebody else will have a disappointing season or an injury. Most likely areas to drop off are SS (if we emphasize defense) CF (If Ellsbury looks more like pre-2011) and DH (if Ortiz shows his age or last year's success against lefties proves a fluke). -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/15/2012 12:31 PM EST
m -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/15/2012 1:05 PM EST
In Response to Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections:Nice thread Moon! Everything you say sounds reasonable, but I don't think it will all come together for us - if Crawford bounces back, somebody else will have a disappointing season or an injury. Most likely areas to drop off are SS (if we emphasize defense) CF (If Ellsbury looks more like pre-2011) and DH (if Ortiz shows his age or last year's success against lefties proves a fluke).
Posted by slomagI agree someone will drop off, but it is hard to project it. I am assuming 100% health and a RF and catcher L-R Platoon. I know this may not happen, but it's hard to project a specific injury.I agree I may have overstated Jacoby's 2012, and Papi could decline sharply as well. Youk's injury is a key. Ross is hard to call, but I think Fenway will help, and he will be starting vs every LHPs we face. -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/15/2012 1:58 PM EST
I think we're going to see a drop from Ellsbury - he'll still be very good, but we'll regret not trading him this winter. I'd say he's about 60 OPS points lower in 2012.I predict Ross will get off to a hot start, getting more playing time while Crawford is out. Crawford, having missed all of Spring Training and jumping right into the uncomfortable hot-bed from last year, will struggle again to start the year. As a result, Ross will see more playing time early in the year, and will become a fan favorite, but the result will be that Sweeney is never really given a fair shot, and Ross cools off because he is facing more RHs than he should.Kalish (when he returns to full health) and Lavarnway will destroy AAA pitching, and will slide into the Sweeney and Shoppach roles by July. Iglesias will improve, but not to the point where he can replace Aviles / Punto in the stretch run. -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/15/2012 2:58 PM EST
Sweeney should end up playing vs almost all RHPs, and will play vs both until CC returns. We should know more about him and Ross by that time. I have high hopes for Ross, but admit, he could stumble. His recent decline may not just be park-related.Your thought on trading Jacoby while his stock was high could be true, and I feel the same about trading Salty too. I like Lava better anyway, and there are many teams looking for a hitting catcher. -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/15/2012 4:00 PM EST
In Response to Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections:Sweeney should end up playing vs almost all RHPs, and will play vs both until CC returns. We should know more about him and Ross by that time. I have high hopes for Ross, but admit, he could stumble. His recent decline may not just be park-related. Your thought on trading Jacoby while his stock was high could be true, and I feel the same about trading Salty too. I like Lava better anyway, and there are many teams looking for a hitting catcher.
Posted by moonslav59I see Salty as more likely to improve in 2012 - you take away the first 6 weeks of the season (when he was forced into a pressure-cooker, was told he couldn't hack it a week into the season, and had just become a new father) and he has an 800 OPS. I don't see any reason he can't improve on that coming into his prime years.I like Lava better too, but his bat is so promising, I almost don't want to see him at full-time catcher. If this is Ortiz's last season, a Lavarnway / Salty combination could work on many levels for years to come. -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/15/2012 4:17 PM EST
In Response to Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections:In Response to Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections : I see Salty as more likely to improve in 2012 - you take away the first 6 weeks of the season (when he was forced into a pressure-cooker, was told he couldn't hack it a week into the season, and had just become a new father) and he has an 800 OPS. I don't see any reason he can't improve on that coming into his prime years. I like Lava better too, but his bat is so promising, I almost don't want to see him at full-time catcher. If this is Ortiz's last season, a Lavarnway / Salty combination could work on many levels for years to come.
Posted by slomagSalty's season was a perfect bell shape. He peaked in June and ended like he started:.945.756 .893.547 .749.542April/May OPS: ~.656June/July OPS: ~.915Aug/Sept OPS: ~.646I'm not writing Salty off. Like I said, he's the same age now, that VTek was when he became the FT catcher. I am just high on Lava, and i think trading Salty at his high point makes sense. -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/15/2012 10:56 PM EST
m -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/15/2012 11:21 PM EST
m -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/16/2012 12:02 AM EST
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/16/2012 8:31 AM EST
In Response to My 2012 Positional Sox Projections:2012 Projections:
Salty (450) .250 20 75
AGon: (720) .300 45 140
Crawford: (600) .290 12 85
C Ross (420) .270 25 90
Posted by moonslav59
Looking at the above predictions, can I have some of what you're smoking? -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/16/2012 10:56 AM EST
m -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/16/2012 9:07 PM EST
Looking at the above predictions, can I have some of what you're smoking?
He is smoking Wakefield's new forced retirement. -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/17/2012 8:36 AM EST
In Response to My 2012 Positional Sox Projections:2012 Projections:
Salty (450) .250 20 75
AGon: (720) .300 45 140
Crawford: (600) .290 12 85
C Ross (420) .270 25 90
Posted by moonslav59
Looking at the above predictions, can I have some of what you're smoking?I am sure one or more of these 4 listed players will not meet my projections, but I feel they are totally realistic within the context given.Salty was not platooned L-R last year. Instead, Tito used the personal caddy method. I am guessing Bobby V will know better. If you look at Salty's numbers vs RHPs last year (.247 11 39 in 263 PAs). and you give him about 150 more PAs vs just righties while taking away 75 PAs vs lefties (.209 5 17 in 123 PAs), you'll see my projection is not extreme. I could go with .245 20 75 as reasonable as well.AGon should show more power this year, so I prject less BA and more HRs and 2Bs. I know the RBI total looks high, but with Pedey and Jacoby on base...CC's numbers are actually less than his last 2 seasons in TB, so I do not think they are outlandish.Ross' numbers were based on career stats, not recent ones. I realize I went out on a limb here, but I think he will be greatly helped by Fenway and having good hitters around him.No wacky weed here. -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/17/2012 12:37 PM EST
m -
Re: My 2012 Positional Sox Projections
posted at 2/17/2012 4:42 PM EST
In Response to My 2012 Positional Sox Projections:
.
Posted by moonslav59[/QUOTE
Injuries and pitching will more than likely be the real keys again moon but I agree on most predictions.