Re: NEWS FLASH - In case you haven't noticed Ellsbury is having one of the greatest years ever for a lead off batter!
posted at 9/25/2011 1:34 AM EDT
In Response to Re: NEWS FLASH - In case you haven't noticed Ellsbury is having one of the greatest years ever for a lead off batter!
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: NEWS FLASH - In case you haven't noticed Ellsbury is having one of the greatest years ever for a lead off batter! : Is this how you would bring it up expitch, basically say " I have said that the case against him is not compelling, which means, as of now, "not guilty ". That is some great sports writing if that would be your approach. Sports writers have a different responsibility. Addressing the issue from both sides is their responsibility. There is nothing wrong with addressing the issue. There is nothing wrong with virtually any or the sports reporter articles on this subject IMO. I haven't read a single sports writer accuse him of PED use. I have read a lot of articles discussing the facts regarding this issue. For example, he started hitting HR at a faster pace in late 2009. He has always had pop but mainly didn't connect well. There have been lots of comments supporting his situation. He has been treated quite well IMO. I said he was under suspicion and then had to go through 2-3 pages of grief over it. YOU don't want it brought it up.
Posted by Boomerangsdotcom[/QUOTE]
You lost it a long way back on this topic, even before your "last post," and have continued to make matters worse for yourself. You habitually misrepresent what people say, repeat yourself ad nauseam, market red herrings, get tangled in your own contorted language, scream in print, and then bleat "You don't want it brought it." Do you think other readers here are stupid -- or just me -- and haven't been able to follow the course of this thread -- if they have even bothered? When all else fails, as it does time after time, you whip out your absurd vocabulary of personal denigration: dumb, stupid, no, make that stupidest. I have said that you don't read well and are a sloppy writer. The evidence for that judgment is clear cut, as opposed to that against Bautista.
And you know all of my motives, from seeking revenge over a petty disagreement to wanting to stuff the topic of steroids entirely. Sad, really.
In short, you went off the rails on this subject with your crude and irresponsible original post and have been slipping your wheels in wet turf ever since.
For the third time, I say take Moon's advice. Ice it.