Derek Jeter: "Kate Upton, let's take my private jet and spend the weekend in Paris."

Me: "Kate Upton, let's take my car and grab lunch at Quincy Market."

Kate Upton: "I have decided to go with Jeter."  

LOL

This post has been removed.

man..kate upton is solid..but alyssa miller is damn fine...

 all the women I posted readily posed for the pictures, none were taken advantage of as far as i can see, you seem to be the only one here melting down over any of this.

1. It's you who are "melting down"

2. My simple point is that these women voluntarily sell sexual objectifcation images, as they should be able to do, but have no business pretending that anyone is else is responsible for their commercial sexual objectification.

3. You are posting images that are a violation of intellectual property rights of the owners who bought them.

4. I don't care what you post, I just don't like hypocritical censorship or women complaining that somoene else is responsible for the sexual objectification.

5. Thank you for getting so bent out of shape over my comments;)  

In response to softlaw2's comment:

 

 all the women I posted readily posed for the pictures, none were taken advantage of as far as i can see, you seem to be the only one here melting down over any of this.

1. It's you who are "melting down"

2. My simple point is that these women voluntarily sell sexual objectifcation images, as they should be able to do, but have no business pretending that anyone is else is responsible for their commercial sexual objectification.

3. You are posting images that are a violation of intellectual property rights of the owners who bought them.

4. I don't care what you post, I just don't like hypocritical censorship or women complaining that somoene else is responsible for the sexual objectification.

5. Thank you for getting so bent out of shape over my comments;)  

 

 

 

Everyone I know who works for a wage sells themselves to someone else in one way or another.

These girls are no different.  They have no expectations after the photo shoot other than monetary compensation. You are simply repulsed by the photos.

Your big problem is, which for the life of me I cannot understand, as deep and complex as you try to make it is that you basically object to seeing beautiful young babes showing off their assets.

Bottom line is you come off as a first rate kookamonga and you're the only one here who doesn't think so.

With your intellectual property rights argument, if it bothers you that much turn me in to the authorities.

Here, more violations just to get under your skin:

 

 

 

Kate Upton, I want to show you my love.  LOL

In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

Now that, my friend, crosses the line into soft porn.  :-)

 

In response to Ice-Cream's comment:

Is she the only upton Atlanta is yet to sign?

In response to bald-predictions' comment:

Heh...yeah, she would really fill out their outfield.

 

In response to Ice-Cream's comment:

LOL...don't feel bad IC, you gotta approach the plate in order to strike out :-)

 

Hey baldpredictions  :)

If the Braves sign Kate Upton, then they will make sure that she has a no-trade clause.  LOL

 

Hey jete02fan  :)

I would probably strike out in three pitches.  LOL

In response to jete02fan's comment:

LOL...i would (pop out)on the 1st pitch...LOL

In response to softlaw2's comment:

how many of these women posed for this magazine then turned around and protested that they are being objectified??

 

More swimsuit pics.....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let me know if anyone wants any speedo pics.

Personally, I'm not a fan of the speedo, but I'll be happy to oblige.   ;-)

 

Oh, and since it is a baseball forum......

Some pics of the Jones boys.

 

 

 

 

LMAO kimmi

but please no speedos

This post has been removed.

 

Fair enough RedSoxKimmi.   :)

Bo 1979 A 10.......

 

Another OBG.

In response to ThatWasMe's comment:

 

Kimmi, ok we'll give you brief (no pun intended) equal time here.

But please keep in mind:

"these women  men voluntarily sell sexual objectifcation images, as they should be able to do, but have no business pretending that anyone is else is responsible for their commercial sexual objectification."

Furthermore:

"You are posting images that are a violation of intellectual property rights of the owners who bought them."

[/QUOTE]

LOL TWM

only here could this type of thread last start a argument