Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from slasher9. Show slasher9's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    Game 8


    Grady 3-4 / 1xbh / 1RS

    Ells 3-4 / 1xbh / 1RS / 1SB (winner)

    cant get much closer than this but the SB pushes JE over the top.

    GS 1

    JE 6

    tie 1

     

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from pinstripezac35. Show pinstripezac35's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    In response to slasher9's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Game 8


    Grady 3-4 / 1xbh / 1RS

    Ells 3-4 / 1xbh / 1RS / 1SB (winner)

    cant get much closer than this but the SB pushes JE over the top.

    GS 1

    JE 6

    tie 1

     

    [/QUOTE]

    not accordingly 2 R favorite statgirl

    but that's 4 another thread

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from DirtyWaterLover. Show DirtyWaterLover's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games


    I thought JBJ was Ellsbury's replacement.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from slasher9. Show slasher9's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    Game 9

    Grady DNP (Pinch Runner)

    Ells 0-4 (winner)

     

    JE 7

    GS 1

    tie 1

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    Maybe we should add JBJ to the mix since he will be playing in CF this year as well...Just a thought.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from seannybboi. Show seannybboi's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    In response to southpaw777's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Maybe we should add JBJ to the mix since he will be playing in CF this year as well...Just a thought.

    [/QUOTE]

    I wish I had done that.  My fault.  

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    In response to seannybboi's comment:

    In response to southpaw777's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Maybe we should add JBJ to the mix since he will be playing in CF this year as well...Just a thought.



    I wish I had done that.  My fault.  

    [/QUOTE]


    only 8 games in seanny...why dont we start it now?

    we can combine our CF production vs. Ells

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from maxbialystock. Show maxbialystock's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    Right now, with the Sox at Yankees for 4 games series ahead of us, Bradley and Sizemore both have higher OPS's than Ellsbury.  Plus Bradley, in a lot fewer at bats, had more runs scored and more rbi's than Ellsbury. 

    But back to the OP and the notion of game by game evaluations.  Last night Ellsbury didn't just go 0 or 4, he did much worse than that.  Batting 3d, he came up in the bottom of the 8th with the game tied, Gardner on 3B (who doubled and was sacrificed to 3B by Jeter) and one out.  Ellsbury popped up harmlessly to 3B when a grounder to the right side or up the middle or fly ball would have brought Gardner home with the go ahead run. 

    I think Bradley is a legitimate addition to this story because so far I think he is the only guy to start in CF besides Sizemore.  Yesterday, for example, he played CF, walked 3 times, and scored 2 runs, clearly outplaying Ellsbury, who, we should note, was the Yankees DH.  Theoretically, we should compare Jacoby to Big Papi, but that would be too hard on the Yankees side. 

    Overall, I think Ellsbury is still definitely a plus for the Yankees and one they can certainly afford, so I don't buy the money argument. 

    But I kind of like the thread in terms of determining how well Cherington has made up for the loss of Ellsbury.  So far, it certainly seems to me, so good. 

    But we are still way, way early in this season. 

     

     

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    In response to slasher9's comment:

     

    Game 8


    Grady 3-4 / 1xbh / 1RS

    Ells 3-4 / 1xbh / 1RS / 1SB (winner)

    cant get much closer than this but the SB pushes JE over the top.

    GS 1

    JE 6

    tie 1

     


    Will Ellsbury get any extra points, for receiving his World Championship ring, this weekend?Tongue Out

     

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from pumpsie-green. Show pumpsie-green's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    In response to maxbialystock's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Right now, with the Sox at Yankees for 4 games series ahead of us, Bradley and Sizemore both have higher OPS's than Ellsbury.  Plus Bradley, in a lot fewer at bats, had more runs scored and more rbi's than Ellsbury. 

    But back to the OP and the notion of game by game evaluations.  Last night Ellsbury didn't just go 0 or 4, he did much worse than that.  Batting 3d, he came up in the bottom of the 8th with the game tied, Gardner on 3B (who doubled and was sacrificed to 3B by Jeter) and one out.  Ellsbury popped up harmlessly to 3B when a grounder to the right side or up the middle or fly ball would have brought Gardner home with the go ahead run. 

    I think Bradley is a legitimate addition to this story because so far I think he is the only guy to start in CF besides Sizemore.  Yesterday, for example, he played CF, walked 3 times, and scored 2 runs, clearly outplaying Ellsbury, who, we should note, was the Yankees DH.  Theoretically, we should compare Jacoby to Big Papi, but that would be too hard on the Yankees side. 

    Overall, I think Ellsbury is still definitely a plus for the Yankees and one they can certainly afford, so I don't buy the money argument. 

    But I kind of like the thread in terms of determining how well Cherington has made up for the loss of Ellsbury.  So far, it certainly seems to me, so good. 

    But we are still way, way early in this season. 

     

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Remember: putting Ellsbury in CF did not occur in a vacumn. He replaced their regular CF, Granderson, who the lost. Ellsurby (OOPS) has a career OPS/OPS+ of .790/108, Granderson is at .827/116-and he has a better arm in CF. Not sure how much the Yankees really improved their team with that acquisition.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from BosoxJoe5. Show BosoxJoe5's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    In response to pumpsie-green's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to maxbialystock's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Right now, with the Sox at Yankees for 4 games series ahead of us, Bradley and Sizemore both have higher OPS's than Ellsbury.  Plus Bradley, in a lot fewer at bats, had more runs scored and more rbi's than Ellsbury. 

    But back to the OP and the notion of game by game evaluations.  Last night Ellsbury didn't just go 0 or 4, he did much worse than that.  Batting 3d, he came up in the bottom of the 8th with the game tied, Gardner on 3B (who doubled and was sacrificed to 3B by Jeter) and one out.  Ellsbury popped up harmlessly to 3B when a grounder to the right side or up the middle or fly ball would have brought Gardner home with the go ahead run. 

    I think Bradley is a legitimate addition to this story because so far I think he is the only guy to start in CF besides Sizemore.  Yesterday, for example, he played CF, walked 3 times, and scored 2 runs, clearly outplaying Ellsbury, who, we should note, was the Yankees DH.  Theoretically, we should compare Jacoby to Big Papi, but that would be too hard on the Yankees side. 

    Overall, I think Ellsbury is still definitely a plus for the Yankees and one they can certainly afford, so I don't buy the money argument. 

    But I kind of like the thread in terms of determining how well Cherington has made up for the loss of Ellsbury.  So far, it certainly seems to me, so good. 

    But we are still way, way early in this season. 

     

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Remember: putting Ellsbury in CF did not occur in a vacumn. He replaced their regular CF, Granderson, who the lost. Ellsurby (OOPS) has a career OPS/OPS+ of .790/108, Granderson is at .827/116-and he has a better arm in CF. Not sure how much the Yankees really improved their team with that acquisition.

    [/QUOTE]

    The fact that he can turn any single or BB is not factofed in OPS. So what would his SUG be if every single and stale was counted as a double?

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from jete02fan. Show jete02fan's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    In response to southpaw777's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to seannybboi's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Maybe we should add JBJ to the mix since he will be playing in CF this year as well...Just a thought.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    I wish I had done that.  My fault.  

     

    [/QUOTE]


    only 8 games in seanny...why dont we start it now?

    we can combine our CF production vs. Ells

    [/QUOTE] jeez..calling in the cavalry already?? Tongue OutWink


     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from slasher9. Show slasher9's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    In response to jete02fan's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    [/QUOTE]


    only 8 games in seanny...why dont we start it now?

    we can combine our CF production vs. Ells

    [/QUOTE] jeez..calling in the cavalry already?? Tongue OutWink


    [/QUOTE]

    part of the fun of this thread was to see which player would actually lace them up more and when they do then stats.  i will say that the head-to-head should continue even on nights when GS plays LF as he is tonight or when JE dh's.  thus far it is a one-sided bludgeoning but i expect GS to make a run soon.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from jete02fan. Show jete02fan's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    In response to slasher9's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to jete02fan's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    [/QUOTE]


    only 8 games in seanny...why dont we start it now?

    we can combine our CF production vs. Ells

    [/QUOTE] jeez..calling in the cavalry already?? Tongue OutWink


    [/QUOTE]

    part of the fun of this thread was to see which player would actually lace them up more and when they do then stats.  i will say that the head-to-head should continue even on nights when GS plays LF as he is tonight or when JE dh's.  thus far it is a one-sided bludgeoning but i expect GS to make a run soon.

    [/QUOTE]hopefully Size will be considerate and wait til Monday :-)


     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from RigatoniT. Show RigatoniT's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    A healthy Sizemore negates the need for this sill thread... case in point tonight.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from jete02fan. Show jete02fan's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    In response to RigatoniT's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    A healthy Sizemore negates the need for this sill thread... case in point tonight.

    [/QUOTE] hey Rito'!!...in any case, a definite W for Size tonight.. 


     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from Hfxsoxnut. Show Hfxsoxnut's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    In response to jete02fan's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slasher9's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to jete02fan's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    [/QUOTE]


    only 8 games in seanny...why dont we start it now?

    we can combine our CF production vs. Ells

    [/QUOTE] jeez..calling in the cavalry already?? Tongue OutWink


    [/QUOTE]

    part of the fun of this thread was to see which player would actually lace them up more and when they do then stats.  i will say that the head-to-head should continue even on nights when GS plays LF as he is tonight or when JE dh's.  thus far it is a one-sided bludgeoning but i expect GS to make a run soon.

    [/QUOTE]hopefully Size will be considerate and wait til Monday :-)

    [/QUOTE]

    Sorry jete, he was very inconsiderate tonight.

     

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from jete02fan. Show jete02fan's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    In response to jete02fan's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slasher9's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to jete02fan's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    [/QUOTE]


    only 8 games in seanny...why dont we start it now?

    we can combine our CF production vs. Ells

    [/QUOTE] jeez..calling in the cavalry already?? Tongue OutWink


    [/QUOTE]

    part of the fun of this thread was to see which player would actually lace them up more and when they do then stats.  i will say that the head-to-head should continue even on nights when GS plays LF as he is tonight or when JE dh's.  thus far it is a one-sided bludgeoning but i expect GS to make a run soon.

    [/QUOTE]hopefully Size will be considerate and wait til Monday :-)


    [/QUOTE] and......i guess not YellTongue Out


     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from Hfxsoxnut. Show Hfxsoxnut's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    Up to the minute OPS

    Sizemore .994

    Ellsbury .834

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from jete02fan. Show jete02fan's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    In response to Hfxsoxnut's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to jete02fan's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to slasher9's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to jete02fan's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    [/QUOTE]


    only 8 games in seanny...why dont we start it now?

    we can combine our CF production vs. Ells

    [/QUOTE] jeez..calling in the cavalry already?? Tongue OutWink


    [/QUOTE]

    part of the fun of this thread was to see which player would actually lace them up more and when they do then stats.  i will say that the head-to-head should continue even on nights when GS plays LF as he is tonight or when JE dh's.  thus far it is a one-sided bludgeoning but i expect GS to make a run soon.

    [/QUOTE]hopefully Size will be considerate and wait til Monday :-)

    [/QUOTE]

    Sorry jete, he was very inconsiderate tonight.

     

    [/QUOTE] LOL..the nerve of him!! :-)

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from slasher9. Show slasher9's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    Game 10

    Grady 0-4 / 1 OA (bonus point because he gunned ells)

    Ells 1-4 / 1 RBI / 1 RS  (winner)

     

    GS 1

    JE 8

    tie 1

     

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from slasher9. Show slasher9's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    Game 11

    Grady 2-4 / 3 RBI / 1 RS (Winner)

    Ells 1-3 / 1BB / 1SB

     

    GS 2

    JE 8

    tie 1

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from slasher9. Show slasher9's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    Game 12

    Grady DNP

    Ells 2-3 / 1 RS / 1 BB / 1SB (winner)

     

    GS 2

    JE 9

    tie 1

     

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from slasher9. Show slasher9's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games

    Game 13

     

    Grady 2-5 (winner)

    Ells 1-4 / -1 point for getting gunned at 3b costing a run

     

    GS 3

    JE 9

    tie 1

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from maxbialystock. Show maxbialystock's posts

    Re: Official Sizemore VS Ellsbury head-to-head thread for 162 games


    Gotta agree that Ellsbury cost the Yankees a run. 

     

Share