In response to Drewski5's comment:
In response to donrd4's comment:
In response to notin's comment:
Actually, Dickey would not be a bad acquisition. The real issue is matching up. If the Mets would take Lavarnway and Kalish/Brentz, that might be as high as Boston can go. It wuld not be surpreising if the Mets asked for Bradley. Sands probably lacks any appeal, too..
Well if Mets ask for Bradley ......Sox reply ..HA HA HA HA HA.... Very funny
I do this in a heartbeat. THere are 30 Jackie Bradleys throughout the minors. DIckey is a reigning cy young, w / 3 straight quality years signed to 5M/yr.
Man do we overrate our prospects in Boston.
No one is a bigger prospect hugger than I.
What a pick-up Dickey would be. Look at the longevity history of any knuckleballer.
The cost would be prohibitive but consider the quality innings Tim Wakefield gave the Sox of course before his last couple of seasons.
Any team looking to fill a hole in the rotation should pay up for Dickey.