Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to SonicsMonksLyresVicars' comment:

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    Debating others when each person is assigned a specific role is something that is done in a college debating course. The students do it to refine skills that might be needed in their careers. In the classroom every is aware that it is a staged excercise.

    In forums, one comes here expecting others to be speaking their sincere opinions. At least I expect that. OK, Spaceman thinks otherwise. He likes contrarians who are contrary 24/7. Same goes for pessimists, skeptics, and doom-and-gloomers. The debating is more important to him than the sincerity. I am different. So be it. I'll continue to question sincerity.

     




    To clarify:   you don't like insincere posters, you don't like contrarians, you don't like fans of other teams, you don't like pessimists, doom-and-gloomers and skeptics.

     

    That pretty much leaves just you.  So why not sit in your dark, damp, dank living room talking to yourself and stop harrassing us?



    Right, just to add, he doesn't like sincere optimists either (of whose ranks I count myself).  

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from SonicsMonksLyresVicars. Show SonicsMonksLyresVicars's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to SpacemanEephus' comment:


    To clarify:   you don't like insincere posters, you don't like contrarians, you don't like fans of other teams, you don't like pessimists, doom-and-gloomers and skeptics.

     

    That pretty much leaves just you.  So why not sit in your dark, damp, dank living room talking to yourself and stop harrassing us?


    Right, just to add, he doesn't like sincere optimists either (of whose ranks I count myself).  




    He does not, and those ranks also include me.  As an aside, it makes me laugh when I'm accused here (the only forum I have ever participated in online) of being a troll, or insincere, or dishonest, etc.  I'm sure I do lots of bad things, but lying to strangers on the internet is not one of them.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to SpacemanEephus's comment:

    In response to SonicsMonksLyresVicars' comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    Debating others when each person is assigned a specific role is something that is done in a college debating course. The students do it to refine skills that might be needed in their careers. In the classroom every is aware that it is a staged excercise.

    In forums, one comes here expecting others to be speaking their sincere opinions. At least I expect that. OK, Spaceman thinks otherwise. He likes contrarians who are contrary 24/7. Same goes for pessimists, skeptics, and doom-and-gloomers. The debating is more important to him than the sincerity. I am different. So be it. I'll continue to question sincerity.

     




    To clarify:   you don't like insincere posters, you don't like contrarians, you don't like fans of other teams, you don't like pessimists, doom-and-gloomers and skeptics.

     

    That pretty much leaves just you.  So why not sit in your dark, damp, dank living room talking to yourself and stop harrassing us?

     



    Right, just to add, he doesn't like sincere optimists either (of whose ranks I count myself).  

     



    Pike is just looking for attention. His act hasn't made a dent in this forum, yet he persists. He insults and attacks, to ensure a response. As long as he gets a reaction, he'll continue. If we would stop responding, including myself, and ignore him, he'd evenutally stop, go away or be forced to talk about baseball.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In response to BosoxJoe5's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In response to pumpsie-green's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In response to moonslav59's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In the fall of 2011 after Georom blamed the entire Sept collapse solely on Beckett and some chicken and beer, I told him that he was being ridiculous and completely illogical. I played his game for a week and realized that I was wasting my time. He continued to play that game / charade with the forum for the next four months and found suckers among the regulars and newbies. He finally admitted that he was merely having fun and wasn't serious. What a waste of time for all of those who took him seriously.

     



    I thought it was fun watching you guys waste your time.

     

     



    I don't have that reaction. In my opinion a poster like Georom or Softlaw whose specialty is to waste the time and effort of others and drive many away from the forum is a nemesis and is not funny or entertaining. Pointing out those types is like weeding a garden.  Of course, some posters prefer to fertilize and water the weeds but I prefer to point them out and hopefully others will stop feeding them. 

     

     



    At least you have a sense of humor, whether you realize it or not. This post is hilarious.

     

     



    LOL, the fertilizer is no doubt from the nitrogen content in the urea that is sprayed onto the garden during the pizzing contests, not to mention the BS.

     

     



    In 2006 Sony would pay people to go to message boards and bully members until they would stop posting negative views about Sony. You are doing the same thing for the Red Sox. 

     

     



    Exposing specific posters who are 99% negative 24/7 is not bullying. It is simply stating that it is statistically improbable that a poster who claims to be a Red Sox fan can act that way 99% of the time. You know the ones that I speak of and you are not one of them. You must be blind to think that it isn't an act that Georom, Softlaw, and others are playing. 

     

    One could take the opposite side of your claim and say that there are bullies here who come here to discourage optimistic posters and drive them away. It looks like that group is much more successful than the other side is. Just a few hours ago, J-Bay chased away a newbie because he quoted a statement by Francona who said that the FO didn't provide leaks to Bob Hohler. How dare a newbie say something like that. Many optimistic fans get bullied here daily by Zac, Babe, and the Mikey gang. Open your eyes.

     




    You mean selenium... your latest screen name pike?? when you were called out, you asked BDC  to delete the thread??

     

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from BosoxJoe5. Show BosoxJoe5's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

    In response to BosoxJoe5's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In response to pumpsie-green's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In response to moonslav59's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In the fall of 2011 after Georom blamed the entire Sept collapse solely on Beckett and some chicken and beer, I told him that he was being ridiculous and completely illogical. I played his game for a week and realized that I was wasting my time. He continued to play that game / charade with the forum for the next four months and found suckers among the regulars and newbies. He finally admitted that he was merely having fun and wasn't serious. What a waste of time for all of those who took him seriously.

     



    I thought it was fun watching you guys waste your time.

     

     



    I don't have that reaction. In my opinion a poster like Georom or Softlaw whose specialty is to waste the time and effort of others and drive many away from the forum is a nemesis and is not funny or entertaining. Pointing out those types is like weeding a garden.  Of course, some posters prefer to fertilize and water the weeds but I prefer to point them out and hopefully others will stop feeding them. 

     

     



    At least you have a sense of humor, whether you realize it or not. This post is hilarious.

     

     



    LOL, the fertilizer is no doubt from the nitrogen content in the urea that is sprayed onto the garden during the pizzing contests, not to mention the BS.

     

     



    In 2006 Sony would pay people to go to message boards and bully members until they would stop posting negative views about Sony. You are doing the same thing for the Red Sox. 

     

     



    Exposing specific posters who are 99% negative 24/7 is not bullying. It is simply stating that it is statistically improbable that a poster who claims to be a Red Sox fan can act that way 99% of the time. You know the ones that I speak of and you are not one of them. You must be blind to think that it isn't an act that Georom, Softlaw, and others are playing. 

     

    One could take the opposite side of your claim and say that there are bullies here who come here to discourage optimistic posters and drive them away. It looks like that group is much more successful than the other side is. Just a few hours ago, J-Bay chased away a newbie because he quoted a statement by Francona who said that the FO didn't provide leaks to Bob Hohler. How dare a newbie say something like that. Many optimistic fans get bullied here daily by Zac, Babe, and the Mikey gang. Open your eyes.



    My eyes are wide open. Your attempts to justify your action are laughable. Admit what you are and move on. People are here because they want to be here. Let them talk amongst themselves. It is called freedom of association. On top of that you are preaching blind faith, your not optimistic air really speak for any of them.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to J-BAY's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In response to BosoxJoe5's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In response to pumpsie-green's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In response to moonslav59's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In the fall of 2011 after Georom blamed the entire Sept collapse solely on Beckett and some chicken and beer, I told him that he was being ridiculous and completely illogical. I played his game for a week and realized that I was wasting my time. He continued to play that game / charade with the forum for the next four months and found suckers among the regulars and newbies. He finally admitted that he was merely having fun and wasn't serious. What a waste of time for all of those who took him seriously.

     



    I thought it was fun watching you guys waste your time.

     

     



    I don't have that reaction. In my opinion a poster like Georom or Softlaw whose specialty is to waste the time and effort of others and drive many away from the forum is a nemesis and is not funny or entertaining. Pointing out those types is like weeding a garden.  Of course, some posters prefer to fertilize and water the weeds but I prefer to point them out and hopefully others will stop feeding them. 

     

     



    At least you have a sense of humor, whether you realize it or not. This post is hilarious.

     

     



    LOL, the fertilizer is no doubt from the nitrogen content in the urea that is sprayed onto the garden during the pizzing contests, not to mention the BS.

     

     



    In 2006 Sony would pay people to go to message boards and bully members until they would stop posting negative views about Sony. You are doing the same thing for the Red Sox. 

     

     



    Exposing specific posters who are 99% negative 24/7 is not bullying. It is simply stating that it is statistically improbable that a poster who claims to be a Red Sox fan can act that way 99% of the time. You know the ones that I speak of and you are not one of them. You must be blind to think that it isn't an act that Georom, Softlaw, and others are playing. 

     

    One could take the opposite side of your claim and say that there are bullies here who come here to discourage optimistic posters and drive them away. It looks like that group is much more successful than the other side is. Just a few hours ago, J-Bay chased away a newbie because he quoted a statement by Francona who said that the FO didn't provide leaks to Bob Hohler. How dare a newbie say something like that. Many optimistic fans get bullied here daily by Zac, Babe, and the Mikey gang. Open your eyes.

     




    Pike weren't you warned about you policing the forum??

     

     




     

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

    In response to J-BAY's comment:

     

    In response to J-BAY's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In response to BosoxJoe5's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In response to pumpsie-green's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In response to moonslav59's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In the fall of 2011 after Georom blamed the entire Sept collapse solely on Beckett and some chicken and beer, I told him that he was being ridiculous and completely illogical. I played his game for a week and realized that I was wasting my time. He continued to play that game / charade with the forum for the next four months and found suckers among the regulars and newbies. He finally admitted that he was merely having fun and wasn't serious. What a waste of time for all of those who took him seriously.

     



    I thought it was fun watching you guys waste your time.

     

     



    I don't have that reaction. In my opinion a poster like Georom or Softlaw whose specialty is to waste the time and effort of others and drive many away from the forum is a nemesis and is not funny or entertaining. Pointing out those types is like weeding a garden.  Of course, some posters prefer to fertilize and water the weeds but I prefer to point them out and hopefully others will stop feeding them. 

     

     



    At least you have a sense of humor, whether you realize it or not. This post is hilarious.

     

     



    LOL, the fertilizer is no doubt from the nitrogen content in the urea that is sprayed onto the garden during the pizzing contests, not to mention the BS.

     

     



    In 2006 Sony would pay people to go to message boards and bully members until they would stop posting negative views about Sony. You are doing the same thing for the Red Sox. 

     

     



    Exposing specific posters who are 99% negative 24/7 is not bullying. It is simply stating that it is statistically improbable that a poster who claims to be a Red Sox fan can act that way 99% of the time. You know the ones that I speak of and you are not one of them. You must be blind to think that it isn't an act that Georom, Softlaw, and others are playing. 

     

    One could take the opposite side of your claim and say that there are bullies here who come here to discourage optimistic posters and drive them away. It looks like that group is much more successful than the other side is. Just a few hours ago, J-Bay chased away a newbie because he quoted a statement by Francona who said that the FO didn't provide leaks to Bob Hohler. How dare a newbie say something like that. Many optimistic fans get bullied here daily by Zac, Babe, and the Mikey gang. Open your eyes.

     




    You mean selenium... your latest screen name pike?? when you were called out, you asked BDC  to delete the thread?? Pike weren't you warned about you policing the forum??

     

     




     

     



    I asked that the thread be deleted long before the new poster named Selenium arrived. Five minutes after the thread was posted yesterday, I was attacked and insulted by Carnie, TrollSpanker, JEF429, Enchilada, and others. My crime was to post a link without commenting on it. How terrible. Is there a BDC rule against that? I looked at the thread in its entirety and decided why should I post threads anymore. I could post a thread on Motherhood, Apple Pie, and Chevrolets and I would get bashed repeatedly on that.  I don't turn my threads into circuses, you witch hunters do. You police the forum, I don't.

     



    CRAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZZZZZY.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

    In response to J-BAY's comment:

     

    In response to J-BAY's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In response to BosoxJoe5's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In response to pumpsie-green's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In response to moonslav59's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In the fall of 2011 after Georom blamed the entire Sept collapse solely on Beckett and some chicken and beer, I told him that he was being ridiculous and completely illogical. I played his game for a week and realized that I was wasting my time. He continued to play that game / charade with the forum for the next four months and found suckers among the regulars and newbies. He finally admitted that he was merely having fun and wasn't serious. What a waste of time for all of those who took him seriously.

     



    I thought it was fun watching you guys waste your time.

     

     



    I don't have that reaction. In my opinion a poster like Georom or Softlaw whose specialty is to waste the time and effort of others and drive many away from the forum is a nemesis and is not funny or entertaining. Pointing out those types is like weeding a garden.  Of course, some posters prefer to fertilize and water the weeds but I prefer to point them out and hopefully others will stop feeding them. 

     

     



    At least you have a sense of humor, whether you realize it or not. This post is hilarious.

     

     



    LOL, the fertilizer is no doubt from the nitrogen content in the urea that is sprayed onto the garden during the pizzing contests, not to mention the BS.

     

     



    In 2006 Sony would pay people to go to message boards and bully members until they would stop posting negative views about Sony. You are doing the same thing for the Red Sox. 

     

     



    Exposing specific posters who are 99% negative 24/7 is not bullying. It is simply stating that it is statistically improbable that a poster who claims to be a Red Sox fan can act that way 99% of the time. You know the ones that I speak of and you are not one of them. You must be blind to think that it isn't an act that Georom, Softlaw, and others are playing. 

     

    One could take the opposite side of your claim and say that there are bullies here who come here to discourage optimistic posters and drive them away. It looks like that group is much more successful than the other side is. Just a few hours ago, J-Bay chased away a newbie because he quoted a statement by Francona who said that the FO didn't provide leaks to Bob Hohler. How dare a newbie say something like that. Many optimistic fans get bullied here daily by Zac, Babe, and the Mikey gang. Open your eyes.

     




    You mean selenium... your latest screen name pike?? when you were called out, you asked BDC  to delete the thread?? Pike weren't you warned about you policing the forum??

     

     




     

     



    I asked that the thread be deleted long before the new poster named Selenium arrived. Five minutes after the thread was posted yesterday, I was attacked and insulted by Carnie, TrollSpanker, JEF429, Enchilada, and others. My crime was to post a link without commenting on it. How terrible. Is there a BDC rule against that? I looked at the thread in its entirety and decided why should I post threads anymore. I could post a thread on Motherhood, Apple Pie, and Chevrolets and I would get bashed repeatedly on that.  I don't turn my threads into circuses, you witch hunters do. You police the forum, I don't.

     



    CRAAAAAZZZZZZZZZZZZZZY.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    J-Bay acts like a doorman here and he tells others that they are policing the forum. LOL. Give me a break. Every new poster has to show proper identification and be approved by the fraternity. Some walk right past Doorman. What gives?

     




     Pike, weren't you warned about your forum policing??

     

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from BosoxJoe5. Show BosoxJoe5's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    J-Bay acts like a doorman here and he tells others that they are policing the forum. LOL. Give me a break. Every new poster has to show proper identification and be approved by the fraternity. Some walk right past Doorman. What gives?

     



    He is not a doorman nor the forum police and not even that active of a poster. You are a cyberbully, who picked out JBAY because he like Yankees fans.

     

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

    You are the one who is policing, not me. Try to keep up.




    you were warned about your policing and asked to stop.... Yes or No??

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from georom4. Show georom4's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

    In the fall of 2011 after Georom blamed the entire Sept collapse solely on Beckett and some chicken and beer, I told him that he was being ridiculous and completely illogical. I played his game for a week and realized that I was wasting my time. He continued to play that game / charade with the forum for the next four months and found suckers among the regulars and newbies. He finally admitted that he was merely having fun and wasn't serious. What a waste of time for all of those who took him seriously.




    You have cracked....I never admitted any such forum hoax...anyone who knows me on this board knows I am totally sincere, and usually insightful. I dont pretend to be positive...but I dont have to rely on any schtick...What I said about Beckett was 100% correct and validated by many people, including Francona....why you choose to assign blame to everyone makes no sense to me or any wise Sox fan - there were plenty of players who tried hard, played hard, and didnt act like frat boys in sept 2011...I have to agree with Spaceman -  a wise poster who I respect but don't always agree with -  if there is anyone on the forum trolling and being an actor, it is you and your twenty five aliases....

     

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to georom4's comment:

     

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In the fall of 2011 after Georom blamed the entire Sept collapse solely on Beckett and some chicken and beer, I told him that he was being ridiculous and completely illogical. I played his game for a week and realized that I was wasting my time. He continued to play that game / charade with the forum for the next four months and found suckers among the regulars and newbies. He finally admitted that he was merely having fun and wasn't serious. What a waste of time for all of those who took him seriously.

     




    ..You have cracked..I never admitted any such forum hoax...anyone who knows me on this board knows I am totally sincere, and usually insightful. I dont pretend to be positive...but I dont have to rely on any schtick...What I said about Beckett was 100% correct and validated by many people, including Francona....why you choose to assign blame to everyone makes no sense to me or any wise Sox fan - there were plenty of players who tried hard, played hard, and didnt act like frat boys in sept 2011...I have to agree with Spaceman -  a wise poster who I respect but don't always agree with -  if there is anyone on the forum trolling and being an actor, it is you and your twenty five aliases....

     

     

     




    or on it....and I don't know about the insigtful part, geo. ;))

     

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from georom4. Show georom4's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    lol JB....you know it - cmon - admit it...

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from notin. Show notin's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    Sox just signed Overbay. Minor league deal...

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to notin's comment:

     

    Sox just signed Overbay. Minor league deal...

     




     Good move

     

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from rkarp. Show rkarp's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    Zzzzzzzzzzz z

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from SonicsMonksLyresVicars. Show SonicsMonksLyresVicars's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

    You are the one who is policing, not me. Try to keep up.




    That's laughable.  You are the number 1 would-be policeman around here.  Which is why you are so widely loathed.  Do you not understand that, or do you not agree that is true?

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from SonicsMonksLyresVicars. Show SonicsMonksLyresVicars's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to notin's comment:

    Sox just signed Overbay. Minor league deal...




    Notin, stop with the baseball nonsense and let us get back to discussing Geo and Pike. 

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from SpacemanEephus. Show SpacemanEephus's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to notin's comment:

    Sox just signed Overbay. Minor league deal...



    Excellent.  Lyle might be toast, but no risk there.  If he still has some gas in the tank, he is nice depth and lord knows a couple more lefty bats wouldn't be bad to have around.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from SonicsMonksLyresVicars. Show SonicsMonksLyresVicars's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

    I have never been warned by anyone over anything here. Have you? I have been banned for no reason several times and had to come back with a new moniker.  Is it a crime to come back with a new moniker when you have been banned without cause? Babe was banned over 200 times for trolling and came back each time with a new moniker and you threw a party and shed a few tears of joy when he arrived. Why is that. Have you seen Zac32 or Zac33 today?




    1) why, in your opinion, have you been banned?; and

    2) why are you are not open about your new monickers, denying they/you are Pike and even referring to "them" in the 3rd person?

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    I have never been warned by anyone over anything here. Have you? I have beenbanned for no reason several times and had to come back with a new moniker.  Is it a crime to come back with a new moniker when you have been banned without cause? Babe was banned over 200 times for trolling and came back each time with a new moniker and you threw a party and shed a few tears of joy when he arrived. Why is that. Have you seen Zac32 or Zac33 today?

     




     I was warned about you, but it didn't do you justice.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from mef429. Show mef429's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    this thread is a good one!!

    exibit A on why to avoid pike.

    Just stop replying to his nonsense until we get the ignore button back. Then the problem will solve itself

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from mef429. Show mef429's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    seems pretty evident to me eh?

    please take the troll act somewhere else. your blather is tiresome pike.

    Since you hate this place so much i doubt you will miss it when you find a more suitable forum..

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from Ice-Cream. Show Ice-Cream's posts

    Re: Red Sox have lack of depth in the infield..

    Overbay had one good year,.............with Toronto,............around 8 years ago.   

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share