Re: Red Sox Should Buget One Year Market Rate To Acquire Beltran (No on 2 guaranteed market rate years)
posted at 11/10/2013 10:57 AM EST
In response to emp9's comment:
In response to redsoxandguitars' comment:
If the market is 2 years, no, but a one year market rate with a 2nd year option/player opt out is obvious for the 2014 Red Sox. I expect that should close the deal and cost little more than what Napoli cost in 2013. Beltran has the two year work record to show he's worth a one year contract risk in hopes of getting another 140 plus games season.
LF would be a perfect place to put him, at home, with a move to RF in ballparks with vast LF and shorter porch RF like Yankee stadium.
With Shane and Bradley, Ellsbury is surely and thankfully gone for 2014, and the 100M plus that some foolishly advocate spending to retain him, should be laughed at in favor of promoting Bradley to CF and improving the slugging in the OF with a one year commitment to Beltran that could end up being a good value and fit for one or a team option 2nd year.
Napoli should not be resigned, and if Kendrys Morales cost more than 3 or 4 years and 40 to 50M, Nava should platoon at 1st base and be OF depth with a cheap one year lower single digits deal on Konerko.
Carp should be traded on what amounts to a one-time lottery windfall highest he'll ever have in trade value.
3B Middlebrooks (His HR rate matters folks, in what has been an injury year)
C Ross & AJ (AJ and one year makes more sense than 3 years of Salty costs, with Swihart, Lavarnway and Vazquex insuring no need to do absurdly stupid things like guarantee 70 million plus to McCann and 30 million plus to hands of stone and arm of paper Salty)
Payroll budget increased by 20 million plus, net 1 to 2 draft picks.
Beltran will be a draft pick charge, but that's offset by the draft picks picked up for Ellsbury and Napoli and let's hope and pray on S. Drew.
Red Sox should try and get a team to take the debt of Peavy off the 2014 books, which would increase the budget more to provide necessary flexibility over this winter and next summer.
Why all the hate for Carp? All he did was bat .290+, 20XBH, 40+RBI, 9Hrs, scored 30+ runs, in just 80+ games, all while getting paid league minimum. ? Oh, and learned a new position out of ST...?
What? You just don't like the guy i take it?
He hates Carp because he did not propose acquiring Carp.
He was anti-Victorino for a long time for the same reason.