Re: Report problems on the Talk to BDC forum
posted at 1/24/2013 9:31 PM EST
In response to LR3683paw's comment:
My last post was directed at Pumpsie for his previous comment. Please try to keep up. Here it is once again.:
In response to pumpsie-green's comment:
Another issue that I think deserves public clarification Dottie: why are so many posts getting deleted while others that are clearly either provocative or personal in nature are allowed to remain?
???? Have you read every post that was deleted by BDC? That must mean that you are here 24/7 and read every single post and documented them before they were later deleted. The only other explanation is that you made a digital copy of every thread every ten minutes and had them in a database that you could refer to after specific posts got deleted. I doubt that. You are making a value judgement on posts that got deleted when you don't have the facts. With a medical degree, one would expect you to be more logical.
Your second point is that many posts that are procative or personal in nature are allowed to remain. What do you consider to be provacative or personal. When the new troll named Triumph ( previosly BenCherringtom / Yazzer) says that you were banned from Talksox.com and Sawxheads, is that fact or provacative? Were you in fact banned there? Why? Is identifying crybabies ( Carnie does it) or whiners ( many now do it now ) or pretenders / liars ( Moonslav does it) considered by you to be provative or personal. Many here are calling Zillagod and DGalehouse a whiner / chronic wet blanket ( Spaceman and Redsoxdirtdog), is that provacative or the truth? You are known from your behavior at Talksox.com that you are the master of juvenile, abusive, nicknames for Sox players. Is exposing that fact a BDC violation?
The forum needs to police itself. It was previously done by a few and is now being done by many more. The pretenders, liars, phonies, enablers, need to be exposed. Nothing wrong with that and it is not a BDC violation.
Pike, of course I am not reading deleted posts. I am simply noting the number of them that ARE being deleted and am wondering what criteria were used in the decision to delete them. That would be helpful to many of us here. It is not me who gets to decide (nor do I WANT to be the one to decide, in contrast to what KST thinks) which posts ought to go. Someone else is deciding that and I think the criteria for banning posters and deleting posts should be a bit more clear. As far as I know no one appointed you BDC Policeman of the Year. In fact, several posters have stated that it bothers them that you think that is your job here-more so than to discuss baseball. Yet you continue to do it. You figure that out.
As for Triumph, he is a classic troll, someone who contributes nothing to the discussions but seeks only (and generally unsuccessfully) to provoke other posters into joining his personal rants. I just ignore him, in general, as that works well for me.
I am not going to comment now or ever on TalkSox other than to say that life goes on. That is history. I am trying to address you in an adult manner and not make this into something personal, and I would appreciate it if you could do the same.