RIP LARRY HAGMAN... can we call a truce on death?

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from EnchiladaT. Show EnchiladaT's posts

    Re: RIP LARRY HAGMAN... can we call a truce on death?

    who wouldn't want to tag Victoria Principal? Larry did.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheExaminer. Show TheExaminer's posts

    Re: RIP LARRY HAGMAN... can we call a truce on death?

    JR really IS dead now! What shall they do on the new Dallas?

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from hill55. Show hill55's posts

    Re: RIP LARRY HAGMAN... can we call a truce on death?

    In response to Softlaw1's comment:

    There was never any hate muslim video that caused the Libyan embaassy attack, and Obama and his administration knew there wasn't. They lied to try and improve their chances of winning the election. Because it involved federal office and national security, impeachment is the proper step to halt a tryant.

    It's not baseball-related, but ...

    http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/01/politics/libya-attack-statements/index.html

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from SonicsMonksLyresVicars. Show SonicsMonksLyresVicars's posts

    Re: RIP LARRY HAGMAN... can we call a truce on death?

    WADRTLH, does anyone care in even the slightest artistic sense? 


    Sure, his public image seemed fun and cool, and he almost certainly got to do Barbara Eden which is worth an infinite amount of quatloos, plus 2.

    But that's about it, right?

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from SonicsMonksLyresVicars. Show SonicsMonksLyresVicars's posts

    Re: RIP LARRY HAGMAN... can we call a truce on death?

    In response to Softlaw1's comment:

    Hill, that link is snipets and propaganda based on the editing. The administration lied and repeated, over and over, to the UN, through the public airwaves, that the attack was a demonstration in response to a Muhammad hate video. In those selective snipets, Clinton refers to religious tolerance in the context of the Muslim hate video. Obama'sRose Garden snipet was not his or the administration's public comment on the reason for the Libyan embaassy attack. Instead, Obama, to the United Nations, would go on to provide exactly the same procliamation as Clinton and Rice, which was that the attack was the result of a demonstration that was provoked by the muslim hate video.

    They were lying to the public in an attempt to retain power. The arrogance of Clinton telling one of the survivors that they would bring to justice the video maker, and Obama's arrogance about moving Rice to Secretary of State should be met with articles of impeachment. The cover-up has expanded to include recent recanting of testimony to Congress.

    Regardless of what CNN or other media outlets are spinning, the evidence is there, in both video and intelligence and testimony to Congress. The South Carolina Congressman needs to follow through with his statement that the Congress will use legal process to force the hand of the administration, which is still engaging in a cover-up that manifested itself in the recent testimony reversal regarding to changes to the original public talking points.




    ....and you still laugh at the mental midgets that think the 6 alleged Apollo Moon landings weren't faked, right?

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share