SOFTLAW, removed by the "BIG O" as Softy calls........

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from EnchiladaT. Show EnchiladaT's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    In response to SonicsMonksLyresVicars' comment:

    To further answer your question, I have never and would never report someone for insulting me directly....I can take it.  Also, if black people, or gay people, or anyone chooses to use such language to address each other, it's up to them.  But not in my house, not in front of my daughters, not in my workplace, etc.   And it's against the rules here and I'm not willing to enable it.  You are.  To each his own.



    I don't enable anything. I barely respond or approve to anything softlaw writes that is not something I agree with. You never see me use words that anymore extreme then "moron" or "dumb-azz"..... I keep it clean otherwise.

    You target Bill pretty heavily ..... 

    Again I glaze right over every post softlaw makes that is in poor judgment or taste. When he is on his game and schooling people on baseball I enjoy his posts immensely. I do not seek him gone.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from EnchiladaT. Show EnchiladaT's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    redsoxdirtdog you couldn't be more wrong about me... and I could care less about trying to change that.  I won't call out softlaw, softlaw1, softlaw2 or whomever because I do not read his posts when he starts off on that stuff. I ignore it. It is a forum, not a shopping mall, playground, or school. Harmless and easy to bypass.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bill-806. Show Bill-806's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

      All set kids !!!!   WOW, can spring training be far behind ????  We are just getting warmed up for that tough eastern division !!!!!    Good news on the Celtic side, the "ALL WORLD AAU POINT GUARD THAT CAN'T SHOOT JUMPERS OR SHOOT 85% FROM THE LINE" is gone for the year !!   They beat Miami and Rondos injury will make Danny go out for a big-guy (give 7' Fab Mello a shot) and let the other guards sort things out !!!

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxdirtdog. Show redsoxdirtdog's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    In response to GreenPartyCelt's comment:

    In response to redsoxdirtdog's comment:

    I don't even need to read it to guess the thesis.  That being, that socialism / or a social democratic agenda does little more than spread the misery, as opposed to a rising capitalist tide raising all boats.

    One of the most telling quotes by Obama was when he recently appeared on Leno, where he said he could no longer help his 7th grade daughter with math.  It rang true, and absolutely frightening.  All his knowledge of the economy is strictly theoretical, and has been shaped by the FAR LEFT professors he studied under.  Any true discernment would have given a reasonable person pause in swallowing this tripe lock stock & barrel, however it seems clear that's exactly what this president did.  This president has outperformed any notion of the once feared Manchurian candidate.  Nothing to do with where he was born, simply based on his brainwashing by the most radical of ultra-Liberal intelligencia.  White liberal guilt keeps those intelligent enough to see the folly such ultra liberal economic philosophies, which have been disproven time & time again.  This is not to say that Capitalism is without major pitfalls, especially in the world of globalization.  We need a big tweak to our capitalist system, but jumping ship to adopt a socialist agenda only guarantees misery for millions, especially those toiling in places like Indonesia!

    Very sad & dangerous where this president is wanting to take us.  I do not impute maliscious motives, simply an economic naivete that is dangerous! 



    I am certainly not talking about a socialist agenda, nor are the vast majority of the progressives I work with, dog....But doing something about a warming planet in peril, and pervasive poverty, starvation and depredation around the globe is another story...And i do urge you to take a minute or two to actually read the article, dog...




    wooops! This is why one should not as-sume to know where you are headed with something without reading. :) LOL

     

    While I could not disagree more, & tend to think the global warming debate misses cyclical & natural climate change, I respect your concerns. Having said that, for the U.S. to acquiese to "necessarily skyrocketing energy prices," (Senator Obama) under the auspices of REALLY affecting change in temperatures world wide, while China & India laugh at us & happily take our jobs, is frankly laughable. Especially in the midst of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression! For this to be at the forfront of the political debate in this country during these PERILOUS economic times is borderline loonacy! Already, we can't compete globally in the economic marketplace, & jobs continue to poor out of this country. Now, with REAL UNEMPLOYMENT well over 10% for the last 4+ years, you guys want to continue beating this drum???? If there were a way to ACTUALLY level the playing field with respect to things like cap & trade, I might listen???? BUT.... One cannot require all countries to play by the same rules.

    A more open minded solution would be finding a way to shift production to the U.S, where we already have some pretty stringent environmental laws with respect to manufacturing.

    In fact, we have that opportunity right now with clean coal, shale oil, & fracking. Drill, dig, & produce domestic energy CLEANER than those in foreign countries! Does this administration fight FOR or AGAINST this? Clearly, against! & so we continue to buy our foreign oil in the middle east, further polluting our planet & continuing war in the middle east.

    Better if we don't see the drilling & war! So much easier to pretend we're adding to a cleaner, cooler EARTH.

    Instead it seems this president want so start off the second term with a Cap & Trade pizzing match to give a nod to progressives, when he could make a real dent in global warming & boost our ailing economy!

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxdirtdog. Show redsoxdirtdog's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    In response to EnchiladaT's comment:

    redsoxdirtdog you couldn't be more wrong about me... and I could care less about trying to change that.  I won't call out softlaw, softlaw1, softlaw2 or whomever because I do not read his posts when he starts off on that stuff. I ignore it. It is a forum, not a shopping mall, playground, or school. Harmless and easy to bypass.




    No worries Enchilada.  You're a decent guy, but you have called Stiffy a great poster.  I just can't overlook his vile rhetoric of all things socio-political.  I do get ignoring what many have to say on here.  I don't read anything from Kimmy & the whiners. 

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from EnchiladaT. Show EnchiladaT's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    When I say great poster it refers to his wit and logic and vast knowledge of baseball....  that is all... I should have stayed out of this thread  ... truth is I get great enjoyment out of softlaws schooling people when it revolves around baseball. He and moon have had some great battles when it doesn't get too far off topic.

     

    Trying to convince people the Earth is warming a smidgeon of a degree every 50 years or that the water level is rising an inch every 100 years is a waste of time.

     

    I simply show people the realty - the world is polluted. There are a bazillion in your face examples of just how polluted it is. Can't deny it.

     

    I look at the Earth like it is a human body. We all know what happens to our bodies if we abuse them don't we?

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxdirtdog. Show redsoxdirtdog's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    In response to EnchiladaT's comment:

    When I say great poster it refers to his wit and logic and vast knowledge of baseball....  that is all... I should have stayed out of this thread  ... truth is I get great enjoyment out of softlaws schooling people when it revolves around baseball. He and moon have had some great battles when it doesn't get too far off topic.

     

    Trying to convince people the Earth is warming a smidgeon of a degree every 50 years or that the water level is rising an inch every 100 years is a waste of time.

     

    I simply show people the realty - the world is polluted. There are a bazillion in your face examples of just how polluted it is. Can't deny it.

     

    I look at the Earth like it is a human body. We all know what happens to our bodies if we abuse them don't we?




    Agreed.  But.... there are ways to combat this & make a discernable difference.  Instead, we debate things like Cap & Trade which would plunge us further into recession, & quarantee the big polluters, China, India, et al will continue doing business as usual.  If you gathered that I was pro-pollution you missed my point.  The U.S. needs to pursue smart economic policies visa vi energy exploration.  We will do it better & cleaner than the  afore mentioned countries.  We don't live in utopia.  We don't live in a bubble.  We must deal with the world as it exists, & affect change where we can.  We will produce energy cleaner than China, India, The entirety of the Middle East, etc.....  That is FOR SURE! 

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from GreenPartyCelt. Show GreenPartyCelt's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    In response to redsoxdirtdog's comment:

    In response to GreenPartyCelt's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxdirtdog's comment:

    I don't even need to read it to guess the thesis.  That being, that socialism / or a social democratic agenda does little more than spread the misery, as opposed to a rising capitalist tide raising all boats.

    One of the most telling quotes by Obama was when he recently appeared on Leno, where he said he could no longer help his 7th grade daughter with math.  It rang true, and absolutely frightening.  All his knowledge of the economy is strictly theoretical, and has been shaped by the FAR LEFT professors he studied under.  Any true discernment would have given a reasonable person pause in swallowing this tripe lock stock & barrel, however it seems clear that's exactly what this president did.  This president has outperformed any notion of the once feared Manchurian candidate.  Nothing to do with where he was born, simply based on his brainwashing by the most radical of ultra-Liberal intelligencia.  White liberal guilt keeps those intelligent enough to see the folly such ultra liberal economic philosophies, which have been disproven time & time again.  This is not to say that Capitalism is without major pitfalls, especially in the world of globalization.  We need a big tweak to our capitalist system, but jumping ship to adopt a socialist agenda only guarantees misery for millions, especially those toiling in places like Indonesia!

    Very sad & dangerous where this president is wanting to take us.  I do not impute maliscious motives, simply an economic naivete that is dangerous! 



    I am certainly not talking about a socialist agenda, nor are the vast majority of the progressives I work with, dog....But doing something about a warming planet in peril, and pervasive poverty, starvation and depredation around the globe is another story...And i do urge you to take a minute or two to actually read the article, dog...

     




     

    wooops! This is why one should not as-sume to know where you are headed with something without reading. :) LOL

     

    While I could not disagree more, & tend to think the global warming debate misses cyclical & natural climate change, I respect your concerns. Having said that, for the U.S. to acquiese to "necessarily skyrocketing energy prices," (Senator Obama) under the auspices of REALLY affecting change in temperatures world wide, while China & India laugh at us & happily take our jobs, is frankly laughable. Especially in the midst of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression! For this to be at the forfront of the political debate in this country during these PERILOUS economic times is borderline loonacy! Already, we can't compete globally in the economic marketplace, & jobs continue to poor out of this country. Now, with REAL UNEMPLOYMENT well over 10% for the last 4+ years, you guys want to continue beating this drum???? If there were a way to ACTUALLY level the playing field with respect to things like cap & trade, I might listen???? BUT.... One cannot require all countries to play by the same rules.

    A more open minded solution would be finding a way to shift production to the U.S, where we already have some pretty stringent environmental laws with respect to manufacturing.

    In fact, we have that opportunity right now with clean coal, shale oil, & fracking. Drill, dig, & produce domestic energy CLEANER than those in foreign countries! Does this administration fight FOR or AGAINST this? Clearly, against! & so we continue to buy our foreign oil in the middle east, further polluting our planet & continuing war in the middle east.

    Better if we don't see the drilling & war! So much easier to pretend we're adding to a cleaner, cooler EARTH.

    Instead it seems this president want so start off the second term with a Cap & Trade pizzing match to give a nod to progressives, when he could make a real dent in global warming & boost our ailing economy!



    Dog, I have said what I wanted to say and that's it for politics for me for now...For the record, I like most of the baseball stuff both you and Enchilada T post here on a regular basis...Who cares if we are on opposite ends of the political spectrum....

    And I do hope you and Burrito sort out your differences.....Spring training is on the way, and we need to conserve energy so we will be able to claw each other's eyes out over a more pressing topic.....

    Baseball, baby!!!

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxdirtdog. Show redsoxdirtdog's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    ABSOLUTELY NO hard feelings on my end!  I like Enchilada.  I don't even blame him or anyone else for ignoring the vile socio-political stuff by Stiffy, as I often try to simply ignore it myself.  Sometimes I just can't let it go, as it makes me sick to have Stiffy represent my party.  Also, having a gay brother, & having done my time in an evengelical church, I can't help tweaking the narrow minded.  I never really get mad, I just love shoving it up some guys arsssses.  Stiffy certainly likes that metaphor :)

    As for the coming thaw, & with it BASEBALL?????   I haven't been this excited for the Sox in years!  I pray for a scrappy team with a lot to prove!  A chip on their shoulders, wanting to show us all what they can do as a team!  Thank God the Bobby V. nightmare is over & we've got a manager I think these guys will rally behind.  Pitching will still be #1 & with Dempster & Ferrell, I like our chances.  Plenty of raw talent, with coaching to keep them on track. 

    It's gonna be a fun year!  I can feel it!!!!   :)

    p.s.  sorry if I come off as a bit too much sometimes!  I generally tend to use hyperbole for effect.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from GreenPartyCelt. Show GreenPartyCelt's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    In response to redsoxdirtdog's comment:

    ABSOLUTELY NO hard feelings on my end!  I like Enchilada.  I don't even blame him or anyone else for ignoring the vile socio-political stuff by Stiffy, as I often try to simply ignore it myself.  Sometimes I just can't let it go, as it makes me sick to have Stiffy represent my party.  Also, having a gay brother, & having done my time in an evengelical church, I can't help tweaking the narrow minded.  I never really get mad, I just love shoving it up some guys arsssses.  Stiffy certainly likes that metaphor :)

    As for the coming thaw, & with it BASEBALL?????   I haven't been this excited for the Sox in years!  I pray for a scrappy team with a lot to prove!  A chip on their shoulders, wanting to show us all what they can do as a team!  Thank God the Bobby V. nightmare is over & we've got a manager I think these guys will rally behind.  Pitching will still be #1 & with Dempster & Ferrell, I like our chances.  Plenty of raw talent, with coaching to keep them on track. 

    It's gonna be a fun year!  I can feel it!!!!   :)

    p.s.  sorry if I come off as a bit too much sometimes!  I generally tend to use hyperbole for effect.



    You don't at all dog...You iz a very reasonable dude.....

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from ampoule. Show ampoule's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    Nuclear energy...I wonder what the anti-windmill people would think of that?  Personally, I like it...nuclear waste and all.

    Is not France run mostly on nuclear?

    I disagree with many people here, but refuse to get into a name-calling contest.

    Softy may be disagreeable to many, but he certainly isn't stupid.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxdirtdog. Show redsoxdirtdog's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    In response to ampoule's comment:

    Nuclear energy...I wonder what the anti-windmill people would think of that?  Personally, I like it...nuclear waste and all.

    Is not France run mostly on nuclear?

    I disagree with many people here, but refuse to get into a name-calling contest.

    Softy may be disagreeable to many, but he certainly isn't stupid.




    Oh yeh you son of a bi...

     

    Ooooops!  Caught myself.

    How's it going in the berg Amp???   Cold & rainy as usual.  We gotta get out of this place, if it's the last thing we ever do....

    Some day I shall shake the berg & head back to my beloved Boston & Cape Cod!   Until then, it's a pretty good place to raise my kids.  GOD I miss being able to kick all things Sox, Bruins, Celtics, Patriots, political around with people who actually know something!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from Hfxsoxnut. Show Hfxsoxnut's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    In response to ampoule's comment:

    Nuclear energy...I wonder what the anti-windmill people would think of that?  Personally, I like it...nuclear waste and all.

    Is not France run mostly on nuclear?

    I disagree with many people here, but refuse to get into a name-calling contest.

    Softy may be disagreeable to many, but he certainly isn't stupid.



    He repeats his statements like a parrot (like the posts he's still making about 'Wastefield' and Moonslav's proposed contract offer to him).  He refuses to debate reasonably with anyone who disagrees with him.  There are different kinds of stupid.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxdirtdog. Show redsoxdirtdog's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    In response to ampoule's comment:

     

    Nuclear energy...I wonder what the anti-windmill people would think of that?  Personally, I like it...nuclear waste and all.

    Is not France run mostly on nuclear?

    I disagree with many people here, but refuse to get into a name-calling contest.

    Softy may be disagreeable to many, but he certainly isn't stupid.

     



    "DISAGREEABLE" HAS TO BE THE EUPHEMISM OF THE CENTURY when discussing the relative merits of the soft one :)  LOL    Come on now Amp, you can't BS a BS artist.  :)

     

    "DISAGREEABLE?"

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from EnchiladaT. Show EnchiladaT's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    I have one or 2 posters here I simply found it impossible to ignore... I have certainly targeted them. I must admit I have that flaw

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheExaminer. Show TheExaminer's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    Softy IS The Big O. Bill hasnt figured it out yet......

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from SonicsMonksLyresVicars. Show SonicsMonksLyresVicars's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    In response to EnchiladaT's comment:

    In response to SonicsMonksLyresVicars' comment:

     

    To further answer your question, I have never and would never report someone for insulting me directly....I can take it.  Also, if black people, or gay people, or anyone chooses to use such language to address each other, it's up to them.  But not in my house, not in front of my daughters, not in my workplace, etc.   And it's against the rules here and I'm not willing to enable it.  You are.  To each his own.

     



    I don't enable anything. I barely respond or approve to anything softlaw writes that is not something I agree with. You never see me use words that anymore extreme then "moron" or "dumb-azz"..... I keep it clean otherwise.

    You target Bill pretty heavily ..... 

    Again I glaze right over every post softlaw makes that is in poor judgment or taste. When he is on his game and schooling people on baseball I enjoy his posts immensely. I do not seek him gone.



    Edmund Burke would disagree with you:  "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThefourBs. Show ThefourBs's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

    In response to redsoxdirtdog's comment:

     

    Rich liberals & conservatives with beautiful places on the beaches of the Cape didn't need the nefarious oil companies to manifulate them.  In fact, most folks who simply love spending time on the cape didn't need much manifulation.  It was a cost benefit analysis for most.  The cost of the eye sore outweighed the benefit.  I do love to tweak the Libs who tout green unless they have to see it "in their back yards" though.  LOL

    If we are going to do green, taking advantage of renewables, it should be done by the government with ZERO cost to the taxpayers, as we already have to subsidize it's high cost.  There should be no competitive motive, as it is already a joke with respec to being a cost efficient alternative.  As most green energy is.  I could go on in depth to explain, but I'd be wasting my time. 

    btw...  clean green?  Electric cars green?  Really?  How do we charge those batteries???

     




     

    The Prius charges its battery sometimes when coasting down hills, steep inclines, mountains.  It uses no fuel when at a stoplight.  Those attributes are indeed green.




    But manufacturing the batteries is not...

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    In response to ThefourBs' comment:

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

     

    In response to redsoxdirtdog's comment:

     

    Rich liberals & conservatives with beautiful places on the beaches of the Cape didn't need the nefarious oil companies to manifulate them.  In fact, most folks who simply love spending time on the cape didn't need much manifulation.  It was a cost benefit analysis for most.  The cost of the eye sore outweighed the benefit.  I do love to tweak the Libs who tout green unless they have to see it "in their back yards" though.  LOL

    If we are going to do green, taking advantage of renewables, it should be done by the government with ZERO cost to the taxpayers, as we already have to subsidize it's high cost.  There should be no competitive motive, as it is already a joke with respec to being a cost efficient alternative.  As most green energy is.  I could go on in depth to explain, but I'd be wasting my time. 

    btw...  clean green?  Electric cars green?  Really?  How do we charge those batteries???

     




     

    The Prius charges its battery sometimes when coasting down hills, steep inclines, mountains.  It uses no fuel when at a stoplight.  Those attributes are indeed green.

     




    But manufacturing the batteries is not...

     



    ...and some electricity is created from coal-fired plants...

    However, electric cars are "greener" than gas guzzlers.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxdirtdog. Show redsoxdirtdog's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    In response to moonslav59's comment:

    In response to ThefourBs' comment:

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

    In response to redsoxdirtdog's comment:

    Rich liberals & conservatives with beautiful places on the beaches of the Cape didn't need the nefarious oil companies to manifulate them.  In fact, most folks who simply love spending time on the cape didn't need much manifulation.  It was a cost benefit analysis for most.  The cost of the eye sore outweighed the benefit.  I do love to tweak the Libs who tout green unless they have to see it "in their back yards" though.  LOL

    If we are going to do green, taking advantage of renewables, it should be done by the government with ZERO cost to the taxpayers, as we already have to subsidize it's high cost.  There should be no competitive motive, as it is already a joke with respec to being a cost efficient alternative.  As most green energy is.  I could go on in depth to explain, but I'd be wasting my time. 

    btw...  clean green?  Electric cars green?  Really?  How do we charge those batteries???

    The Prius charges its battery sometimes when coasting down hills, steep inclines, mountains.  It uses no fuel when at a stoplight.  Those attributes are indeed green.

    But manufacturing the batteries is not...



    ...and some electricity is created from coal-fired plants...

    However, electric cars are "greener" than gas guzzlers.




    BINGO Moon!  Somebody actually got the point, not to mention THEFOURB's.

    Approximately 40% of electricy comes from that horrific, disgusting, black, dirty, evil? coal.

    How "green" is it really?  I'm constantly amazed at the fact that most people equate electric cars with a virtual "zero carbon footprint," to steal a phrase from big Al.

    I don't have a problem with electric cars, just trying to inject a little bit of reality into the discussion.

    So, if we're gonna go electric, I hope the president supports the expanded exploration and mining of coal, as we are the Saudi Arabia of coal in the world.  Why has he villified coal mining in his first term?  I assume we are going to get all that electricity somewhere???  Perhaps all those super ifficient wind mill farms & solar panel farms???  IDTS!

    :)

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from ampoule. Show ampoule's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    In response to redsoxdirtdog's comment:

     

    In response to ampoule's comment:

     

    Nuclear energy...I wonder what the anti-windmill people would think of that?  Personally, I like it...nuclear waste and all.

    Is not France run mostly on nuclear?

    I disagree with many people here, but refuse to get into a name-calling contest.

    Softy may be disagreeable to many, but he certainly isn't stupid.

     




     

    Oh yeh you son of a bi...

     

    Ooooops!  Caught myself.

    How's it going in the berg Amp???   Cold & rainy as usual.  We gotta get out of this place, if it's the last thing we ever do....

    Some day I shall shake the berg & head back to my beloved Boston & Cape Cod!   Until then, it's a pretty good place to raise my kids.  GOD I miss being able to kick all things Sox, Bruins, Celtics, Patriots, political around with people who actually know something!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

     




     

    What??  WE gotta get out of this place?  You live here?????

    OOPS.....my wife just said it may be Beattle lyrics...

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxdirtdog. Show redsoxdirtdog's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

    Well then, are you for wind power and solar power for energy?  If you agree then we don't need to conflict and debate that. It would be great to find SOMETHING that we all agree upon.



    As I said earlier, I have no problem with them, but they should compete on a level playing field in the energy market.  As it is, we subsidize a high percentage as taxpayers, & municipalities are forced to buy x percentage of mind & solar. 

    I really don't even have a big problem with that, but if the president actually wants to see this country's economy take off, a la North Dakota, he should champion ALL DOMESTIC sources of energy.  I simply advocate us having a GROWN UP energy policy, especially in the midst of the greatest RECESSION in U.S. history. 

    Time to elect some grown ups.  The greatest injustice to Americans is allowing millions to slide further into the lower classes of our economy, with no prospect of a decent paying job.  The feceral gov. is not the answer, it's the problem!  Get out of our way.  I hear all this talk of green this & green that, but when you look into just how green these folks your talking to are, you only need to watch them drive off in their big Lexus SUV, Hummer, or ........  Cut the sh  i   t!

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from ampoule. Show ampoule's posts

    Re: SOFTLAW, removed by the

    In response to Hfxsoxnut's comment:

    In response to ampoule's comment:

     

    Nuclear energy...I wonder what the anti-windmill people would think of that?  Personally, I like it...nuclear waste and all.

    Is not France run mostly on nuclear?

    I disagree with many people here, but refuse to get into a name-calling contest.

    Softy may be disagreeable to many, but he certainly isn't stupid.

     



    He repeats his statements like a parrot (like the posts he's still making about 'Wastefield' and Moonslav's proposed contract offer to him).  He refuses to debate reasonably with anyone who disagrees with him.  There are different kinds of stupid.

     




    Good point...the repitition even irritates me.  You're right....time for the flip side.

     

Share