| GP | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | 36 | 135 | 18 | 39 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 18 | 17 | 23 | 2 | 0 | .289 | .368 | .496 | .865 |
Softy this ones for you
-
Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 2:53 PM EDT
Here is the guy who you said would never be an every day player or SS. How's that trade working out for you? -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 3:01 PM EDT
GP 36
Full seasons ever played = Zero
Hands of stone, slow release and weak arm
Physical and mental constitution of a pretzel
I'd say your favorite player fits in well on the loser Astros until the Texas heat put him back in his beddy bye. -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 3:02 PM EDT
And, I'm not "Softy".
Now, Jim, give us a few more rah rah cheerleader threads. -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 3:09 PM EDT
If you are not softy why did you answer.
Would you say the same about Tulo, Andrus or Furcal ? Their numbers are the same as Jed's -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 3:11 PM EDT
I would say that their games played over the last half a decade are more than good ole Jed's.
I answered because any poster who isn't a NYT drone is called "softy". -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 3:18 PM EDT
You are a funny one softy......Yes their numbers are consistent However I still believe despite what many had said for the past 3 yrs I stand on my belief that Jed is a MLB SS and that is because he was an excellent SS through out the minors and for the short periods he played for the RS.
BTW he was the reason that Hanley was being moved to the OF by the RS just before the Bekett/
Hanley trade. -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 3:23 PM EDT
BTW, to be a MLB everyday SS it will require actually playing one or more full-time seaons of at least 140 games or more. Jed's about 30 years old, now, and that Texas heat is on the way. -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 3:59 PM EDT
In Response to Re: Softy this ones for you:I would say that their games played over the last half a decade are more than good ole Jed's. I answered because any poster who isn't a NYT drone is called "softy".
Posted by hankwilliamsjrWhy are you so ashamed to admit your 'real' identity?C'mon -- MAN UP.
-
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 4:19 PM EDT
In Response to Re: Softy this ones for you:And, I'm not "Softy". Now, Jim, give us a few more rah rah cheerleader threads.
Posted by hankwilliamsjr
Of course you're Softy, why are you denying it? -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 4:30 PM EDT
Why is this such a debate anyway?
We all know Lowrie is "talented", that has never been the issue. He hits very well when he's healthy, and it's worth noting that his defense is also at least average, again, when healthy.
Of course, that's the rub with Lowrie...the Sox gave up on him because a breakdown is always coming, sooner or later. It made lots of sense to include him a deal for anything worthwhile, both to acquire assests and to prevent the team from relying on him in any way (and inevitably getting its heart broken).
I wish him the best of luck and health, but trading him was certainly the right decision. -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 4:45 PM EDT
In Response to Re: Softy this ones for you:Why is this such a debate anyway? We all know Lowrie is "talented", that has never been the issue. He hits very well when he's healthy, and it's worth noting that his defense is also at least average, again, when healthy. Of course, that's the rub with Lowrie...the Sox gave up on him because a breakdown is always coming, sooner or later. It made lots of sense to include him a deal for anything worthwhile, both to acquire assests and to prevent the team from relying on him in any way (and inevitably getting its heart broken). I wish him the best of luck and health, but trading him was certainly the right decision.
Posted by redsoxu571
Disagree. Bad Trade as it's turned out.
Most of his injuries were legit and the mono was a huge setback for him. No doubt he wants to be on the field everyday and I'm happy he is getting his chance to shine, finally. -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 4:49 PM EDT
In Response to Re: Softy this ones for you:In Response to Re: Softy this ones for you : Disagree. Bad Trade as it's turned out. Most of his injuries were legit and the mono was a huge setback for him. No doubt he wants to be on the field everyday and I'm happy he is getting his chance to shine, finally.
Posted by harv53I agree about the injuries and mono. It's too soon say if it's a bad trade. Let's see if Melancon comes back and is good. And I'd rather have Aviles at SS because I think Aviles is better.But I'm glad he's doing well. -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 4:52 PM EDT
The other side of the issue is that on another thread hank/softy wants to trade Aviles as well........ -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 5:19 PM EDT
In Response to Re: Softy this ones for you:BTW, to be a MLB everyday SS it will require actually playing one or more full-time seaons of at least 140 games or more. Jed's about 30 years old, now, and that Texas heat is on the way.
Posted by hankwilliamsjr
Let's not upset the soft-headed one too much...he's at an all-time high for # of posts and he's been able to keep the same moniker for almost 6 months without being banned for the 98th time...those are both personal bests for him...keep up the good work softy and thanks for the entertainment...face -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 5:24 PM EDT
Why are you so ashamed to admit your 'real' identity?
The same reason you are so ashamed to admit your "real" identity. -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 5:30 PM EDT
2010 - 2012 wOBA SS1. Tulo .3892. Hanley .3503. Reyes .3504. JLow .3435. Furcal .3406. Drew .3397. Cabrera .3378. Bonaficio .3329 Jeter .33210. Castro .33111. Hardy .33012. Peralta .33013. Aviles .32414. Scutaro .322It made lots of sense to include him a deal for anything worthwhile, both to acquire assests and to prevent the team from relying on him in any way 571571 I almost always agree with your take but I think you are way off on this one, to sell at a low point is almost never a good idea -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 5:42 PM EDT
How many games played are required for Lowrie to be included with other everyday MLB SS? If it's more than about 90 games per season, or part-time for tired players with anxiety disorders in hot climates, I don't think the elite MLB AS SS Jed Lowrie should qualify. But you clearly are enamored with him.
Bill Hall, who I was told was out of baseball, has a current OBP of .545 as a member of the AL East leading Baltimore Orioles. -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 7:04 PM EDT
In Response to Re: Softy this ones for you:How many games played are required for Lowrie to be included with other everyday MLB SS? If it's more than about 90 games per season, or part-time for tired players with anxiety disorders in hot climates, I don't think the elite MLB AS SS Jed Lowrie should qualify. But you clearly are enamored with him. Bill Hall, who I was told was out of baseball, has a current OBP of .545 as a member of the AL East leading Baltimore Orioles.
Posted by hankwilliamsjr
Trying to sneak one by .......He has played 6 games called up on 5/12 and is 2 for 7 with 1 HR and he is only there because the two guys ahead of him on the depth chart are on the DL -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 7:30 PM EDT
In Response to Re: Softy this ones for you:BTW, to be a MLB everyday SS it will require actually playing one or more full-time seaons of at least 140 games or more. Jed's about 30 years old, now, and that Texas heat is on the way.
Posted by hankwilliamsjrLowrie won't be 30 until after the 2014 season begins.-Daf. -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 7:34 PM EDT
In Response to Re: Softy this ones for you:Why are you so ashamed to admit your 'real' identity? The same reason you are so ashamed to admit your "real" identity.
Posted by hankwilliamsjrOkay, so why don't you want to admit to any of your many other "fake" identities? -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 8:13 PM EDT
I'm honest I'm Jim from Florida and have been for the past 5 years and have never been banned. My profile is also public. I come from Lowell. -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/23/2012 9:03 PM EDT
In Response to Re: Softy this ones for you:In Response to Re: Softy this ones for you : Disagree. Bad Trade as it's turned out. Most of his injuries were legit and the mono was a huge setback for him. No doubt he wants to be on the field everyday and I'm happy he is getting his chance to shine, finally.
Posted by harv53
It's a bad trade, unless you forget that it also freed up SS for Mike Aviles, who has been having a surprising season as well.
I suppose we could have bumped Lowrie to 3B or 1B, since we only have a minor logjam at those positions.
Melancon has a whopping 2IP under his belt in Boston. Granted, two remarkably horrific IP, but its still a very small sample size. There is plenty of time befre we know who got the better of this trade... -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/24/2012 3:49 AM EDT
In Response to Re: Softy this ones for you:How many games played are required for Lowrie to be included with other everyday MLB SS? If it's more than about 90 games per season, or part-time for tired players with anxiety disorders in hot climates, I don't think the elite MLB AS SS Jed Lowrie should qualify. But you clearly are enamored with him. Bill Hall, who I was told was out of baseball, has a current OBP of .545 as a member of the AL East leading Baltimore Orioles.
Posted by hankwilliamsjrcareer obp wRC+ opsaviles 316 97 743hall 308 90 744one is hero, one is a bum?Lowrie AB BA OBP SLG OPS2010 171 .287 .381 .526 .9072011 157 . 306 .351 .452 .803 (pre Crawford collision, start of missing games / DL)2012 135 .289 .368 .496 .865~total 463 290 370 480 850Avg SS 251 306 363 669 -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/24/2012 7:59 AM EDT
In response to "Re: Softy this ones for you":In Response to Re: Softy this ones for you : Okay, so why don't you want to admit to any of your many other "fake" identities? Posted by DaffyDanSofty is becoming the new pike. -
Re: Softy this ones for you
posted at 5/24/2012 9:59 AM EDT
In Response to Re: Softy this ones for you:In response to "Re: Softy this ones for you": Softy is becoming the new pike.
Posted by TheExaminerI remember when a couple people around here used to take him seriously.