Sox sign Naps

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from BMav. Show BMav's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    I loved the idea of a healthy Napoli for 3-39. I like the idea of a not so healthy Napoli for 1-5 plus 8 if his hip holds up. A little concerned that Napoli being a tough guy will play through injury. Little concerned about how the hip affects other parts of the lower body listening to ARod and other injured hip people. For example, wonder if Napoli's quad injury last year was really the hip messing with the quad. So would like to find out precisely how the incentives are written.

    With that being stated, I love guys in contract years. And I love Napoli's bat.

    As for Napoli only being on a one year deal, this opens up 1st base for 2014. In free agency, there is Morneau, Morales, and Morse. However, I am really hoping that a month from now, Jose Abreu finds his way to a cab and sneaks himself to a lawyer.

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from 56redsox. Show 56redsox's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

    So where do you think Naps fits in the lineup? Cleanup? 5th?




    Good Q Trip7, Myself Behind Ortiz To Start, If Ortiz Slumps Naps CleanUp...

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from Schumpeters-Ghost. Show Schumpeters-Ghost's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    Napoli is not a good pick up - even for 1 year.

    Hate the signing - I absolutely hate it.

     

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    In response to Triumph-'s comment:

    In response to Schumpeters-Ghost's comment:

     

    Napoli is not a good pick up - even for 1 year.

    Hate the signing - I absolutely hate it.

     

     




     

     

     

    who cares?



    Hmmm

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    In response to 56redsox's comment:

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    So where do you think Naps fits in the lineup? Cleanup? 5th?

     




    Good Q Trip7, Myself Behind Ortiz To Start, If Ortiz Slumps Naps CleanUp...

     




    Thats what myself, and probably most, are thinking. Cleanup or 5th depending on production. My guess is he will start in the cleanup spot.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from SonicsMonksLyresVicars. Show SonicsMonksLyresVicars's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    In response to Schumpeters-Ghost's comment:

    Napoli is not a good pick up - even for 1 year.

    Hate the signing - I absolutely hate it.

     



    You hate everything....if you weren't such a miserable git about everything you would be taken more seriously. 

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from BosoxJoe5. Show BosoxJoe5's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    In response to Softlaw1's comment:

    Other than you not liking Ellsbury why is it an absurb notion to pay two outfielder 23 mill?

    Because one is a 2nd rate CF'er in decline and the other is a 2nd rate CF'er who seldom plays and was embarrassing when he did play the last half of 2012. 23 million for 2 CF'ers is incompetent.

    This is like when you thought Ellsbury should be the fifth OFer behind Cameron and Darnell McDonald?

    No, I though that Ellsbury should be traded. When it was clear the fan favorite prima donna wasn't going to be traded, I wanted Cameron and his 7.5 million a year cost platooning with Drew and Ellsbury. Of course, Ellsbury was more fragile than the old end of his career Cameron was.

    Now, you've been on this board blowing up Ellsbury for years. The guy is a loser, and has been a loser his entire baseball career. No, he was not a starter or a difference maker off the bench in the last weeks of the 2007 season. Since he was named a position player starter on opening day 2008, the Red Sox have been a lower baseball team.

    But, it's time for you to give the specifics on what you are going to do to retain Ellsbury. Tell the readers why you want him retained and how much you will pay to make sure you are the winning bidder for his FA contract.

    Management hangs on to Ellsbury because of pink hat fans. With Shane, which made zero sense, they have their final chance to include Ellsbury in a trade that will make the Red Sox better. If not this winter, they will get next to nothing and/or he'll thankfully become the problem of another team for his final years in his baseball thirties.



    This post is full of revisionist history. You can't deny what he did in the playoffs in 2007. You cant deny that he was one of a few players in September 2011 trying. He almost willed the Sox to win the last game of the season. You have disliked him since he rpelaced Coco Crisp. You made multiple racism comments directed at Ellsbury in the past. You are fraud who changes his tune whenever it works for you. You lack very basic logical

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from MadMc44. Show MadMc44's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    In response to Softlaw1's comment:

    Other than you not liking Ellsbury why is it an absurb notion to pay two outfielder 23 mill?

    Because one is a 2nd rate CF'er in decline and the other is a 2nd rate CF'er who seldom plays and was embarrassing when he did play the last half of 2012. 23 million for 2 CF'ers is incompetent.

    This is like when you thought Ellsbury should be the fifth OFer behind Cameron and Darnell McDonald?

    No, I though that Ellsbury should be traded. When it was clear the fan favorite prima donna wasn't going to be traded, I wanted Cameron and his 7.5 million a year cost platooning with Drew and Ellsbury. Of course, Ellsbury was more fragile than the old end of his career Cameron was.

    Now, you've been on this board blowing up Ellsbury for years. The guy is a loser, and has been a loser his entire baseball career. No, he was not a starter or a difference maker off the bench in the last weeks of the 2007 season. Since he was named a position player starter on opening day 2008, the Red Sox have been a lower baseball team.

    But, it's time for you to give the specifics on what you are going to do to retain Ellsbury. Tell the readers why you want him retained and how much you will pay to make sure you are the winning bidder for his FA contract.

    Management hangs on to Ellsbury because of pink hat fans. With Shane, which made zero sense, they have their final chance to include Ellsbury in a trade that will make the Red Sox better. If not this winter, they will get next to nothing and/or he'll thankfully become the problem of another team for his final years in his baseball thirties.



    Would you be happy with:

    1. Ells traded for two AA prospects( any team)? Would this yes be because money has been saved??

    2. Trade Ells even up for Coco Crisp?

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Drewski5. Show Drewski5's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    In response to BMav's comment:

    I loved the idea of a healthy Napoli for 3-39. I like the idea of a not so healthy Napoli for 1-5 plus 8 if his hip holds up. A little concerned that Napoli being a tough guy will play through injury. Little concerned about how the hip affects other parts of the lower body listening to ARod and other injured hip people. For example, wonder if Napoli's quad injury last year was really the hip messing with the quad. So would like to find out precisely how the incentives are written.

    With that being stated, I love guys in contract years. And I love Napoli's bat.

    As for Napoli only being on a one year deal, this opens up 1st base for 2014. In free agency, there is Morneau, Morales, and Morse. However, I am really hoping that a month from now, Jose Abreu finds his way to a cab and sneaks himself to a lawyer.



    Completely agree.  Great post.  Dont forget about Napoli in the 2014 free agent class.  If he stays healthy and dings 30, we may be talking about a 2 yr contract for him starting in 2014 :)

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from Schumpeters-Ghost. Show Schumpeters-Ghost's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    In response to SonicsMonksLyresVicars's comment:


    You hate everything....if you weren't such a miserable git about everything you would be taken more seriously. 




    Again - just not true.  There have been some good moves in the off season, for example  manager, bullpen. 

    When Napoli is gimping around the clubhouse and batting .215 - all the supporters of the signing are going to say "if he was only healthy, how great he would be!"

    You'll be one of the buffoons saying that.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from BosoxJoe5. Show BosoxJoe5's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    In response to Softlaw1's comment:

    You cant deny that he was one of a few players in September 2011 trying. He almost willed the Sox to win the last game of the season.

    He didn't "almost will" anything except a prima donna baseball team with lazy and aloof player leadership, which included him.

    You have disliked him since he rpelaced Coco Crisp.

    In fact, I stated that Crisp needed to be traded because of contract value.  

    You made multiple racism comments directed at Ellsbury in the past. Y

    No, I never made any statements that said his race was inferior to another race. Since you grew up during the propaganda federal identity politics era, you don't even know what race is or what racism is. Let me give you an example of a racist statement from a mixed race demagogue:

    They get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them

    ou are fraud who changes his tune whenever it works for you. You lack very basic logical

    In fact, you failed to provide the details on how you plan to retain Ellsbury through his FA which starts in several months. You also failed to make your case why he should be retained and not traded.

    It is you who are a fraud under the cover of one tune that is promoted on this site. It's no surprise that you resorted to ad hom and failed to address the baseball questions asked about a baseball player coming to the end of his disappointing Red Sox career that was touted as a HOF career with various comparisons to Ted Williams, Ichiro, Damon et al.

    HGH and the departure of AGon makes Ellsbury's FA  at 30 year old plus value at base 7 and 3 years, but the Red Sox are now saddled with the embarrassing contract to Shane (his value is only in CF). The Red Sox have the far superior value in Bradley, Jr, who will never be as popular as Ellsbury, even though he will be a better defensive CF'er at the OF position where defense is more important than offense. 

    The Red Sox should have traded Ellbury long ago, but they certainly should trade him this winter as currency in a package to net J. Upton with an extension for J. Upton.

     



    You are blind and foolish then. 32 HR, 8 in September, one in the final game. That was much better than anyone on team in each of those 3 catergories. He is not a prima donna. He os quiet and gets along with everyone expect for maybe Youk. You make it seem like he misssed time for a cough. You have said things like he is no Jim Thrope or he would look good in an Indians uniform. You use a quote that is not racist, claiming to be a victim not to seem racist. For the love of God it would take the most convoluted trade in history for your pipe dream. On top of Upton is not that good and has attitude issues. Keep digging your hole deeper.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from BosoxJoe5. Show BosoxJoe5's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    In response to Softlaw1's comment:

    . On top of Upton is not that good and has attitude issues.

    A racist comment, de facto. The reality is that J. Upton is "that good" at age 25. The reality is that Ellsbury is not that good, at age 30. The reality is that the work record shows J. Upton shows up for work and Ellsbury has problems showing up for work. Last season was an embarrassment, after that long time off to make sure "he was 100%".

    Those who work with J. Upton have said he is a hard worker who is a perfectionist. They say he has a great attitude.

    Ellsbury is an aloof prima donna who is one of the remaining veteran clubhouse cancers for a labor force that has been paid nearly a billion dollars and has produced zero playoff wins in nearly a half a decade. Beckett's gone, and Ellsbury will, thankfully, soon be gone.

    Yet to see your plan to reatin Ellsbury, or your justification for paying he and another 2nd rate CF'er 23M for 2013.



    9 Million dollars for Ellsbury is a steal when BJ Upton is making 15 million and Pence is making 13. It is a below value rate. Victorino while having the ability to play CF, is better corner options. For the next couple he has value because he can play multiple OF position can allow the Red Sox to be more creative with the bench. You don't like and he is Native Hawaiian, Stevie Wonder could see this trend.

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    For 5M, if we get 120 games 20HR and 80RBI from Naps, Ill be fine with that.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from BosoxJoe5. Show BosoxJoe5's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    In response to Softlaw1's comment:

    J. Upton is a steal at the same price as Ellsbury. Better, he is a perfect for the long term. Shane is a lousy value as a corner OF'er.  Shane's value isn't good at CF, but that's where it needs to be. I could care less what the feds say he is. I only care that he's old, in decline, as his former employers wanted to get him off the payroll. Stevie Wander can check that box on the federal census, with help. 



    You would make you team worse just to feel better about the Victorino signing? Now that is silly!  He was pending FA on a team going nowhere of course they would move him. So he isn't Native Hawaiian? You should let him and his family know.

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from BosoxJoe5. Show BosoxJoe5's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    In response to Softlaw1's comment:

    The Dodgers aren't going "nowhere". The feds decide what he is, and be sure to let his family know.

    What is silly is thinking Shane and Ellsbury for the same price is better than J. Upton and Shane. Of course, I would never have signed Shane, who is truly a dumpster non-fit and non-value.




    What do you mean the "feds decide"? You are so non-sensical. You really hate indigenous people don't you?

    No you can't campare the two. One you have, one you would have to trade four prospects for. So you trade Ellsbury and get a couple, why? It doesn't make sense to give up players for someone who will give 280/20/80. He is just not that good. You can say Ellsbury had one good season but you can say the same extact thing about Upton. Further more Ellsbury has a higher career batting average(a .019 difference) and has hit over 300 twice as much as Upton. Acquiring him would just be foolish at that price. To make matters even worse for your pipe dream the Sox have enough righties they want to add a lefty off the bench. Trading Ellsbury for a righty would make that worse. So yes apple to apple the money is better spent on a lefty who, if heathly could hit 30 and steal 40. Both of his injuries were caused by other players.

    To call him injury prove, would be the same as saying someone who get hit by lightening twice is a good conductor of electricity. However you make things crazier by claiming he didn't want to show up for work. How foolish is that?

    On top of that he vetoed a trade to Seattle what would be different with Boston?

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from BosoxJoe5. Show BosoxJoe5's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    In response to LR3683paw's comment:

    In response to Kingface12's comment:

     

    That's a GREAT deal for the Sox.  Very much like the Beltre deal a few years ago.  Naps is a good guy as it's been said that he is very good in the clubhouse.  This is a HUGE win for the Sox.  We get a player that can play 1st, give us some Ortiz protection and can play catcher every once in a while.  You gotta figure he will work SUPER hard to get those incentives and raise his value next year.  If he gets injured then it costs us no more than a Gomes......


    Of course....with all of that said I'm sure the negative Sox 'fans' will still find a way to b!^ch about it.  Of course most of them said that they would ONLY accept a one year deal under $10mil....I can't WAIT to hear what they have to say now.....  Let me guess... "if he's such damaged goods that they went from $39 over 3......then they just blew $5mil for nothing...."  Or my favorite "We should have traded for Upton!!!!"

     




     

    Amen. The forum reeks of pretend Sox fans like Schumpeter and Softlaw. Red Sox fans are a minority here.  So many old men regulars are fooled by this. So gullible to the Internet. Out of 250 mil. in the USA, we have 50 trolls who come here to troll and ruin the Red Sox forum. They have won- when you stop to think of it. The forum consists of 100 regulars and only 10 Red Sox fans - very sad.




    Knock it off, Pike.

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from BosoxJoe5. Show BosoxJoe5's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    In response to Softlaw1's comment:

    You really hate indigenous people don't you?

    No, and you don't have a clue what "indegenous" means.




    Apparently you don't have a clue how to spell it.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from BosoxJoe5. Show BosoxJoe5's posts

    Re: Sox sign Naps

    In response to Softlaw1's comment:

     

    J. Upton is under contract for years. The Red Sox do not have a single top flight OF RH hitter. No, it's not platoon Johnny.

    You seem to have a problem understanding that Ellsbury and his draft compensation would be a large part of the trade currency. One is 25 and under contract for year, the other will be 30 and will be gone after this season. Comparing numbers from the NL and AZ to the AL and Fenway is utter nonsense.

    I've never said Ellsbury was "injury prone". I've said he is a pretzel and a prima donna. And he is. Without a doubt, the reason to trade him is that he will report to work because he wants a big FA contract. The Red Sox need to sleep in the CF bed that is 13 million a year on the great Shane.

     




    Large part of trade currency? You have tried to trade him for everyone you could even going so far as emailing Carfardo and cry about how he was not included in the Gonzalez deal.  He is 25 and is going to make 40 million the next 3 years. He is not cheap. He is not an All-Star build your line-up around type of righty. He is a righty JD Drew. To give away Ellsbury and a couple prospects for is a waste. If you wanted to say trade Ellsbury for pitching you have a much better plan. You are telling me that one year of Ellsbury, an extra pick, a couple of prospects, and any 15 million dollar OFer in 2014, 2015 isn't better than Upton. Just remember 280/20/80 is all you are getting.

     

    No one has said Ellsbury is a prima donna. Yet there are article about Upton not getting along with his manager and complaining about being benched after going 4 for 28.

    http://www.azcentral.com/sports/diamondbacks/articles/2012/06/05/20120605arizona-diamondbacks-justin-upton-sits-again.html?nclick_check=1


    Most importantly, if he vetoed a trade to the Mariners, why would not do the same if Boston trade for him?

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share