WELFARE SCHILL files for bankruptcy and has the feds on his case! he owes between 100-500m! should he leave ESPN?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxdirtdog. Show redsoxdirtdog's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout? : The housing crash was a major player in the downward movement in the economy under Bush.  You can blame much of that on Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac. While those agencys were floundering good old Barney said they were healthy and that everything was fine.  If you would like to know more about the situation google it. “Thank you President Bush — your policies are working. “We rely on less foreign oil today because of a drilling boom on state and private property – not federally-controlled land. According to data from the Department of Interior, production on federal lands fell by double digits between 2010 and 2011, with natural gas dropping 11% and oil nearly 14%. George W. Bush (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari) “It was President Bush who ended the moratorium on offshore drilling and expanded federal leasing. At the start of the Obama administration, the entire Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) was open to leasing. The administration’s new plan, however, closes the vast majority of the OCS. So thank you President Bush for helping America to reduce our reliance on foreign oil. If the Obama Administration would get out of the way, we could cut our imports from the Middle East even more.” Obama closed most if not all of the off shore drilling when he took office.  You can thank Obama for the high gas prices, his policies are failing. he http://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/bush-vs-obama-on-gasoline-prices-in-one-very-simple-picture/
    Posted by 67redsox


    While everything you reference is true, you continue to ignore the points I just referenced!

    Obama is Jimmy Carter on steriods!  He is a manifest disaster!!!  Worse than Jimmy Carter as he has escalated & continued indefinitely the insane war in Afghanistan, plus increased the Debt exponentially over Bush's reckless spending.  All while purposely hamstringing our domestic ENERGY sources, thus "necessarily sky-rocketing energy prices (HIS WORDS!)," in the naive attempt to FORCE a failed renewable energy push.

    While Obama is a nightmarish president, you ignore the failures of Bush.  He did originally support lowering the lending regulations for home ownership.  Yes!  He did eventually see the errors of his ways, but it was WAY TOO LATE!

    Again!  Time to sack up ladies, & have a somewhat reasoned debate!


    It is hysterical to watch liberals use Schilling as a foil to skewer Republicans.  The Irony of their giving Obama a pass for exponentially higher government spending on risky & ideologically driven "investments," is priceless.

    Too bad too many are too ignorant to see the irony????   :)
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    Is the fault of the Republicans "the party of no", the obstructionists that not one Democrat has voted for Obama's recent budget?

    Who's fault is it????
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    Is the fault of the Republicans "the party of no", the obstructionists that not one Democrat has voted for Obama's recent budget? Who's fault is it????
    Posted by ThatWasMe


    Do you honestly believe this narrative?  Obama could drop a deuce in a box and call it a budget, and it would get 30 Senate votes.  

    If you honestly wanted to vote on the Obama budget, why would you strip it of 95% of it's content and have Jeff Sessions introduce it as an amendment?  If you don't want to have a vote on the Obama budget, then what's the point - so you can build a media narrative for the easily deceived?  Yes, this is the divisive GOPs fault too.


     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout? : Let me explain the hypocrisy here. The man has been President for 3 1/2 years in which time he hasn't been able to pass a budget with a fillibuster-proof Democrat majority in both houses for the first two years and in the senate for his entire Presidency, yet he and his goons continue to blame his predecessor for the sour economy. Yet he travels around the country proclaiming that domestic energy production is up from the Bush years which is true but because of the permits issued during the Bush Presidency and the drilling currently going on on private lands which do not require his permission. He and his EPA have done all they can do to inhibit, discourage and shutdown drilling for the past 3 1/2 years. But obama knowingly misleads the public with the help of his friends in the liberal media in deceitfully claiming or implying that his adeministration and policies are responsible for the increased production when nothing could be further from the truth.. And I don't ever remember Ronald Reagan running down Jimmy carter or his administration not one time even though when he took office the country was in deep stagflation the prime lending rate at 21.5 percent, try and pay for a house with those rates. Obama is a community organizer with no business experience, never owned or ran a company never had to meet a payroll but listening to him you'd think otherwise, the truth of the matter is he can't get his own budget passed mainly because the man will not lead he will not compromise.
    Posted by ThatWasMe

    You can flip that argument on it's head - a man who inherited the worst economic climate in 70 years has been blamed for the state of the economy since the day he was sworn in.  Now that he's tooting his own horn over something that (I agree with you here) was more attributable to the Bush administration policies, how are those same critics going to contradict him?  I'm sure he would trade credit for domestic oil production for blame for the economy in a heart-beat - and that's really (though simplified) a much closer version of the truth.


     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout? : Do you honestly believe this narrative?  Obama could drop a deuce in a box and call it a budget, and it would get 30 Senate votes.   If you honestly wanted to vote on the Obama budget, why would you strip it of 95% of it's content and have Jeff Sessions introduce it as an amendment?  If you don't want to have a vote on the Obama budget, then what's the point - so you can build a media narrative for the easily deceived?  Yes, this is the divisive GOPs fault too.
    Posted by slomag


    If that is true then answer why the Democrat controlled Senate is afraid to vote on Obama's budget?

    And why 99-0?

    Obama budget defeated 99-0 in Senate


    President Obama's budget suffered a second embarrassing defeat Wednesday, when senators voted 99-0 to reject it.

    Coupled with the House's rejection in March, 414-0, that means Mr. Obama's budget has failed to win a single vote in support this year.

    Republicans forced the vote by offering the president's plan on the Senate floor.

    Democrats disputed that it was actually the president's plan, arguing that the slim amendment didn't actually match Mr. Obama's budget document, which ran thousands of pages. But Republicans said they used all of the president's numbers in the proposal, so it faithfully represented his plan.

    Sen. Jeff Sessions, Alabama Republican, even challenged Democrats to point out any errors in the numbers and he would correct them — a challenge no Democrats took up.

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/may/16/obama-budget-defeated-99-0-senate/



     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout? : You can flip that argument on it's head - a man who inherited the worst economic climate in 70 years has been blamed for the state of the economy since the day he was sworn in.  Now that he's tooting his own horn over something that (I agree with you here) was more attributable to the Bush administration policies, how are those same critics going to contradict him?  I'm sure he would trade credit for domestic oil production for blame for the economy in a heart-beat - and that's really (though simplified) a much closer version of the truth.
    Posted by slomag


    The truth of the matter is Obama is not being contradicted or questioned on an out right lie. I know it's a lie, anyone who follows politics and energy knows that it's a lie that he continues to tell that goes unreported, unchallenged on ABC, NBC, CBS and CNN is no surprise to me.

    All this information is in the public domain. The reporters know it to be a lie.

    Nothing new. Certain media outlets report these stories obviously not the ones you follow.

    As far as the economy he spent 850 billion stimulus dollars which he promised would get the unemployment rate below 8% in 2 years has that happened? Remember shovel ready jobs? How about gas prices?

    This is Obama's economy this is the record he has to run on in November.

    He ran against Bush in 2008 now he has to defend HIS OWN record.
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout? : If that is true then answer why the Democrat controlled Senate is afraid to vote on Obama's budget? And why 99-0? Obama budget defeated 99-0 in Senate President Obama's budget suffered a second embarrassing defeat Wednesday, when senators voted 99-0 to reject it. Coupled with the House's rejection in March, 414-0, that means Mr. Obama's budget has failed to win a single vote in support this year. Republicans forced the vote by offering the president's plan on the Senate floor. Democrats disputed that it was actually the president's plan, arguing that the slim amendment didn't actually match Mr. Obama's budget document, which ran thousands of pages. But Republicans said they used all of the president's numbers in the proposal, so it faithfully represented his plan. Sen. Jeff Sessions, Alabama Republican, even challenged Democrats to point out any errors in the numbers and he would correct them — a challenge no Democrats took up. http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/may/16/obama-budget-defeated-99-0-senate/
    Posted by ThatWasMe

    You answered your own question - put the shoe on the other foot.  If the Bush administration had presented a 2000+ page budget, and Barbara Boxer introduced a 50 page amendment, swearing it was faithful to the Bush budget - how many GOP senators would have voted for it?

    What kills me is you swallow this stuff hook line and sinker and then have some one liner about liberals drinking the kool-aid.  I like Obama, but I can still see past his domestic oil claims.  How can you keep harping on about this budget vote?  Nothing presented or endorsed by Obama will ever get zero votes in the House or Senate.


     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from georom4. Show georom4's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    get it thru your thickskulled drill-baby-drill-heads...no amount of domestic production will keep gas cheap because the supply can not keep up with Indian and Chinese demand for oil....got it?

    fossil fuels are a limited source of energy - i have no problem drilling in my own backyard but it is not going to change supply-demand facts (something conservatives claim they understand well)

    the only way to lower prices it to raise it so much that it is rationed by choice, or make it obsolete as an enery source....

    btw you realize that America produces enough oil for over half our needs but actually exports the oil to china/India for huge profits? How about passing a law that says American oil can only be sold to American markets????

    Of course republicans wont do that - they just want to drill more and let the oil companies do as they please...
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout? : You answered your own question - put the shoe on the other foot.  If the Bush administration had presented a 2000+ page budget, and Barbara Boxer introduced a 50 page amendment, swearing it was faithful to the Bush budget - how many GOP senators would have voted for it? What kills me is you swallow this stuff hook line and sinker and then have some one liner about liberals drinking the kool-aid.  I like Obama, but I can still see past his domestic oil claims.  How can you keep harping on about this budget vote?  Nothing presented or endorsed by Obama will ever get zero votes in the House or Senate.
    Posted by slomag


    Big difference is that the Democrats have control of the Senate, they can bring up for a vote whatever they want.

    Why can't this man present a budget for the American people that will pass the house and senate?

    The answer is because Obama will not compromise.

    George Bush compromised.

    Senate Approves Bush Budget Plan

    The evenly divided Senate voted 65-35 to approve President Bush's budget plan today, but only after it moved to trim his mammoth tax-cut proposal by $400 billion.

    http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=93572&page=1

     




     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout? : The truth of the matter is Obama is not being contradicted or questioned on an out right lie. I know it's a lie, anyone who follows politics and energy knows that it's a lie that he continues to tell that goes unreported, unchallenged on ABC, NBC, CBS and CNN is no surprise to me. All this information is in the public domain. The reporters know it to be a lie. Nothing new. Certain media outlets report these stories obviously not the ones you follow. As far as the economy he spent 850 billion stimulus dollars which he promised would get the unemployment rate below 8% in 2 years has that happened? Remember shovel ready jobs? How about gas prices? This is Obama's economy this is the record he has to run on in November. He ran against Bush in 2008 now he has to defend HIS OWN record.
    Posted by ThatWasMe


    He's not lying - he's just framing the facts to cast him in a better light.  There's nothing really to report on - that's why of all the articles you posted, none were actual news reports.  They were all editorials refuting his claims.

    The truth of the stimulus is that it had an immediate effect on the economy.  Maybe unemployment has lagged behind expectations, but we're at 8.1% three years and change after he took office - in the long run, is that so far from his promise?

    The price of oil has dropped $15/barrel in the past month.  There's a good chance gas prices will not be a factor come November.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout? : Big difference is that the Democrats have control of the Senate, they can bring up for a vote whatever they want. Why can't this man present a budget for the American people that will pass the house and senate? The answer is because Obama will not compromise. George Bush compromised. Senate Approves Bush Budget Plan By Carter M. Yang W A S H I N G T O N, April 6 The evenly divided Senate voted 65-35 to approve President Bush's budget plan today, but only after it moved to trim his mammoth tax-cut proposal by $400 billion. http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=93572&page=1  
    Posted by ThatWasMe

    Thank you for posting that - the analogy would be Senate Republicans agreeing to a budget that included some tax hikes, though not as much as Obama would want on the top 1%.  Can you in your wildest dreams imagine even a single Republican compromising like the Senate Dems did?

    By the way, Bush never included war spending in his budgets - he would call emergency sessions of Congress to approve additional expenditure, as if he didn't know from one year to the next that his wars would still be going on.  He's not really a role model here.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    get it thru your thickskulled drill-baby-drill-heads...no amount of domestic production will keep gas cheap because the supply can not keep up with Indian and Chinese demand for oil....got it? fossil fuels are a limited source of energy - i have no problem drilling in my own backyard but it is not going to change supply-demand facts (something conservatives claim they understand well) the only way to lower prices it to raise it so much that it is rationed by choice, or make it obsolete as an enery source.... btw you realize that America produces enough oil for over half our needs but actually exports the oil to china/India for huge profits? How about passing a law that says American oil can only be sold to American markets???? Of course republicans wont do that - they just want to drill more and let the oil companies do as they please...
    Posted by georom4


    You don't have a clue.

    You think it's all about exports? How about the jobs created by developing domestic energy? How about the refineries that will need to built to refine the gas for public consumption.

    Americans using and spending money on home grown fuel.

    How about converting off of oil onto liquified natural gas?

     The boom going on in Pennsylvania is generating jobs and jobs generate tax dollars for the state. The entire southern tier of NY is booming because of the drilling in Pennsylvania, you can't find a hotel room in Chemung county.

    And these are good jobs averaging 80,000 per year, it's hard work but pays well.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout? : Thank you for posting that - the analogy would be Senate Republicans agreeing to a budget that included some tax hikes, though not as much as Obama would want on the top 1%.  Can you in your wildest dreams imagine even a single Republican compromising like the Senate Dems did? By the way, Bush never included war spending in his budgets - he would call emergency sessions of Congress to approve additional expenditure, as if he didn't know from one year to the next that his wars would still be going on.  He's not really a role model here.
    Posted by slomag


    You still have not answered my questions.

    Why with the Democrat controlled Senate with a Democrat President has Obama not passed a budget in three years.

    Obama's first two years a Democrat majority in the both the house and the senate=no budget

    Why?? How can that be the fault of the Republicans? Obama could have passed anything he wanted he did not need any republican votes.
     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    get it thru your thickskulled drill-baby-drill-heads...no amount of domestic production will keep gas cheap because the supply can not keep up with Indian and Chinese demand for oil....got it? fossil fuels are a limited source of energy - i have no problem drilling in my own backyard but it is not going to change supply-demand facts (something conservatives claim they understand well) the only way to lower prices it to raise it so much that it is rationed by choice, or make it obsolete as an enery source.... btw you realize that America produces enough oil for over half our needs but actually exports the oil to china/India for huge profits? How about passing a law that says American oil can only be sold to American markets???? Of course republicans wont do that - they just want to drill more and let the oil companies do as they please...
    Posted by georom4


    The reason we won WW II is because we were energy independent.

    Japan, Germany and Italy were not.

    Pennsylvania, Texas oil. We were an island unto ourselves.

    We no longer are, we need to be in the middle east to protect our interests.

    We are the richest country in the world as far as domestic energy goes, natural gas, oil and coal. Natural resources in abundance.
     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout? : He's not lying - he's just framing the facts to cast him in a better light.  There's nothing really to report on - that's why of all the articles you posted, none were actual news reports.  They were all editorials refuting his claims. The truth of the stimulus is that it had an immediate effect on the economy.  Maybe unemployment has lagged behind expectations, but we're at 8.1% three years and change after he took office - in the long run, is that so far from his promise? The price of oil has dropped $15/barrel in the past month.  There's a good chance gas prices will not be a factor come November.
    Posted by slomag


    If you believe that unemployment is at 8.1% you're much dumber than I thought.
     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from bald-predictions. Show bald-predictions's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout? : You don't have a clue. You think it's all about exports? How about the jobs created by developing domestic energy? How about the refineries that will need to built to refine the gas for public consumption. Americans using and spending money on home grown fuel. How about converting off of oil onto liquified natural gas?  The boom going on in Pennsylvania is generating jobs and jobs generate tax dollars for the state. The entire southern tier of NY is booming because of the drilling in Pennsylvania, you can't find a hotel room in Chemung county. And these are good jobs averaging 80,000 per year, it's hard work but pays well.
    Posted by ThatWasMe

    This Krauthammer piece sums up the whole situation accurately.  
    http://jewishworldreview.com/c...mmer031512.php3

    Read the piece & people will learn  more about the energy situation than listening to an obama campaign speechrolleyes
     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from georom4. Show georom4's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout? : The reason we won WW II is because we were energy independent. Japan, Germany and Italy were not. Pennsylvania, Texas oil. We were an island unto ourselves. We no longer are, we need to be in the middle east to protect our interests. We are the richest country in the world as far as domestic energy goes, natural gas, oil and coal. Natural resources in abundance.
    Posted by ThatWasMe


     the reason we were attacked in WWII was because of our oil resources...these days China/India dont have to attack us, they simply have to pay our greedy oil executives big bucks and they will gladly send it to our rivals, raise domestic prices, and then cry shortage...
     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from slomag. Show slomag's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout? : If you believe that unemployment is at 8.1% you're much dumber than I thought.
    Posted by ThatWasMe


    Yeah, yeah, you want to use some magic formula that measures the people who have stopped looking, but you didn't want to use that same formula prior to January, 2009.  

    Didn't you say something about personal attacks?

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout? : Yeah, yeah, you want to use some magic formula that measures the people who have stopped looking, but you didn't want to use that same formula prior to January, 2009.   Didn't you say something about personal attacks?
    Posted by slomag


    I'm sorry, but to say that unemployment is below 9% when unemployment insurance, food stamps, welfare and compensation cases are reaching record highs is farcical.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout? : This Krauthammer piece sums up the whole situation accurately.   http://jewishworldreview.com/c...mmer031512.php3 Read the piece & people will learn  more about the energy situation than listening to an obama campaign speech
    Posted by bald-predictions


    Thanks for the column it makes sense to me.


     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout? : Yeah, yeah, you want to use some magic formula that measures the people who have stopped looking, but you didn't want to use that same formula prior to January, 2009.   Didn't you say something about personal attacks?
    Posted by slomag


    I'm waiting for an answer why Obama couldn't pass a budget.

    With the help of a Democrat majority in the Senate and House he rams through Obama-care not needing any votes from republicans.

    But in the same time frame he can't pass a budget because of the obstructionist republicans..
     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    Is Charles Krauthammer's column considered an editiorial?

    Gee he seems to echo a few of the points I made:


    Obama boasts that, on his watch, production is up and imports down. True, but truly deceptive. These increases have occurred in spite of his restrictive policies. They are the result of Clinton- and Bush-era permitting. This has been accompanied by a gold rush of natural gas production resulting from new fracking technology that has nothing at all to do with Obama.
     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from redsoxdirtdog. Show redsoxdirtdog's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    You Libs are so good at debating blind ideologues.....

    How about a response to a moderate point of view????

    NOT ONE OF YOU HAS THE JUICE TO DIRECTLY RESPOND TO THE ABOVE!!!!

    NOT ONE!

    Pathetic!
     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from vtfanofcs. Show vtfanofcs's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    Is Charles Krauthammer's column considered an editiorial? Gee he seems to echo a few of the points I made: Obama boasts that, on his watch, production is up and imports down. True, but truly deceptive. These increases have occurred in spite of his restrictive policies. They are the result of Clinton- and Bush-era permitting. This has been accompanied by a gold rush of natural gas production resulting from new fracking technology that has nothing at all to do with Obama.
    Posted by ThatWasMe

     
      Charles Krauthammer is a Republican stooge.  You just like voting for draft-dodging cowards like Mitt Romney and George W.
     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThatWasMe. Show ThatWasMe's posts

    Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?

    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout?:
    In Response to Re: SCHILLING wants TAXPAYERS beanballed to bankroll more of his sinking firm, should OBAMA give him a bailout? :     Charles Krauthammer is a Republican stooge.  You just like voting for draft-dodging cowards like Mitt Romney and George W.
    Posted by vtfanofcs


    My brief experience reading some of your thought provoking posts here i can understand how  Dr. Krauthammer doesn't measure up.

    He would be shattered if he only knew.

    Howard Dean, Bernie Sanders and now you, VT has so much to be proud of.
     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share