Why is it okay to see Bradley lost at the plate?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from chickenandboose. Show chickenandboose's posts

    Why is it okay to see Bradley lost at the plate?

    But when it comes to Iglesia is a crime for him to be in the lineup??

     

    Hyporcrites.

     

    IGGY FOR HOF.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bill-806. Show Bill-806's posts

    Re: Why is it okay to see Bradley lost at the plate?

    bRADLEY & iggy WILL BE BACK SOOOOON ......   wAIT TILL YA SEE HOW LOST "BIG PAPI" IS !!!!

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from xXR3S1NXx. Show xXR3S1NXx's posts

    Re: Why is it okay to see Bradley lost at the plate?

    In response to Bill-806's comment:

    bRADLEY & iggy WILL BE BACK SOOOOON ......   wAIT TILL YA SEE HOW LOST "BIG PAPI" IS !!!!



    Lol. Billy boy, You always good for one thing and thats a laugh. I hardly doubt one of the most prolific hitters in boston Red Sox history will come back and be "Lost" At the plate. As long as that heel is healthy i expect him to be the Ortiz of old. 

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from Hfxsoxnut. Show Hfxsoxnut's posts

    Re: Why is it okay to see Bradley lost at the plate?

    Who said it was 'okay'?  You mean softlaw?

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from S5. Show S5's posts

    Re: Why is it okay to see Bradley lost at the plate?

     Listen closely.  It's not ok.  That's why he's being sent down.  Got that?

    In the immortal words of Homer Simpson, "Doh".  <slapping self on forehead>

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from BosoxJoe5. Show BosoxJoe5's posts

    Re: Why is it okay to see Bradley lost at the plate?

    In response to chickenandboose's comment:

    But when it comes to Iglesia is a crime for him to be in the lineup??

     

    Hyporcrites.

     

    IGGY FOR HOF.



    Bradley had been option and really hasn't played in a week.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Ice-Cream. Show Ice-Cream's posts

    Re: Why is it okay to see Bradley lost at the plate?

     

    Bradley and Iggy will be back.  I'm sure it was a great experience for both of them.  Besides, both of them are still young.  

     

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from Hfxsoxnut. Show Hfxsoxnut's posts

    Re: Why is it okay to see Bradley lost at the plate?

    In response to softlaw2's comment:

    While Bradley was "overmatched and had holes in his swing", S. Drew just needs more time and there are no worries about any holes in his swing or being overmatched.



    Perhaps because S. Drew has a .264 avg. in over 3000 major league AB's.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: Why is it okay to see Bradley lost at the plate?

    In response to softlaw2's comment:

    While Bradley was "overmatched and had holes in his swing", S. Drew just needs more time and there are no worries about any holes in his swing or being overmatched.

    I have to give Peter Ham a hat tip for providing the total story on what Bradley brought to the team in 11 games played.




    comparing a 23yr old rookie with under 500 AB's of professional minor league ball, with only 229 above the high-A level and never having any above the AA level to a proven MLB player of 7yrs with over 800 MLB games played and almost 3500 PA's...yup, good call.

     

Share