why Not Linares?

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: why Not Linares?

    I guess calling a liar a liar is grounds for removal.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: why Not Linares?

    In response to moonslav59's comment:

     

    I guess calling a liar a liar is grounds for removal.

     



    and unionfallsny and polly, pike.

     

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: why Not Linares?

    In response to J-BAY's comment:

    In response to moonslav59's comment:

     

    I guess calling a liar a liar is grounds for removal.

     



    and unionfallsny and polly, pike.

     



    Pike claimed I started numerous threads bashing Jacoby's defense.

    It's an outright lie. One who lies is called a liar.

    It's that simple.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from carnie. Show carnie's posts

    Re: why Not Linares?

    Looks like he got banned again anyway.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: why Not Linares?

    In response to carnie's comment:

    Looks like he got banned again anyway.



    But, they keep coming back.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: why Not Linares?

    In response to moonslav59's comment:

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    Looks like he got banned again anyway.

     



    But, they keep coming back.

     




    they, being the operative word, moon.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: why Not Linares?

    In response to J-BAY's comment:

    In response to moonslav59's comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    Looks like he got banned again anyway.

     



    But, they keep coming back.

     

     




    they, being the operative word, moon.

     



    There's too many to count these days, but I'm sure Pike has the accurate headcount.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from carnie. Show carnie's posts

    Re: why Not Linares?

    JC went deep again today, off (arguably) top 10 Orioles prospect Clayton Schrader.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: why Not Linares?

    In response to carnie's comment:

    JC went deep again today, off (arguably) top 10 Orioles prospect Clayton Schrader.



    Makes me wonder if he has a 1.000+ OPS in AAA by June, will they give the guy a chance? (If not here, then somewhere else?)

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share