With WEBSTER & RUBBY, Why not a "BLOCKBUSTER"........

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: With WEBSTER & RUBBY, Why not a

    In response to Bill-806's comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    Case in point.

     

    ACEVES, JACOBY, SALTY..... Thats a good start !!!


     

     




    so you wnt to trade away 2 1yr rentals, one was injured almost all of the year and didnt perform well upon his return.The other guy (Salty), people whine about his defense, and a head case reliever?  And what exactly did you expect for a return for this motley crew?

     

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from ThefourBs. Show ThefourBs's posts

    Re: With WEBSTER & RUBBY, Why not a

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

    In response to Bill-806's comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    Case in point.

     

    ACEVES, JACOBY, SALTY..... Thats a good start !!!


     

     




    so you wnt to trade away 2 1yr rentals, one was injured almost all of the year and didnt perform well upon his return, the other people whine about his defense and a head case reliever?  And what exactly did you expect for a return for this motley crew?

     




    Who knew Bill was a "Hope & Change" kind of guy after all?

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from southpaw777. Show southpaw777's posts

    Re: With WEBSTER & RUBBY, Why not a

    In response to ThefourBs' comment:

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to Bill-806's comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    Case in point.

     

    ACEVES, JACOBY, SALTY..... Thats a good start !!!


     

     




    so you wnt to trade away 2 1yr rentals, one was injured almost all of the year and didnt perform well upon his return, the other people whine about his defense and a head case reliever?  And what exactly did you expect for a return for this motley crew?

     

     




    Who knew Bill was a "Hope & Change" kind of guy after all?

     




    Yeah, the return on that trade and what we would give up would definatly change this team and give us no hope at all...

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bill-806. Show Bill-806's posts

    Re: With WEBSTER & RUBBY, Why not a

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

    In response to Bill-806's comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    Case in point.

     

    ACEVES, JACOBY, SALTY..... Thats a good start !!!


     

     




    so you wnt to trade away 2 1yr rentals, one was injured almost all of the year and didnt perform well upon his return.The other guy (Salty), people whine about his defense, and a head case reliever?  And what exactly did you expect for a return for this motley crew?

     

    Oh, you will get something back, more importantly you will be making room for the players on the 40 man roster that are being held back....   IE:   Bradley, Bogarts, Webster, Rubby (don't take your love to town) and others !!!!!

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from ctredsoxfanhugh. Show ctredsoxfanhugh's posts

    Re: With WEBSTER & RUBBY, Why not a

    In response to Bill-806's comment:

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to Bill-806's comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    Case in point.

     

    ACEVES, JACOBY, SALTY..... Thats a good start !!!


     

     




    so you wnt to trade away 2 1yr rentals, one was injured almost all of the year and didnt perform well upon his return.The other guy (Salty), people whine about his defense, and a head case reliever?  And what exactly did you expect for a return for this motley crew?

     

     

    Oh, you will get something back, more importantly you will be making room for the players on the 40 man roster that are being held back....   IE:   Bradley, Bogarts, Webster, Rubby (don't take your love to town) and others !!!!!

     



    Bill these players are being held back for a reason, not just because they are being "blocked" Drew is by no means a "block" and I wouldn't call "doubront" a block either. When these guys have nothing to gain in the minor leagues and are ready to contribute, THEY WILL be there. 

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bill-806. Show Bill-806's posts

    Re: With WEBSTER & RUBBY, Why not a

    In response to ctredsoxfanhugh's comment:

    In response to Bill-806's comment:

     

    In response to southpaw777's comment:

     

    In response to Bill-806's comment:

     

    In response to carnie's comment:

     

    Case in point.

     

    ACEVES, JACOBY, SALTY..... Thats a good start !!!


     

     




    so you wnt to trade away 2 1yr rentals, one was injured almost all of the year and didnt perform well upon his return.The other guy (Salty), people whine about his defense, and a head case reliever?  And what exactly did you expect for a return for this motley crew?

     

     

    Oh, you will get something back, more importantly you will be making room for the players on the 40 man roster that are being held back....   IE:   Bradley, Bogarts, Webster, Rubby (don't take your love to town) and others !!!!!

     

     



    Bill these players are being held back for a reason, not just because they are being "blocked" Drew is by no means a "block" and I wouldn't call "doubront" a block either. When these guys have nothing to gain in the minor leagues and are ready to contribute, THEY WILL be there. 

     

    Thank You,    I also meant to say ......   1/ IGGY @  SS ......  2/Doubront better SHAPE up, or he can become part of the "BLOCKBUSTER" TOO !!!!

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share