World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Getzo. Show Getzo's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

    In response to tvfrank's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to joyceand's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    [QUOTE]

    Well at least Farrell is keeping us all intensely involved in each game. Using your game 6 starter for an inning of relief in game 4. What will he think of next? I'm really beginning to hate him...

    [/QUOTE]

    His use of Lackey was puzzling.  And his use of Breslow was plain wrong.  But we'll take the W, great going Koji!

    [/QUOTE]

    Farrell has a new 1st name---Despite.

    [/QUOTE]

    Or Gomez, please bro.. he did great besides letting Breslow in... great.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from roggdd23. Show roggdd23's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

    In response to Eddymon's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    OK if your Farrell and Victorino can go tomorrow what do you do?    Stay with tonight's line up or go with Shane instead of Gomes?

     

    [/QUOTE]


    I stay with tonight's lineup tonight but I bat Bogaerts 2nd.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from scottwad. Show scottwad's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

    In response to roggdd23's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Eddymon's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    OK if your Farrell and Victorino can go tomorrow what do you do?    Stay with tonight's line up or go with Shane instead of Gomes?

     

    [/QUOTE]


    I stay with tonight's lineup tonight but I bat Bogaerts 2nd.

    [/QUOTE]

    Nice!!!!!!!!!!

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from DirtyWaterLover. Show DirtyWaterLover's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

    In response to roggdd23's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Game ball for Doubront tonight.  He was stellar.  The Lackey move had me scratching my head though.  Does Farrell think that Tazawa is only good for one hitter per game?

    [/QUOTE]

    I figure he wanted Napoli in the game and wanted to put the pitcher in Papis spot in the order - just in case.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from AL34. Show AL34's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

    In response to blingblang's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to AL34's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

    Some good points are that Jon Lackey only threw 17 pitches, not many for Tazawa, and Koji either. Point being they should all be aavailable for tomorrows game with the exception of Lackey.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    I shiver to know Bres and Morales are also available Wink

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Me two, but pray a lot, it helps.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from Dabro. Show Dabro's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

    The MLB Channel announcers are in morning because the Cards lost.  It is bizarre.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from scottwad. Show scottwad's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

    In response to Getzo's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to user_4151996's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Getzo's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to marco0863's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to user_4151996's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Buck and McCarver sound like the world ended.

    [/QUOTE]

    Who cares about that I mean really who gives a fk red ssid ox winners of 2013 world series and your taking about nonsense

    [/QUOTE]

    No waaaayyyyy, it's part of what makes it sweeter IF it happens.

    [/QUOTE]

    I love the chics

    [/QUOTE]

    TFB12 on the Pats board... he's the man with photoshop, and a good buddy.  

    [/QUOTE]

    He needs to set me up!

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from J-BAY. Show J-BAY's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from 67redsox. Show 67redsox's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

    In response to J-BAY's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    [/QUOTE]

    Dirt dog

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from blingblang. Show blingblang's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

    In response to Dabro's comment:

    The MLB Channel announcers are in morning because the Cards lost.  It is bizarre.



    It is a big swing from the euphoria last night to the bum pick off tonight to end the game.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from scottwad. Show scottwad's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

    In response to J-BAY's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    [/QUOTE]

    Great pics dude!!!

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from dgalehouse. Show dgalehouse's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

    In response to user_4151996's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to tvfrank's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to user_4151996's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Buck and McCarver sound like the world ended.

    [/QUOTE]

    Tough couple of weeks for Josephine; he lost his two girlfriends in Detroit, Verlander and Scherzer. McCarver may have to go back to Cialis.

    [/QUOTE]

    maybe he can go visit Dgalehouse and his husband!!!

    [/QUOTE]

     
    What is that supposed to mean? What is your problem ? How old are you ? Do you always act like this ? Time to grow up. Learn how to behave yourself. 

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from moonslav59. Show moonslav59's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

    The last 3 games have ended on a mistake by somebody.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from blingblang. Show blingblang's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

    In response to moonslav59's comment:

    The last 3 games have ended on a mistake by somebody.



    Glad it was not a Sox making that mistake tonight.  Tired of how the previous 2 ended.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from scottwad. Show scottwad's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

    In response to dgalehouse's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to user_4151996's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to tvfrank's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to user_4151996's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Buck and McCarver sound like the world ended.

    [/QUOTE]

    Tough couple of weeks for Josephine; he lost his two girlfriends in Detroit, Verlander and Scherzer. McCarver may have to go back to Cialis.

    [/QUOTE]

    maybe he can go visit Dgalehouse and his husband!!!

    [/QUOTE]

     
    What is that supposed to mean? What is your problem ? How old are you ? Do you always act like this ? Time to grow up. Learn how to behave yourself. 

    [/QUOTE]

    You have been taking shots at me all night long. I have no problem except people who hide behind their remarks. Try to have a gfood time okay. Sorry if I ruffled your feathers I was just flushing you out. Thats all. 

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from kevin13130. Show kevin13130's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

    In response to moonslav59's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    The last 3 games have ended on a mistake by somebody.

    [/QUOTE]

    Breslow, umpires, Kolten Wong. In that order.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from Getzo. Show Getzo's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

    In response to tvfrank's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Getzo's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to tvfrank's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to joyceand's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    [QUOTE]

    Well at least Farrell is keeping us all intensely involved in each game. Using your game 6 starter for an inning of relief in game 4. What will he think of next? I'm really beginning to hate him...

    [/QUOTE]

    His use of Lackey was puzzling.  And his use of Breslow was plain wrong.  But we'll take the W, great going Koji!

    [/QUOTE]

    Farrell has a new 1st name---Despite.

    [/QUOTE]

    Or Gomez, please bro.. he did great besides letting Breslow in... great.

    [/QUOTE]

    And his decision to start Gomes instead of Vic. Oh wait. Nevermind.

    [/QUOTE]

    OK, that was my point so you totally lost me now... whatever.  I think Ferrell is a great Manager.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from dgalehouse. Show dgalehouse's posts

    Re: World Series Game 4 Thread: Red Sox at Cardinals

    In response to user_4151996's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to dgalehouse's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to user_4151996's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to tvfrank's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to user_4151996's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Buck and McCarver sound like the world ended.

    [/QUOTE]

    Tough couple of weeks for Josephine; he lost his two girlfriends in Detroit, Verlander and Scherzer. McCarver may have to go back to Cialis.

    [/QUOTE]

    maybe he can go visit Dgalehouse and his husband!!!

    [/QUOTE]

     
    What is that supposed to mean? What is your problem ? How old are you ? Do you always act like this ? Time to grow up. Learn how to behave yourself. 

    [/QUOTE]

    You have been taking shots at me all night long. I have no problem except people who hide behind their remarks. Try to have a gfood time okay. Sorry if I ruffled your feathers I was just flushing you out. Thats all. 

    [/QUOTE]


    I think you are a little mixed up. I have not been taking any shots at you.  Just making my comments on the game. What exactly are you talking about ?

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share