change?
After faking my way through the tough stuff for well over an hour, I decided to show him that simply agebra is always relevant!
The Sox are definitely NOT team X!!!! & this equation will be the 2013 Red Sox season :)
X + (X + 20) = 162 2013 RS season
posted at 5/15/2013 11:19 PM EDT
change?
After faking my way through the tough stuff for well over an hour, I decided to show him that simply agebra is always relevant!
The Sox are definitely NOT team X!!!! & this equation will be the 2013 Red Sox season :)
Re: X + (X + 20) = 162 2013 RS season
posted at 5/15/2013 11:26 PM EDT
More like
Re: X + (X + 20) = 162 2013 RS season
posted at 5/15/2013 11:31 PM EDT
Woops! 1/2 of that disappeared.
I was helping my son through his Algebra I. Suddenly realized that my 3 years of Calculus 30+ years ago didn't mean squat. I faked my way through simplifying square roots of exponential equations.....
I couldn't remember why algebra mattered until the TRUTH about the Red Sox & Algebra slapped me upside the head.
Algebra matters! The Red Sox will matter in Octobler!
Re: X + (X + 20) = 162 2013 RS season
posted at 5/15/2013 11:51 PM EDT
Now I'd like to see Moonslav set up an inequality to try and prove that Iggy's contribution on defense, in spite of his offense, would be greater than Drew's total contribution.
I = Iggy
D = Drew
o = offense
d = defense
Please be reasonable with your projections.
Anyone game?
Re: X + (X + 20) = 162 2013 RS season
posted at 5/16/2013 9:00 AM EDT
Sooooo.... X = 71?
Re: X + (X + 20) = 162 2013 RS season
posted at 5/16/2013 9:10 AM EDT
In response to notin's comment:
Sooooo.... X = 71?
If Middy & Ells wake up!
Re: X + (X + 20) = 162 2013 RS season
posted at 5/16/2013 10:34 AM EDT
In response to Sheriff-Rojas' comment:
Now I'd like to see Moonslav set up an inequality to try and prove that Iggy's contribution on defense, in spite of his offense, would be greater than Drew's total contribution.
I = Iggy
D = Drew
o = offense
d = defense
Please be reasonable with your projections.
Anyone game?
Re: X + (X + 20) = 162 2013 RS season
posted at 8/19/2013 10:03 PM EDT
My bad! Here was my prediction 91 wins
Re: X + (X + 20) = 162 2013 RS season
posted at 8/19/2013 10:17 PM EDT
.500 gets us the 18 wins needed. Does that win the AL East? I think not!!!
Re: X + (X + 20) = 162 2013 RS season
posted at 8/19/2013 10:30 PM EDT
In response to southpaw777's comment:
In response to Sheriff-Rojas' comment:
Now I'd like to see Moonslav set up an inequality to try and prove that Iggy's contribution on defense, in spite of his offense, would be greater than Drew's total contribution.
I = Iggy
D = Drew
o = offense
d = defense
Please be reasonable with your projections.
Anyone game?
Re: X + (X + 20) = 162 2013 RS season
posted at 8/19/2013 10:37 PM EDT
In response to dgalehouse's comment:
In response to southpaw777's comment:
In response to Sheriff-Rojas' comment:
Now I'd like to see Moonslav set up an inequality to try and prove that Iggy's contribution on defense, in spite of his offense, would be greater than Drew's total contribution.
I = Iggy
D = Drew
o = offense
d = defense
Please be reasonable with your projections.
Anyone game?
Yes, Iggy might make some plays that Drew won't, but I've seen numerous balls hit up the middle or in the hole between 3B and SS that Iggy didn't get to, so he's not getting to EVERYTHING like some will say.
Iggy is great defensively, but my problem is that too many find the need to denigrate another player or overstate Iggy's ability in order to justify their position.
Re: X + (X + 20) = 162 2013 RS season
posted at 8/20/2013 11:03 AM EDT
In response to redsoxdirtdog's comment:
.500 gets us the 18 wins needed. Does that win the AL East? I think not!!!