The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
-
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/10/2009 12:10 PM EST
- LeftyGrove
- Posts: 284
- First: 7/30/2008
- Last: 5/14/2013
Please reply with a yes or no, should the 103 names be released to give the fans some reassurance that the game is honest. -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/11/2009 7:46 AM EST
- jaytf25
- Posts: 2334
- First: 2/10/2009
- Last: 7/1/2012
Yes -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/11/2009 8:09 AM EST
- ZILLAGOD
- Posts: 10395
- First: 5/30/2008
- Last: 5/23/2013
They can release 1,000,003 names , it won't reassure me that the game or anything in this life is honest.
So, I guess my answer is "no". -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/11/2009 8:16 AM EST
- MikeD10299
- Posts: 0
- First: 5/30/2008
- Last: 5/23/2013
yessss. -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/11/2009 8:31 AM EST
- BuzzCal
- Posts: 0
- First: 5/30/2008
- Last: 5/23/2013
-
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/11/2009 11:37 AM EST
- vtfanofcs
- Posts: 717
- First: 11/8/2007
- Last: 5/18/2013
No. -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/11/2009 11:59 AM EST
- OnDeckCircle
- Posts: 751
- First: 12/30/2008
- Last: 3/7/2012
Yes. Any player with nothing to worry about shouldn't care or even comment.
Still haven't heard a peep out of the useless Commissioner. -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/11/2009 12:33 PM EST
- Micksoxx
- Posts: 688
- First: 6/1/2008
- Last: 8/15/2012
Yes, if there are more Yankees on the list so some imbecile Sox fans can hate their way to happiness by reveling in the misfortune of others. No if there are Sox players on it because then some Sox fans would have to fake their indignation and certainly couldn't summon up a proper amount of hate commensurate with that afforded A-Rod. -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/12/2009 5:09 AM EST
- OnDeckCircle
- Posts: 751
- First: 12/30/2008
- Last: 3/7/2012
A possible solution to the ‘roids scandals is to offer amnesty to the 104 players that tested positive back in 2003.For those that still remain in the game, they must submit to a test randomly sometime during every series played during the entire season. All other players must submit to a random test weekly for the duration of their careers during the regular season, postseason and the offseason. The 2nd positive test means lifetime ban, no exclusions. That should tighten things up. -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/12/2009 7:57 AM EST
- pinstripezac28
- Posts: 0
- First: 12/30/2008
- Last: 3/7/2012
NO
it will just confuse people into thinking
they were the only ones at that time
plus that little fact
that these guys were promised
the names wouldn't come out -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/12/2009 8:09 AM EST
- DirtyWaterLover
- Posts: 7637
- First: 6/9/2008
- Last: 4/26/2013
NO. The list is not comprehensive. Just because a player's name is not on the list does not mean he didn't take steroids. It might just mean that he wasn't part of the sample. Also, there is no way to determine if a player was on HGH.
Either publish a comprehensive list with every player that took steroids or forget about it.
People need to get over the steroid thing. A lot of the players took them. We'll never for sure who did and who did not take them. It's unfair to single out one player when there are probably thousands of other players that did it too. -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/12/2009 10:01 AM EST
- markfmnj
- Posts: 0
- First: 6/9/2008
- Last: 4/26/2013
two minds, the NYY fans says yes, to show the rest of the nation that they have their players as well, and then maybe everybody will want something done.
but the BB fan knows that if it is released, then there will NEVER be another deal between MLB and the Union on this -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/12/2009 10:50 AM EST
- Spartanvoice
- Posts: 0
- First: 6/9/2008
- Last: 4/26/2013
YES -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/12/2009 11:32 AM EST
- keepmanny7
- Posts: 2320
- First: 10/18/2005
- Last: 8/8/2011
if arod's name was released, it seems pretty shady not to release the other names as well. -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/12/2009 1:07 PM EST
- JimfromFlorida
- Posts: 5333
- First: 5/30/2008
- Last: 5/23/2013
Can't release them unless they agree because of the confidentiality contract.
ARod's problem is finding who outed him.
However MLB needs anyone who did take HGH, steroids, etc... to man up otherwise every one looks bad.
If they do they also don't get fined or suspended.
If just a couple of guys came forward it just might cause all the others to come forward. -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/13/2009 4:48 AM EST
- abe711
- Posts: 30
- First: 2/13/2009
- Last: 1/13/2013
NO none of them should have been released anyway -
This post has been removed.
-
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/14/2009 9:22 AM EST
- LoveSox13
- Posts: 906
- First: 5/31/2008
- Last: 5/13/2013
YES -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/14/2009 10:59 AM EST
- brarrell
- Posts: 132
- First: 4/3/2007
- Last: 12/7/2011
[Quote]Can't release them unless they agree because of the confidentiality contract.
ARod's problem is finding who outed him.
However MLB needs anyone who did take HGH, steroids, etc... to man up otherwise every one looks bad.
If they do they also don't get fined or suspended.
If just a couple of guys came forward it just might cause all the others to come forward.[/Quote]
I totally agree, Jim. If guys come forward, admit they fell into what, at the time, may have been a common practice, and apologize, we can all move on. Pettite did this, and I don't even hear anything come up about his using. Some brave sols, please get it started. Own up, play ball! -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/14/2009 4:44 PM EST
- javaukti
- Posts: 192
- First: 12/17/2007
- Last: 12/18/2011
It doesn't take much to know what a lot of those names are. Start with those we already know:
Clemens, McGuire, Sosa, Bonds, Giambi, Tejada, Palmeiro
then add names implicated in the Mitchell Report (see: http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3153646
for steroids, not HGH, (not Gagne, Paul Byrd, or Pettit) who were plaing in 2003
Bobby Estalella
Benito Santiago
Gary Sheffield
Brian Roberts
Jack Cust
Jason Grimsley
Greg Zaun
Ryan Franklin
Paul Lo Duca
ToddPratt
Fernando Vina
Kevin Brown
Brendan Donnelly
Paxton Crawford
Rick Ankiel
Troy Glaus
JOse Guillen
Scott Scoenweiss
Steve Woodward
That's about 25. Can you think of others probably on that list?
Minor leaagers were also tested.
PLus, you can assume some of those were "false positives" and were negative when tested again (if they were_ -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/15/2009 7:28 AM EST
- drpjn
- Posts: 576
- First: 10/10/2007
- Last: 3/19/2013
YES !
At the prices we pay for tickets, etc., we have a right to know the names of cheaters. -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/16/2009 5:51 PM EST
- javaukti
- Posts: 192
- First: 12/17/2007
- Last: 12/18/2011
also I-Rod, Ivan Rodriguez is on that list, I bet -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/16/2009 5:54 PM EST
- fenwayjack2
- Posts: 2645
- First: 6/1/2008
- Last: 9/1/2011
YESSSSSS. Let the chips fall where they may. It will remove the stigma from players who are not using. And if Jeter or Posada are on the list, I'll crack a rib laughing. -
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/17/2009 4:57 PM EST
- youngdavid74
- Posts: 0
- First: 6/1/2008
- Last: 9/1/2011
Yes! As much as I dislike A-Rod. There is no way he she be left out on an Island alone. The fact that there was a names remain Anonymous Drug test in professional sports period is ridiculous.
-
The infamous 103 release names yes/no you vote
posted at 2/18/2009 1:00 PM EST
- edsam44
- Posts: 1191
- First: 8/23/2008
- Last: 5/22/2013
as will i if/when varitek and ortiz are exposed