RadioBDC Logo
Sweet Disposition | The Temper Trap Listen Live
< Back to front page Text size +

H2H Review: Adobe Camera RAW (CS4)
vs. Phase One Capture One Pro (v5)

Posted by Angela Nelson, Staff  May 7, 2010 06:00 AM

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

Adobe Camera RAW (CS4) vs. Phase One Capture One Pro (v5)

By Head2Head Reviews

Introduction: The Matchup

Most digital cameras that shoot RAW files also include some form of software to convert the files into more common image formats. Unfortunately, the majority of these programs are basic, ineffective, and slow. We looked at two popular alternatives: Adobe Camera RAW and Phase One Capture One Pro. Adobe Camera RAW is widely utilized, since it powers conversions in Photoshop. Phase One Capture One Pro is less familiar to snapshooters, though it holds a steady following among photo professionals and enthusiasts.

The RAW file is often described as the "digital negative" or the basic digital information that has to be processed to become a photograph. Much like the different chemicals and washes in the darkroom and their organization, the interface and processing quality of RAW processing programs are important to photographers who want to reprocess the information.

In this review, we compare Adobe Camera RAW from CS4 with Phase One Capture One Pro's version 5. The latter program retails for $400 for the complete package, while Adobe Camera RAW comes bundled with Bridge and Photoshop for $700 or with Lightroom for $300.


The two programs offer similar features, but in different interfaces. Adobe's Bridge and Photoshop work together; RAW images are sorted and selected in Bridge and then opened in Adobe Camera RAW. Once in Camera RAW, all of the editing features are available. Phase One keeps the Capture One workflow simple - in one program - and allows users to work with tabs that progress from left to right, beginning with organizing a folder and capture structure to processing, output settings, and batch processing.

ACR interfaceAdobe Camera RAW interface

Adobe Lightroom interface
Adobe Lightroom interface

C1Pro interfaceC1Pro interface

Of the programs, the Bridge/Photoshop/RAW application is the least modifiable. Lightroom/RAW is more easily customizable, and Capture One Pro even more so. Phase One's Capture One Pro allows you to simply drag tools to the Quick Tab for sorting and organizing. Capture One Pro also has something that the others don't: an integrated camera tethering function with camera-specific information and controls.

Processing Quality

We used three proprietary RAW formats with Adobe Camera RAW and Phase One Capture One Pro to evaluate the conversions: Canon (.CR2), Nikon (.NEF), and Olympus (.ORF). We wanted to see how the software dealt with different product lines and to check for consistency in processing trends like color, noise, and sharpness. We used Canon's EOS 5D Mark II and EOS 1Ds Mark III, Nikon's D3X and D300s, and Olympus's PEN E-P1, E-P2, and E-620 to gather our test files.

Color: Adobe Camera RAW proved to be more accurate in its color rendering than Capture One Pro for all three digital camera makers. The most interesting finding in this area, however, was that both programs yielded a similarly generic, less precise rendering of color from the Olympus files.

Noise: Again, Adobe's Camera RAW program performed better in handling noise issues. Files were visibly cleaner with neutral conversions from Adobe Camera RAW than Capture One Pro, across all three platforms.

Adobe Camera RAW vs. C1Pro Sharpening & Noise Adjustments interface.jpg

Resolution and sharpening
: Phase One applies more aggressive sharpening to its files, while Adobe opts for a fairly low amount of sharpening, choosing to leave that task for output sharpening in Photoshop rather than Camera RAW. The task is easier, of course, to perform within one program - Capture One Pro - but only if ultra-sharp is what you want


Reviewing Adobe Camera RAW and Phase One Capture One Pro head-to-head makes for a tricky conclusion. Is one really better than the other? RAW processing is largely a matter of preference. Adobe supports more cameras, in and out of the mainstream, and produces a more consistent result across multiple camera platforms. If you're processing files from different camera brands/models, Adobe Camera RAW is your solution. If you have a mainstream camera and like the sharp look of Phase One's files, then Capture One Pro will meet your needs and do so with a more streamlined interface that is easier to use.

For more details, read the full review on Head2Head Reviews.

  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.


Welcome to your community for New England's amateur photographers. Take pictures ... get published ... win money ... have a blast!
The Color Green
It's the color of hope, envy, regeneration, relaxation, and money -- as well as the theme of the October contest. Make it the focal point of your best photograph.
Upcoming events

Featured Photographer

Featured Photographer: Ben Rifkin
Life and wildlife in Madagascar
For years before I started college, I knew I wanted to spend a semester studying abroad, but I wasn't sure where. By my junior year at Brandeis, I made up my mind to travel somewhere off the beaten path, and, of course, Madagascar is pretty far off the beaten path for someone like me....
An essay about Rebirth Workshops
Now that it's been several months since I returned from a week-long Rebirth Workshop in Mississippi, I'm happy to look back and provide an overview of what we did that made it such an intense experience for me as a photographer....
Photography apps for your phone
Thinking of ditching your separate camera and moving to just using your phone for all your photos? What apps should you go for? Instagram made headlines recently after being bought by Facebook for $1 billion. What does it include, and what else is out there?...