TrueChamp's Page

TrueChamp

This member hasn't added any personal information yet.


Leave TrueChamp a message to find out more.

All Recent Activity

  • Posted 09/02/2015 02:18:51 EDT

    I thought the world already ended??? Are we still here? 

    Damn.

        







    "Defense Wins Championships"

  • Forum Post: Why Jay Feely?

    Posted 09/02/2015 01:11:05 EDT

    In response to zbellino's comment: [QUOTE] In response to croc's comment: It's all over the legal analyst twitter connection, all slapping each other in the back. Well done Z!! Michael McCann ‏@McCa more »

  • Forum Post: Why Jay Feely?

    Posted 09/02/2015 01:08:59 EDT

    In response to ewhite1065's comment: Bringing Feely in was The Coup de Grâce, The Clincher, The Knockout Punch and The Straw that Broke the Camels Back all rolled into one. I'm getting prepared for Be more »

  • Posted 09/02/2015 12:57:29 EDT

    Kind of a harsh example as not many D linemen are chasing Rodgers down. I do agree though Vince was a lil slower but imo greatly exceeded expectations considering his injury. Stout against the run and more »

  • Forum Post: PHIL TAYLOR

    Posted 09/02/2015 12:48:46 EDT

    In response to NOISE's comment: [QUOTE] In response to TrueChamp's comment: I personally do not think we need him. Siliga, Branch and Brown give us everything Taylor was good at. We have 3 anchors in more »

  • Posted 09/02/2015 12:43:24 EDT

    In response to prolate0spheroid's comment: [QUOTE]   One of the things that drove me nuts last year was when the edge defender dropped into coverage and the QB rolled out, the interior defender (Wilfo more »

  • Posted 09/02/2015 12:00:06 EDT

    That made my morning! Thanks Breer! (J/k bud)

        







    "Defense Wins Championships"
    more »

  • Posted 09/02/2015 11:52:52 EDT

    ^ Easley turned in back to back positive grades the last 2 games and was credited with 5 QB pressures last game. A sack, a qb hit and 3 pressures in a half. 

        







    "Defense Wins Championships"
    more »

  • Posted 09/01/2015 05:53:54 EDT

    In response to bredbru's comment: In response to zbellino's comment: In response to TrueChamp's comment: Worst on paper?? What does that even mean man? About as much as "best on paper" TC. That is to more »

  • Forum Post: PHIL TAYLOR

    Posted 09/01/2015 05:41:43 EDT

    I personally do not think we need him. Siliga, Branch and Brown give us everything Taylor was good at. We have 3 anchors in the middle of the D-line and 5-7 solid to great guys behind and around them. more »

  • Posted 09/01/2015 01:41:49 EDT

    JlIn response to IrishMob7's comment: In response to PatsEng's comment: In response to IrishMob7's comment: In response to PatsEng's comment: In response to prolate0spheroid's comment: Gotta remember more »

  • Posted 09/01/2015 01:34:18 EDT

    WE CANNOT BE EXCITED ABOUT THIS GUY.......or else!

        







    "Defense Wins Championships"
    more »

  • Posted 09/01/2015 01:32:03 EDT

    In response to carawaydj's comment: [QUOTE] In response to PatsEng's comment: In response to carawaydj's comment: I think our front 7 has the potential to be one of the best we have seen here under BB more »

  • Posted 08/31/2015 06:33:21 EDT

    In response to PatsEng's comment: Be careful dapats. If it's who I think it is that said then expect a snide and sarcastic comment about not being able to win now and that you are a BB hater. Most lik more »

  • Posted 08/31/2015 05:27:01 EDT

    In response to bredbru's comment: In response to zbellino's comment: In response to IrishMob7's comment: Who are all these all-star CBs that are available for trade that you keep referring to? BB load more »

  • Posted 08/31/2015 05:21:35 EDT

    Read up on Siliga...   But literally the biggest shoes to fill are those of departed nose tackle Vince Wilfork, the steadying force of the defensive interior for the last decade. Some might look to co more »

  • Posted 08/31/2015 05:10:25 EDT

    I think we need to temper our expectations of ever winning a game. I mean, we lost Revis, Browner (who led the league in penalties despite playing only 9 games), and an older version of our beloved Vi more »

  • Posted 08/31/2015 11:02:48 EDT

    We had a pretty dominant secondary in 07, shoot the best safety in Pats history was on the play with Tyree, we didn't win that year. Regardless to pin 2 Superbowl losses solely on our secondary when w more »

  • Posted 08/31/2015 10:55:56 EDT

    In response to Getzo's comment: In response to TrueChamp's comment: In response to Getzo's comment: Correct me if I am wrong.. didn't Bill say: I WON'T be like Marv Levy and coaching when I’m in my more »

  • Posted 08/31/2015 10:26:16 EDT

    In response to Getzo's comment: Correct me if I am wrong.. didn't Bill say: I WON'T be like Marv Levy and coaching when I’m in my seventies. You don’t have to worry about that.” I swear he's sai more »

  • Posted 08/31/2015 10:18:57 EDT

    Can't imagine us going with 4 CB's. I think Robert McClain makes the team and we cut T Wilson or Ebner. WHy 6 safeties? No problem with Cadet being cut, have we even seen him play?  But I do not like more »

  • Posted 08/31/2015 10:06:11 EDT

    We'll never win another Superbowl with Bill Belichick running things.

        







    "Defense Wins Championships"
    more »

  • Forum Post: Front 7 looks...

    Posted 08/29/2015 11:40:25 EDT

    In response to mthurl's comment: In response to Angel-of-Light's comment: In response to mthurl's comment: Good to hear, missed the game, but I liked what I saw from Easley the last pre season game. M more »

  • Forum Post: Front 7 looks...

    Posted 08/29/2015 01:01:50 EDT

    Mean and NASTY. Did anybody watch this game? I only saw the normal doom and gloomers on the game thread. Suicide watch etc... From Mayo knifing the gap the 1st few plays of the game, to Collins living more »

  • Posted 08/28/2015 10:32:19 EDT

    In response to carawaydj's comment: In response to PatsEng's comment: Just toss him on the pile of 2nd and 3rd rounders that haven't worked out and move on. Nothing new by far and away the 2nd and 3rd more »

Sections
Shortcuts