prolate0spheroid's Page

prolate0spheroid

MALE, Ontario

All Recent Activity

  • Posted 12/22/2014 01:42:12 EST

    In response to JoeFridaysFacts' comment: In response to prolate0spheroid's comment: [QUOTE] In response to JoeFridaysFacts' comment: [QUOTE]   Once again how can you call 20 passes to 4 runs running t more »

  • Posted 12/22/2014 01:36:56 EST

    Preferably computer, but iPad when a computer is not accessible (on the train, traveling, etc.)

    more »

  • Posted 12/22/2014 01:28:31 EST

    In response to JoeFridaysFacts' comment:   Once again how can you call 20 passes to 4 runs running the ball??? Until you can explain this twisted logic I have no real response..It seems like some simp more »

  • Posted 12/22/2014 12:49:00 EST

    In response to JoeFridaysFacts' comment: In response to prolate0spheroid's comment: [QUOTE] In response to JoeFridaysFacts' comment: [QUOTE] In response to TripleOG's comment: [QUOTE] Umm, thx for the more »

  • Posted 12/22/2014 12:46:22 EST

    In response to JoeFridaysFacts' comment: In response to DoNotSleepOnThePats' comment: [QUOTE] In response to PhatVirginian's comment: [QUOTE] In response to DoNotSleepOnThePats' comment: [QUOTE] It st more »

  • Posted 12/22/2014 12:44:14 EST

    In response to JoeFridaysFacts' comment:       I love how everyone points to the blocking when its the same guys who ran off 7 straight great games when the run to pass ration was closer to 54/46   Bu more »

  • Posted 12/22/2014 12:41:21 EST

    In response to JoeFridaysFacts' comment: In response to TripleOG's comment: [QUOTE] Umm, thx for the contributions??   One blaming Brady and the other blaming playcalling??   I guess you guys dont kno more »

  • Posted 12/22/2014 12:30:59 EST

    In response to JoeFridaysFacts' comment: In response to pcmIV's comment: [QUOTE] In response to agcsbill's comment: [QUOTE] PCM, understand....  even the game comments did not seem happy with how ofte more »

  • Posted 12/22/2014 10:42:56 EST

    Welcome Joe.  I don't think you're Rusty.  And there are a lot of posters on this site (Coolade, Sam, Crazy World of Troy Brown, etc., in addition to Rusty) who agree with you.  As for me, though, I t more »

  • Posted 12/22/2014 10:37:26 EST

    In response to JoeFridaysFacts' comment: In response to prolate0spheroid's comment: [QUOTE] In response to JoeFridaysFacts' comment: [QUOTE] In response to rkarp's comment: [QUOTE] If this is so clear more »

  • Posted 12/22/2014 10:28:10 EST

    In response to JoeFridaysFacts' comment: In response to rkarp's comment: [QUOTE] If this is so clear to you, why doesnt the HC step in and make changes? So are you saying you like the direction this o more »

  • Posted 12/22/2014 08:10:55 EST

    In response to sam0377's comment:

    Trade Josh for + 3rd Rd pick for Harbaugh as next HC in waiting after BB year later?



    Yeah, because we're all jealous of the 49ers' 7-8 record. 

    more »

  • Posted 12/22/2014 07:58:51 EST

    I tend to agree with the article, but maybe not completely.  Vereen is a different sort of back than the others so the Pats tend to use him more in spread formations while the others are better in tig more »

  • Posted 12/21/2014 09:46:23 EST

    In response to agcsbill's comment: I have to agree with Rusty....  a LEAD back and subbing of RBs is the way to get the O-line to improve both their run and pass blocking. O-line is nothing without th more »

  • Posted 12/21/2014 09:20:09 EST

    What do you mean, "if the Pats don't make it to the Super Bowl"?!?!?!

    more »

  • Forum Post: Deep Breath

    Posted 12/21/2014 08:56:23 EST

    We frequently struggle against the Jets.  I expected this one to be tough.  I don't think it's time to panic.  

    O-line, though, is a concern, because the poor play isn't limited to one game.  

    more »

  • Forum Post: Gronk

    Posted 12/21/2014 08:15:59 EST

    In response to NoMorePensionLooting's comment: Ain't right, something seems wrong. I said it a few weeks ago and thought it again today. He is moving "stiff" and not fluid. Now I know he was never fle more »

  • Forum Post: knee jerk reaction

    Posted 12/21/2014 07:50:47 EST

    In response to Muzwell's comment: Agree on Wright, gotta be a coaching decision but I'd like to see more of him. Thought Stork looked fine, but nobody on the OL was particularly solid. The line wasn't more »

  • Posted 12/21/2014 07:47:33 EST

    It was particularly bad without Edelman in there to get open fast.  Amendola did okay, but he's not Edelman.  When asked about Amendola, Brady said he did well then immediately said he hoped Jules wou more »

  • Posted 12/21/2014 07:44:05 EST

    Do you think they're coaching that?  I can't imagine BB liking laterals, he's so conservative when it comes to protecting the ball.  But who knows.  

    more »

  • Posted 12/21/2014 07:37:14 EST

    In response to PatsLifer's comment: They seemed fine for a stretch. What happened?  I know solder and Kline looked bad today, but I think we have to rely on and pray that solder, connolly, stork, wend more »

  • Posted 12/21/2014 06:58:56 EST

    In response to ToneKing's comment: In response to prolate0spheroid's comment: [QUOTE] Gotta be a little concerned about the D's inability to get off the field.  That's becoming a rather consistent pro more »

  • Posted 12/21/2014 06:47:12 EST

    He was competent as a receiver, but honestly I think we missed Edelman a bit out there.  When asked about Amendola, Belichick said he played well and immediately brought up LaFell.  I think that's tel more »

  • Posted 12/21/2014 06:43:12 EST

    Want to re-watch to see how they were using Chung. Recently, they've been using him more as a LB, with an extra DB in the game.  I think they used more four DBs in this game, which means Chung may hav more »

  • Posted 12/21/2014 05:23:50 EST

    Gotta be a little concerned about the D's inability to get off the field.  That's becoming a rather consistent problem.  

    more »

Sections
Shortcuts

Share