user_3928595's Page


This member hasn't added any personal information yet.

Leave user_3928595 a message to find out more.

All Recent Activity

  • Forum Post: Ty Warren

    Posted 11/25/2010 07:34:54 EST

    In Response to Re: Ty Warren: In Response to Re: Ty Warren : They should all attend period (and that includes you know who).  If Warren had attended he might have been in better football shape and mig more »

  • Posted 11/24/2010 03:21:11 EST

    In Response to ARRINGTON AS A DE...BB is the man!: You wont see it vs Detroit but NY is gonna see it! BB is the man! I just HOPE Butler can at least do what he did in the 2nd half against the colts... more »

  • Posted 11/23/2010 09:12:14 EST

    In Response to Re: PATS HOLD IMPORTANT TIEBREAKER OVER JETS: With six games left in the season, the focus is on beating the team in front of you and letting the rest of the detritus sort itself out. W more »

  • Posted 11/23/2010 08:52:58 EST

    In Response to Re: McCourty Vs. Wilson: Come on guys.  McCourty looks like a solid player for years to come and imagine where that secondary would be without him.  He looks like the better player so f more »

  • Posted 11/23/2010 08:38:17 EST

    Hey Capnfoxboro, Good info! Thanks for taking the time to break it all down. You do a better job explaining than the newspapers do! more »

  • Posted 11/21/2010 08:20:10 EST

    "once ordered a spy kit from a Boys Life magazine (and the">X-ray glasses that allow you to see through skin and layers of clothing) but I more »

  • Posted 11/20/2010 02:51:00 EST

    In Response to Re: The Vernon Gholston thread: In Response to Re: The Vernon Gholston thread : Looks like you are the stupid one.  I posted 3 fail drafts, not 2.  What draft genius goes 3 straight fai more »

  • Posted 11/19/2010 05:44:16 EST

    In Response to Re: Thank you Pats for Seymour!: In Response to Thank you Pats for Seymour! : Oh, Latex Head..... Good to see that finally you're seeing positive results in the 7th year of a 2 year reb more »

  • Posted 11/18/2010 02:51:02 EST

    Folks as I said earlier Quagmire is a real live service member serving in the Army in Afgahnistan. As you can tell by the number of my posts, I do not live and die or let this chat room dictate my lif more »

  • Posted 11/18/2010 09:22:02 EST

    In Response to Re: Suggs Still Mouthing Off: The tone of this particular response suggests (to me) that this Quagmire guy is another one of Sybil's bits and would sh*t himself if anybody even said the more »

  • Forum Post: Playoff Prediction

    Posted 11/18/2010 06:32:39 EST

    In Response to Re: Playoff Prediction: Not sure how the experts could choose the Pats as the #1 team given they got pounded by the Browns, Beat a Steeler team coming off of a Monday Night Game and wit more »

  • Posted 11/16/2010 08:54:25 EST

    In Response to Re: Did Mangini TANK OT to get back at BB?: In Response to Re: Did Mangini TANK OT to get back at BB? : ...thanks Glen. Same thought here..."I like where this is going" Posted by RipFac more »

  • Posted 11/16/2010 06:02:23 EST

    In Response to Did Mangini TANK OT to get back at BB?:  Is his dislike for the pats/bb more then his dislike for the team that sent him to cleveland. How else can you describe the inexplicable play ca more »

  • Posted 11/15/2010 06:57:28 EST

    Although it looked like Hinesy ducked his head just prior to the hit, I think your pretty close with the 75K and 1 game. more »

  • Forum Post: Game ball

    Posted 11/15/2010 06:37:43 EST

    In Response to Re: Game ball:

    In Response to Re: Game ball : game ball to the guy who dumped O'Brien in Lake Erie.
    Posted by BradyMossFan

    hahaha that is some funny stuff! And I agree 100%!!
    more »

  • Posted 11/13/2010 08:46:53 EST

    In Response to Re: Bottom Line - NO RECEIVERS!!!!! and PREDICTABLE PLAYCALLING!!!!!: All the doom and gloom.  Must be in the New Englander's blood lines.  Proably the years of watching the Sox until 2 more »

  • Posted 11/13/2010 08:31:15 EST

    In Response to 3 straight losses and ending up 10-6: With the loss to the Browns and how the Patriots played I see 2 more losses in a row coming up. My predictions on the rest of the season: Lose to s more »

  • Posted 11/13/2010 08:13:30 EST

    In Response to Re: Trading #1 to Miami or Buffalo: LMMFAO , "When we win the SB" , take it easy buddy , we just lost to Cleveland and could only put up 14. We got maybe the most complete team in the l more »

  • Posted 11/12/2010 09:14:05 EST

    In Response to Re: Predict Brady's Performance for Sunday (civil Homers and Koolaid drinkers welcome) put your money where your mouths are.: In Response to Re: Predict Brady's Performance for Sunday ( more »

  • Posted 11/12/2010 08:54:31 EST

    In Response to Re: Revisting the Laura Maroney trade: 2011 Patriots Draft Picks This is the list of the Patriots draft picks going more »

  • Posted 11/11/2010 02:07:01 EST

    In Response to Re: Revisting the Laura Maroney trade: The Seattle pick is the higher of the 2 picks .... So in fact It will be the pats pick not the Denver pick. Posted by hoyle Sorry Hoyle but your w more »

  • Posted 11/11/2010 03:03:59 EST

    In Response to Re: Revisting the Laura Maroney trade: P-Mick pick 100 compared to 184 is a better crap shot for me. Also Its very likerly this Denver pick  whick i think will be a top 5 in next years more »

  • Posted 11/06/2010 10:37:15 EDT

    In Response to Re: Predictions for Pats vs Browns this sunday:

    (Clubber Lane voice)  Prediction?  Pain! Patriots 45 Bowns 17
    Posted by BradyMossFan

    Clubber Lane voice? Thats some funny sh!t!!
    more »

  • Posted 11/06/2010 08:23:26 EDT

    flutie66: "sooner or later the pats will have to start putting up some numbers or i feel they cant keep winning" WHO CARES WHAT YOU THINK. The next time you just want to see your name online at least more »

  • Posted 11/02/2010 04:31:57 EDT

    Sorry Hang but I am with southshorelurker on this one. Your very naive or living in fantasy land if you really think Mankins came back because of Moss press conference. Mankins and his agent are all a more »