Posted 12/10/2014 11:09:56 EST
In response to Joebreidey's comment: In response to sjddaj's comment: [QUOTE] In response to fishers5's comment: [QUOTE] Are you sure you would trade many so called assets for any pitcher for 1 year?? more »
Posted 12/10/2014 10:53:24 EST
In response to fishers5's comment: Are you sure you would trade many so called assets for any pitcher for 1 year?? cant disagree with other suggestions Always Right.....at least in my mind There would more »
Posted 12/10/2014 10:33:34 EST
Disagree. They be fools to get rid of Mookie. Read my last post on "how to fix loss of Lester" and see what you think.
Posted 12/10/2014 10:25:55 EST
With all of the resources the Sox have, fixing the loss of Lester should actually be pretty easy. **** First off, why is Swihart so "untoucable"? Especially when you consider the type of player he c more »
Posted 12/01/2014 12:03:32 EST
In response to Joebreidey's comment: In response to xxcodyfxx's comment: [QUOTE] In response to stan17's comment: Not sure of Zimms contract status. But, if he is locked up for a couple of years, I w more »
Posted 12/01/2014 11:17:48 EST
In response to BosoxJoe5's comment: The PawSox are just currently affiliated with the Red Sox. Every so often they have to sign. New contract. The Red Sox own the players and baseball staff. The PawSo more »
Posted 12/01/2014 10:55:45 EST
In response to S5's comment: In response to sjddaj's comment: [QUOTE] This news confused me and asking for some help on he matter. I thought that the Sox ownership owned everything, including all of more »
Posted 12/01/2014 10:50:06 EST
I like a healthy Latos over all of them. However, since that rarely happens, Zimm. is my next choice. Over Hamels as well. However, I wouldn't trade Betts (or Xander) for anyone except maybe Sale. more »
Posted 12/01/2014 10:31:58 EST
This news confused me and asking for some help on he matter. I thought that the Sox ownership owned everything, including all of the minor league affiliates? Aren't the Sox in charge of who the mana more »
Posted 09/06/2014 09:50:50 EDT
When he was "really" young? Never heard that. Does that also mean he is dumed there forever? He doesn't have a position because Pedey is at 2b and Bogaerts is so highly though of (and understandabl more »
Posted 09/06/2014 09:05:07 EDT
Don't get me wrong, I would love to see the Sox be able to keep both of these guys. But, if they had to trade one (which seems to be the indication), why does Bogaerts always seem to be the better on more »
Posted 02/16/2014 08:05:54 EST
If it is such a fixed sport, why bother to follow it? For a real response: there is a BIG difference between going to the WS and winning the WS. Completely different years they had following WS wins more »
Posted 01/21/2014 01:21:30 EST
Haven't been around in awhile, so apologies if this has been addressed (I am not about to ready the entire thread). I have for the longest time felt that this question is one of the most ridiculous th more »
Posted 12/13/2013 01:42:35 EST
Very true, very smart.
It is still their way of doing things. Signing free agents and putting little attention to drafting players.
Posted 12/13/2013 01:25:45 EST
Well, they did say that the Sox aren't finished yet, so lets see what else they are going to do. But I agree 100% that they need to do something with the OF, which they probably will. I think they n more »
Posted 12/13/2013 12:52:08 EST
Everybody is trying to figure how low the Yankees first draft pick is going to be. Is this really a surprise to anyone? Isn't this the "Yankee way" for the past 15 years or so? Signing high price more »
Posted 12/06/2013 01:25:23 EST
If Stanton is not available at all, well then fine. I guess a lot of the other posters out there also have the mindset of "if" he was available. However, ...... If Doubront was the pitcher, then fin more »
Posted 12/06/2013 01:07:14 EST
WOW! If 4 good prospects (Bradley Jr, Middlebooks, Vasquez or Swihart, and say DeLaRosa, Webster or Barnes) plus a solid guy in Nava wouldn't get it done, then why is he even talked about? I would more »
Posted 12/06/2013 12:51:20 EST
Assuming the Sox sign one of the OF'ers that have been mentioned (Kemp, Either, Shoo, or Granderson), as well as Drew, I think all of these guys are expendable. But, would it be enough? JBJ, Middleb more »
Posted 09/23/2013 01:09:51 EDT
Granted, he been absolutely awesome, dominating, etc. Better than I thought he would be. But, shocked as much as everyone else seems to be? Not really. Just look at least years numbers in a hitter more »
Posted 01/26/2013 08:18:47 EST
I mean "wouldn't" think that Lackey is as sure of a bounce back as the other guys.
Posted 01/26/2013 08:08:54 EST
- I can't think of a single reason why not to expect Lester from bouncing back. I would actually lean on saying that it is a sure thing. - Health is the only thing that will keep Buch from bouncing more »
Posted 01/26/2013 07:49:22 EST
Train -you can't predict on who is going to get hurt in the future and who isn't. Very poor comment.
I rather have Sweeney than Nava though.
Posted 01/18/2013 04:10:51 EST
Sorry Moon. Never really learned how to copy and paste a comment from a different poster to show the difference in "boldness" indicating the comment from poster to another.
Posted 01/18/2013 04:07:41 EST
That's the gamble. If he does much better this year, we'll wish we had locked him up at a reasonable rate this winter. He improved immensely on defense and handling the staff last summer. He's at a more »
©2014 Boston Globe Media Partners, LLC
Separate multiple addresses with a comma