GaiusJuliusCaesarAugustusGermani's Page

GaiusJuliusCaesarAugustusGermani

About Me: When not out to lunch, I'm not all there.

All Recent Activity

  • Posted 11/03/2010 11:44:13 EDT

    woo hoo? spelting is not your strong suit smarmy.

  • Posted 11/02/2010 07:34:01 EDT

    In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation: [QUOTE]I think the Constitution was an extremely liberal document for it's time.  Democracy over a monarch?  A very liberal idea. Much of the Constitut more »

  • Posted 11/02/2010 07:29:28 EDT

    In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation : Average people can get themselves educated: on the Constitution AND the legal precedents that more »

  • Posted 11/02/2010 07:28:47 EDT

    In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation : See, that's where you are wrong.  A society that feels that the constitution is out of reach o more »

  • Posted 11/02/2010 06:54:31 EDT

    In Response to Re: What ever happened to Samurai Jack?: [QUOTE]You are right.  The Jack thread has been the most popular of the last 100 days. Do you remenber what dante told you before he left?  And more »

  • Posted 11/02/2010 06:52:31 EDT

    Favorite BDC Infectious Virus song? I'll vote Dante's Peen-us In Tight Jeans sung to the tune of Venus in Blue Jeans



    more »

  • Posted 11/02/2010 06:42:53 EDT

    A momma's boy by day, s-whackeray, a sock puppet, spends his nights posting at BDC until he finds a programming job at a lame News Paper site. His postings are hilariously pathetic in a tough e-hood w more »

  • Posted 11/02/2010 05:58:30 EDT

    In Response to Re: Caligula: Little Soldier's Boot: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Caligula: Little Soldier's Boot : plank: It's posts like yours above that remind me why you are/always have been/always wi more »

  • Posted 10/24/2010 02:58:11 EDT

    In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation : Gregginmeffa:  I've tried to get through to them, and all I get is that I don't understand the more »

  • Posted 10/24/2010 02:56:17 EDT

    In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation : maybe I'm missing something.  Maintaining a military is constitutionally mandated, as is POTUS more »

  • Posted 10/24/2010 02:48:21 EDT

    In Response to Re: Do the democrats have a Jewish Problem?: [QUOTE]how bout PLO and PA over the years.  Those countries used the Pals as pawns, and when they got their a55es kicked, said See Ya Posted more »

  • Posted 10/23/2010 11:40:59 EDT

    In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation : BobinVA:  Save your breath.  Talking to these guys are like talking to a dining room table. Po more »

  • Posted 10/23/2010 11:39:53 EDT

    In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation : Original intent of those who signed it. It does not require interpretation, it is written in p more »

  • Posted 10/23/2010 11:36:24 EDT

    In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation : Defense is one ofthe two key imperatives for the federal government.  Stop being so obtuse. Po more »

  • Posted 10/23/2010 11:32:33 EDT

    In Response to Re: Do the democrats have a Jewish Problem?: [QUOTE]I still wonder why the Palestinians are REALLY pi55ed off at Egypt, Syria and Jordan? Posted by GreginMeffa[/QUOTE] To be fair you'd more »

  • Posted 10/23/2010 05:10:16 EDT

    My screen name? Caligula is my name. I'm a highly misunderstood demi-god. I love the great outdoors, children, women, men, animals, foreign objects, and yes sock puppets. Though after my last few expe more »

  • Posted 10/23/2010 04:58:21 EDT

    In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation: [QUOTE]"And what I don't understand is your inabilty to accept two hundred years of legal precedents (all by people who know much more than you on the more »

  • Posted 10/23/2010 02:35:52 EDT

    In Response to Re: Obama vs. The US. Chamber of Commerce: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Obama vs. The US. Chamber of Commerce : So you agree SEIU and UAW should too then? How about Obama's 2008 Internet d more »

  • Posted 10/23/2010 02:30:48 EDT

    In Response to Re: Do the democrats have a Jewish Problem?:
    [QUOTE]Yes.
    Posted by macnh1[/QUOTE]
    Barney Frank, Rahm Emmanuel, David Axelrod, et al. may wish to disgree. more »

  • Posted 10/23/2010 02:27:46 EDT

    In Response to Do the democrats have a Jewish Problem?: [QUOTE]I am not saying the Democrats are anti semitic or anything like that. But politically, do they have a Jewish problem? Whatisnow made a co more »

  • Posted 10/23/2010 02:22:26 EDT

    In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation: [QUOTE]There are apparently a growing number of people coming out of the woodwork who appear to genuinely believe that all one has to do to understand more »

  • Posted 10/23/2010 02:18:00 EDT

    In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation : Red herrings, so I won't reply, except to say, my religious beleifs don't alter the orignal in more »

  • Posted 10/23/2010 02:08:15 EDT

    In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation : Original intent of those who signed it. It does not require interpretation, it is written in p more »

  • Posted 10/23/2010 02:05:35 EDT

    In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Consitutional Interpretation : Defense is one ofthe two key imperatives for the federal government.  Stop being so obtuse. Po more »

  • Posted 10/23/2010 05:50:11 EDT

    Caligula replies to the original poster: If you confuse Democrats with the Left, then I guess you could see things this way. more »

Share