CTChris's Page

CTChris

MALE

All Recent Activity

  • Posted 05/07/2013 03:53:30 EDT

     Alex Speier 7m
    Webster will get a start - not tonight (Dempster). Guessing it would be Wed, w/Doubront getting an extra day if not needed in pen tonight

  • Posted 05/07/2013 03:47:14 EDT

     Scott Lauber 1m
    Not sure yet if he's active, but Allen Webster is with #RedSox, who need long man in bullpen after Mortensen threw 42 pitches last night

  • Posted 04/21/2013 08:13:44 EDT

    I'm wondering if the folks who live outside NESN's coverage area will be blacked out for tonights game. Our game starts at 7:00, but ESPN's Sunday Night Baseball starts at 8:00pm. Even though I have M more »

  • Posted 03/21/2013 12:24:01 EDT

    In response to ctredsoxfanhugh's comment:   Maybe he is ready, maybe he is not.  He's obviously playing at a very high level but spring training stats need to be talking with a grain of salt....more l more »

  • Posted 03/21/2013 12:02:27 EDT

    In response to softlaw2's comment:   Keeping him out for 9 games vs losing another full year of control is probably the smart move here. Add to it that the kid has yet to play AAA ball and I think the more »

  • Posted 03/21/2013 11:40:04 EDT

    In response to hill55's comment: What if Jackie Bradley spends 15 days at Pawtucket and then posts a .230/.290/.310/.600 line for the Red Sox in his first 150 plate appearances by early June? Do the R more »

  • Posted 03/21/2013 11:21:14 EDT

    In response to UnionFallsNY's comment:   Are the Sox playing in any warm weather or in a dome  in the first two weeks?   Not really. They don't hit a warmer weather state until the begining of May whe more »

  • Posted 03/21/2013 11:08:18 EDT

    In response to maxbialystock's comment: You can read it yourself, but he does a typically excellent job of presenting both sides.  He predicts Bradley will be at Pawtucket for the first 11 days, those more »

  • Posted 03/18/2013 02:46:57 EDT

    In response to moonslav59's comment:   In response to mef429's comment:   In response to moonslav59's comment:   In response to RedsoxProspects' comment:   Marrero looks like a mlb caliber glove at so more »

  • Posted 02/10/2013 08:38:02 EST

    In response to notin's comment: Why not?   His not necessarily worse  than some of the other LF options the Sox have right now... The Sox 40 man roster is at 40. Picking him up would require the Sox t more »

  • Posted 02/06/2013 06:00:15 EST

    No offense there Mystic, but if he's a newbie to FL waters, he's better off just getting a guide or a local (sane) fan to take him out. There are so many different types of fish to go for off the coas more »

  • Posted 01/30/2013 05:11:00 EST

    In response to nhsteven's comment:   In response to GoUconn13's comment:   In response to nhsteven's comment:   In response to GoUconn13's comment:   No way!!  If Yankees voided his contract, I am sur more »

  • Posted 01/25/2013 05:11:12 EST

    In response to HelloItsMeAgain1's comment: I agree. Preseason pitching projections can be (and usually are) a crap shoot that seldom have a ton of accuracy attached to them.   With that in mind, here' more »

  • Posted 01/25/2013 05:00:10 EST

    In response to moonslav59's comment: It's nearly impossible to project what Lackey will do in 2013. We don't really know how good he would have been in 2011 had he not pitched injured all year. Was hi more »

  • Posted 01/21/2013 06:03:00 EST

    In response to BMav's comment:   I might do the trade, but I don't add ANYTHING to it. Straight up, take it or leave it. Even though I think Jones is an OK player and a solid fit, I think he should ha more »

  • Posted 01/15/2013 06:32:07 EST

    In response to kimsaysthis' comment: [QUOTE] Still don't get why this testing is going to be done out of the country. There's no way that's an accident. It's kinda like Colon's surgery out of the coun more »

  • Forum Post: Rethinking 2013

    Posted 01/08/2013 04:57:13 EST

    And if "CTChris" or whatever and his pals from the other board don't want my comments to follow their remarks, perhaps they should leave my name out of them instead of putting up slamming posts. Just more »

  • Forum Post: Rethinking 2013

    Posted 01/08/2013 10:01:57 EST

    I know pitching is our number one need, but Stanton is a once in a decade opportunity knocking. We can address the pitching in another trade or a FA signing next winter. Sure, because we all know that more »

  • Forum Post: Rethinking 2013

    Posted 01/08/2013 07:56:19 EST

    In response to Beantowne's comment: [QUOTE] In response to CTChris's comment: [QUOTE] In response to Beantowne's comment: [QUOTE] GM CT, Let's talk some ball and get this thread back on track... Moon more »

  • Forum Post: Rethinking 2013

    Posted 01/08/2013 07:03:15 EST

    In response to Beantowne's comment: [QUOTE] GM CT, Let's talk some ball and get this thread back on track... Moon and I tried to start a discusion about the aquisition of Stanton. I framed the questio more »

  • Forum Post: Rethinking 2013

    Posted 01/07/2013 05:43:16 EST

    In response to moonslav59's comment: [QUOTE] Doubront really bummed me out when he came to camp out of shape in 2011. I had high expectation for him, and felt let down. He looked good at times last ye more »

  • Forum Post: Rethinking 2013

    Posted 01/06/2013 02:23:00 EST

    Lackey is a tough call JB. I don't have any insight into his specific situation, but I can share what my expectations of him are. To the best of my knowledge, most pitchers coming off TJ surgery go th more »

  • Forum Post: Rethinking 2013

    Posted 01/05/2013 09:35:48 EST

    In response to Beantowne's comment: [QUOTE] In response to Hfxsoxnut's comment: [QUOTE] In response to CTChris' comment: [QUOTE] In response to Joebreidey's comment: [QUOTE] I already did.  767 runs s more »

  • Forum Post: Rethinking 2013

    Posted 01/05/2013 09:19:25 EST

    In response to Hfxsoxnut's comment: [QUOTE] In response to CTChris' comment: [QUOTE] In response to Joebreidey's comment: [QUOTE] I already did.  767 runs scored, 676 against. [/QUOTE] Based on last s more »

Sections
Shortcuts

Share