Big_Bad_Jim's Page

Big_Bad_Jim

FEMALE

All Recent Activity

  • Posted 06/15/2011 07:02:35 EDT

    The media and the left have spent all their resources in an attempt to destroy Palin...and they have failed.  They would not spend so much time if they did not fear her. email gate, revere gate, marga more »

  • Posted 06/15/2011 06:57:06 EDT

    If Palin wasn't a threat, the LSM and liberals would not be spending so much time trying to destroy her. She has a core of dedicated supporters, can raise money, and can enter the race in the future a more »

  • Posted 06/14/2011 05:41:42 EDT

    People are waiting to see if Sarah runs....the nomination is hers if she does.  There are separate threads on the debate. This one is for laughing at the dummies in the liberal media and those on the more »

  • Posted 06/14/2011 05:39:28 EDT

    Palin has more name recognition than all the other candidates combined.  Plus she has a core of dedicated supporters who will contribut to her run.  The nomination is hers for the taking.  The questio more »

  • Posted 06/14/2011 05:36:26 EDT

    Really fun watching Palin turn the media into the equivilent of the three stooges...only not as cute. Joan Venomocchi, Mags the Hag Eagen and Mo Dowd must be....well they are not happy campers right n more »

  • Posted 06/14/2011 05:31:19 EDT

    In Response to Re: The British think Palin is an idiot too: [QUOTE]Is there a difference between Sarah Palin and Lucy McGillicuddy Ricardo ? Posted by Sistersledge[/QUOTE] Is there a difference betwee more »

  • Posted 06/14/2011 05:23:57 EDT

    Sarah was right on her factoids per the Chair of the History Department at Suffolk Univ and reluctantly by per the Vicar of Christ's Church and per anyone with basic knowledge of the pre revolutionary more »

  • Posted 06/12/2011 09:00:58 EDT

    In Response to Re: The British think Palin is an idiot too: [QUOTE]Next she will be telling us that Charlton Heston really did defeat the British at the Battle of New Orleans ! Posted by Sistersledge[ more »

  • Posted 06/12/2011 08:55:15 EDT

    In Response to Re: Palin Mangles Paul Revere: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Palin Mangles Paul Revere : So Sarah what are you going to do when you run out of stupid things to say to the nobins .   OH cry more »

  • Posted 06/12/2011 08:50:29 EDT

    In Response to Re: Palin Mangles Paul Revere: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Palin Mangles Paul Revere : If you honestly think that Revere's plan in making his ride was to warn the Crown of the danger of t more »

  • Posted 06/12/2011 08:41:28 EDT

    In Response to Re: Palin Mangles Paul Revere: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Palin Mangles Paul Revere : Gee, I say you might be overly charitable and you call me the stupid dimwitted one. Class act you go more »

  • Posted 06/12/2011 06:43:50 EDT

    In Response to Re: The British think Palin is an idiot too: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: The British think Palin is an idiot too : Hahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! Posted by AlleyCatBruin[/QUOTE] He more »

  • Posted 06/12/2011 06:36:35 EDT

    In Response to Long-lost Sarah Palin surfaces in emails: [QUOTE]http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/56750.html From Politico, hardly a home for conservatives. She was hands-on and averse to part more »

  • Posted 06/12/2011 06:32:25 EDT

    In Response to Re: Long-lost Sarah Palin surfaces in emails: [QUOTE]  Sarah Palin is a (bleepin") idiot and those that support her incoherent views are just as stupid or insane or whatever.....relagat more »

  • Posted 06/12/2011 06:29:57 EDT

    In Response to What emerges repeatedly in the e mails: [QUOTE]Gaining a full sense of Palin's focus is difficult because the state heavily redacted her correspondence, particularly emails regarding po more »

  • Posted 06/12/2011 06:27:29 EDT

    In Response to Re: Breaking News from Sarah Palin emails: Palin didn't squander trillion dollars to buy 9.1 percent unemployment, $4 gas & threat of double dip recession.: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Br more »

  • Posted 06/12/2011 06:18:10 EDT

    In Response to Re: Palin Mangles Paul Revere: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Palin Mangles Paul Revere : Reubenhop, we don't always agree, but you are 100% correct in this case. The funny thing is why can' more »

  • Posted 06/12/2011 06:10:24 EDT

    In Response to Re: Palin Mangles Paul Revere: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Palin Mangles Paul Revere : If you think that Palin knew that Revere was captured and told the British of the alarm going out th more »

  • Posted 06/12/2011 11:12:33 EDT

    beKool,  you post a media account of an event.  The media requested all these emails with a lot of hoop la, even though it hasn't deleved into such information for other candidates indicated bias on t more »

  • Posted 06/12/2011 11:05:28 EDT

    In Response to Re: The British think Palin is an idiot too: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: The British think Palin is an idiot too : Heyseed, isn't it pathetic how the Baggers and ditto-morons are so quick more »

  • Posted 06/12/2011 10:58:11 EDT

    Uh, Alley Cat, apparently you are ignorant about Revere because Palin was right.  Here is a link to an interview with the chair of the Hist. Dept.  at Suffolk Univ.  Read it, if you can, and learn som more »

  • Posted 06/12/2011 10:45:56 EDT

    lawboy and others insult America by distorting its history.  Palin was right.  Here is a link to an interview with the chair of the Hist. Dept at Suffolk U. (those in Boston should know where it is lo more »

  • Posted 06/12/2011 10:31:40 EDT

    In Response to Re: Palin Mangles Paul Revere: [QUOTE]Now they go to, "he didn't ring bells". Ya think? The guys with bells rang them. Can I get a duhhhhhhh!!!! Posted by GreginMeffa[/QUOTE] Boy do you more »

Share