slomag's Page

slomag

This member hasn't added any personal information yet.


Leave slomag a message to find out more.

All Recent Activity

  • Forum Post: Craig gone?

    Posted 03/30/2015 12:15:03 EDT

    In response to moonslav59's comment:   Victorino can get just as many PAs and he can be used as a pinch-runner. Craig has proven he is healthy and has looked good at the plate. Victorino's value has o more »

  • Posted 03/30/2015 11:32:09 EDT

    The Victorino proposal is exactly why we need to hold onto him - nobody values him right now, but he can be a dynamic player when healthy.  As a fan, how do I benefit from trading him for the Giants 2 more »

  • Posted 03/29/2015 04:59:13 EDT

    In response to ebaB's comment: In response to slomag's comment:   That article is awful.  It reads like a jilted girl-friend pouting to her diary.   Shaughnessy starts the article by pretending he has more »

  • Forum Post: Craig gone?

    Posted 03/29/2015 03:59:03 EDT

    In response to moonslav59's comment: Victorino can get just as many PAs and he can be used as a pinch-runner. Craig has proven he is healthy and has looked good at the plate. Victorino's value has onl more »

  • Posted 03/29/2015 02:44:20 EDT

    In response to ctredsoxfanhugh's comment:  You can raise your stock in spring, but by no means can you "significantly" raise your stock in the spring.  Maybe in fantasy leagues you can but among actua more »

  • Forum Post: Craig gone?

    Posted 03/29/2015 02:31:34 EDT

    In response to moonslav59's comment: But, the thing that makes Craig more attractive to the Red Sox more than almost any other team is that his luxury tax number of just $6.2M. Only teams walking the more »

  • Posted 03/29/2015 02:06:56 EDT

    In response to moonslav59's comment: I actually see this the other way around - Middlebrooks is having a great Spring. He's only increased in value since the trade. If we had waited, we could probably more »

  • Posted 03/28/2015 11:27:52 EDT

    In response to ebaB's comment: In response to slasher9's comment: great article on espn   http://espn.go.com/boston/mlb/story/_/id/12565867/david-ortiz-boston-red-sox-says-never-knowingly-took-steroid more »

  • Posted 03/28/2015 10:23:03 EDT

    In response to Flapjack07's comment: This Vazquez stuff is starting to sound ominous. My two immediate thoughts are: 1) The backup catcher people were complaining we only got for Middlebrooks just got more »

  • Posted 03/27/2015 08:46:25 EDT

    Williams and Ortiz were terrific, but neither ever hit .487 so I'm going with Mookie Betts :)

     

    more »

  • Posted 03/27/2015 08:40:40 EDT

    In response to mfymfy's comment: In response to ThatWasMe's comment: In response to mfymfy's comment:      Not to be argumentative but if you're talking about Esmil Rogers (btw, 2.92 ERA with a K per more »

  • Posted 03/27/2015 06:50:15 EDT

    In response to mfymfy's comment: In response to ctredsoxfanhugh's comment: Oh Eovaldi is a strike out pitcher??? Yes his 6.3 lifetime K/9 just screams swing and miss stuff, love that he led the league more »

  • Posted 03/27/2015 01:16:38 EDT

    In response to pinstripezac35's comment: In response to slomag's comment: I think it's more effective than you give it credit for.  I think there will always be fringe players taking a chance to draw more »

  • Posted 03/27/2015 12:32:26 EDT

    In response to pinstripezac35's comment: In response to Hfxsoxnut's comment: I still can't see how not testing would be a better system.   I wasn't suggesting not testing, just pointing out IMO a big more »

  • Posted 03/27/2015 12:15:54 EDT

    In response to Flapjack07's comment: In response to pinstripezac35's comment: since day 1 my problem with testing is that it allows people to think just because a player did not fail he's clean True. more »

  • Posted 03/27/2015 11:27:15 EDT

    In response to jete02fan's comment: [QUOTE] In response to Kingface12's comment: In response to pumpsie-green's comment: In response to Flapjack07's comment: Here's the original link...it's pretty ter more »

  • Posted 03/26/2015 07:06:16 EDT

    In response to southpaw777's comment: In response to moonslav59's comment:   Nobody likes the idea of Swihart playing 1 out of every 3 games, but it shouldn't be for too long. If it ends up being long more »

  • Posted 03/26/2015 06:35:02 EDT

    In response to moonslav59's comment:   Where are all the posters mad about the Middy for Hanigan trade?   Sox4ever I think I was the only one, but I wanted Geovany Soto, who looks healthy and is havin more »

  • Posted 03/26/2015 03:07:06 EDT

    In response to notin's comment: In response to slomag's comment: What are the roster ramifications?  If we don't go with Swihart do we have to release somebody? Not necessarily.    DFA does not always more »

  • Posted 03/26/2015 02:13:13 EDT

    What are the roster ramifications?  If we don't go with Swihart do we have to release somebody?

    more »

  • Posted 03/26/2015 11:27:49 EDT

    I think the reality is if we traded Humberto Quintero for Clayton Kershaw, the rotation would still be loaded with "what ifs".  We'll have a lot of those questions answered by July, when there could b more »

  • Posted 03/25/2015 04:20:04 EDT

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment: In response to slomag's comment: In response to ThatWasMe's comment: In response to slomag's comment:   Do you know anything about your own team?  Chamberlain had a more »

  • Posted 03/25/2015 04:02:22 EDT

    In response to ThatWasMe's comment: In response to slomag's comment: FWIW, so far this Spring, Betances looks a lot closer to the 600 minor-league innings than the 90 dominant major-league innings.  9 more »

  • Posted 03/25/2015 01:18:09 EDT

    FWIW, so far this Spring, Betances looks a lot closer to the 600 minor-league innings than the 90 dominant major-league innings.  93 MPH with command issues. 

     

    more »

  • Posted 03/25/2015 11:44:10 EDT

    In response to pinstripezac35's comment: LMAO TMW can U believe all the love joba is all of a sudden getting from RSN of course we can we've been here 4 a while ;-)             Nobody loved Chamberlai more »

Sections
Shortcuts

Share