rockyracoon's Page

rockyracoon

MALE

rockyracoon's Forum Posts

  • Forum Post: WHERE IS JOHN SUNUNU??????????

    Posted 11/08/2012 05:13:09 EST

    In response to DirtyWaterLover's comment: [QUOTE] In response to NO MO O's comment: [QUOTE] YUP... lets get bigger govt, bigger deficits, more levels of beaurocracy, higher costs, fewer competetive in more »

  • Forum Post: America and the Value of 'Earned Success'

    Posted 05/10/2012 07:21:05 EDT

    US government spending compared to GDP is about %11 not %36. more »

  • Forum Post: Ooops- Another Obama Lie... ObamaCare will cost $1.76 TRILLION

    Posted 03/19/2012 05:25:11 EDT

    The republicans played with the math on this one.  There were estimated costs that increased which the repubs are happy to tell you all about but there were also many increases in the estimated saving more »

  • Forum Post: Santorum To Save U.S. From Scourge Of Pornography

    Posted 03/17/2012 09:32:26 EDT

    In Response to Re: Santorum To Save U.S. From Scourge Of Pornography: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Santorum To Save U.S. From Scourge Of Pornography : So we should get rid of all "questionable" tv shows more »

  • Forum Post: Santorum To Save U.S. From Scourge Of Pornography

    Posted 03/17/2012 09:28:35 EDT

    In Response to Re: Santorum To Save U.S. From Scourge Of Pornography: [QUOTE]For the life of me I cannot understand these idiots. Rick, if you do not like porn do not watch it. Moonbats get all upset more »

  • Forum Post: Santorum To Save U.S. From Scourge Of Pornography

    Posted 03/17/2012 09:20:17 EDT

    In Response to Re: Santorum To Save U.S. From Scourge Of Pornography: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Santorum To Save U.S. From Scourge Of Pornography : Whatever happened to PARENTS monitoring what their k more »

  • Forum Post: Arizona Republicans want to force women to reveal whether they are having sex

    Posted 03/16/2012 10:26:27 EDT

    In Response to Re: Arizona Republicans want to force women to reveal whether they are having sex: [QUOTE]In Response to Arizona Republicans want to force women to reveal whether they are having sex : more »

  • Forum Post: Dear Rush Limbaugh

    Posted 03/15/2012 03:26:15 EDT

    In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh : It's not a false equivalency. You only say that because you're wrong. Deal with it. And Limbaugh did apologize. Yo more »

  • Forum Post: Dear Rush Limbaugh

    Posted 03/15/2012 03:19:21 EDT

    In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh : He did apologize..........twice. Posted by jmel[/QUOTE] If Sandra Fluke was your daughter, mother, sister or frien more »

  • Forum Post: Dear Rush Limbaugh

    Posted 03/15/2012 03:11:03 EDT

    There IS a huge difference between the conservative philosophy and the republican party. Would you call George W. Bush's term conservative? Why would a liberal vote republican? Another false equivalen more »

  • Forum Post: Dear Rush Limbaugh

    Posted 03/15/2012 02:32:43 EDT

    In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh : You must be blind then. Plenty of conservatives on BDC said what Rush said was wrong. That aside...what does this more »

  • Forum Post: Dear Rush Limbaugh

    Posted 03/15/2012 01:03:53 EDT

    In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh : Went over your head too huh? If you are going to comment on ones intelligence the least you can do is have some yo more »

  • Forum Post: Dear Rush Limbaugh

    Posted 03/15/2012 12:22:24 EDT

    In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh : It would be "you're" not "your". If you're going to throw out insults about intelligence the least you can do is k more »

  • Forum Post: Dear Rush Limbaugh

    Posted 03/15/2012 11:39:53 EDT

    In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh: [QUOTE]Rush got caught with his hand in the cookie jar and Bill Maher didn't.  Exactly my point! No one of any significance in the republican party has come out more »

  • Forum Post: Dear Rush Limbaugh

    Posted 03/15/2012 11:25:18 EDT

    In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh: [QUOTE]This of course is my opinion, so let's just say I'm wrong.  The right is basically saying that Rush's comments are justified because Bill Maher says bad t more »

  • Forum Post: Dear Rush Limbaugh

    Posted 03/15/2012 10:41:55 EDT

    To suggest that Bill Maher gets away with the things he says is absurd.  He lost a television show over comments he has made.  He received all kinds of flak over things he has said about Tim Tebow.  H more »

  • Forum Post: Dear Rush Limbaugh

    Posted 03/15/2012 09:58:47 EDT

    In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh : I`m sure he`s crying his eyes out!  He and his 20 million daily listeners. As I`ve said repeatedly, this will back more »

  • Forum Post: Former Palin Adviser: 'Game Change Was True Enough to Make Me Squirm'

    Posted 03/12/2012 07:45:49 EDT

    In Response to Re: Former Palin Adviser: 'Game Change Was True Enough to Make Me Squirm': [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Former Palin Adviser: 'Game Change Was True Enough to Make Me Squirm' : Different po more »

  • Forum Post: Dear Rush Limbaugh

    Posted 03/12/2012 06:09:06 EDT

    In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh : Two issues as I see them, (and I don`t care about this and wish it would go away) 1. Her father is affiliated with more »

  • Forum Post: Dear Rush Limbaugh

    Posted 03/12/2012 03:41:56 EDT

    In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Dear Rush Limbaugh : Well, except for the fact that it`s untrue. Fluke is a shill for the Democrats. And since when is calling someone more »

  • Forum Post: Former Palin Adviser: 'Game Change Was True Enough to Make Me Squirm'

    Posted 03/12/2012 12:20:18 EDT

    Twenty people can watch an event happening right in front of them and when questioned you may get twenty different accounts based on their own prejudices, conceptions or perceptions.  Just because the more »

  • Forum Post: Latest Rasmussen poll: the flip-flopping weak fractured-GOP-Party candidate Romney 48%; booming economy beneficiary, shoo-in for reelection incumbent Obama 43%

    Posted 03/10/2012 07:16:19 EST

    In Response to Re: Latest Rasmussen poll: the flip-flopping weak fractured-GOP-Party candidate Romney 48%; booming economy beneficiary, shoo-in for reelection incumbent Obama 43%: [QUOTE]RCP Average   more »

  • Forum Post: SO AMERICA, HOW DO YA LIKE THE LAZY CRAZY DAYS AT HARVARD WITH THE "BIG O"???

    Posted 03/10/2012 07:08:43 EST

    You're absolutely right. There really is no way to measure the effects of the stimulus. The best I can say is "At least we didn't go over the edge" The summer is going to end up determining everything more »

  • Forum Post: SO AMERICA, HOW DO YA LIKE THE LAZY CRAZY DAYS AT HARVARD WITH THE "BIG O"???

    Posted 03/10/2012 03:40:34 EST

    In Response to Re: SO AMERICA, HOW DO YA LIKE THE LAZY CRAZY DAYS AT HARVARD WITH THE "BIG O"???: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: SO AMERICA, HOW DO YA LIKE THE LAZY CRAZY DAYS AT HARVARD WITH THE "BIG O"?? more »

  • Forum Post: Latest Rasmussen poll: the flip-flopping weak fractured-GOP-Party candidate Romney 48%; booming economy beneficiary, shoo-in for reelection incumbent Obama 43%

    Posted 03/10/2012 02:13:06 EST

    In Response to Re: Latest Rasmussen poll: the flip-flopping weak fractured-GOP-Party candidate Romney 48%; booming economy beneficiary, shoo-in for reelection incumbent Obama 43%: [QUOTE]In Response t more »

Share