zbellino's Page

zbellino

MALE

zbellino's Forum Posts

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 07/02/2015 02:22:05 EDT

    In response to BabeParilli's comment: In response to zbellino's comment: In response to SLGDEV's comment:   In response to agcsbill's comment:   In response to SLGDEV's comment:   In response to fatsa more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 07/02/2015 01:59:35 EDT

    In response to BabeParilli's comment: In response to zbellino's comment: I'll add that iirc it was Hamilton (maybe Wilson) that even stated at the Convention that there would be no purpose to having a more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 07/02/2015 12:07:50 EDT

    In response to SLGDEV's comment: In response to agcsbill's comment: In response to SLGDEV's comment: In response to fatsam72's comment: In response to oklahomapatriot's comment: God created Adam and E more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 07/02/2015 10:51:38 EDT

    And let's stop presenting this as an "unpopular" issue that the SCOTUS has wrenched from public hands. Right now, it is not, and it is not likely to become unpopular in the near future. Gallup has it more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 07/02/2015 10:49:36 EDT

    I'll add that iirc it was Hamilton (maybe Wilson) that even stated at the Convention that there would be no purpose to having a Constitution if it were assumed that anything the government passes is c more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 07/02/2015 10:03:09 EDT

    In response to BabeParilli's comment: In response to zbellino's comment: As people in the Constitutional Convention asked at the time, what use would there even be for a court if it had no power? What more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 07/01/2015 06:45:18 EDT

    In response to IrishMob7's comment: In response to 347pg's comment: In response to IrishMob7's comment: In response to oklahomapatriot's comment: God created Adam and Eve. Not Adam and Steve or Amy an more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 07/01/2015 06:34:22 EDT

    For the thread: Judicial review existed in the SCOTUS well before Marbury v, in fact in Marbury the court didn't affirm Judical Review, rather it limited itself to its appelate function when one party more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 06/30/2015 12:16:15 EDT

    In response to seawolfxs' comment:    My real a gstt was the Obsmacare ruling by Roberts. This one was just pushed it the last few feet over the cliff.  So in other words, like many, you don't think t more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 06/30/2015 11:48:21 EDT

    In response to seawolfxs' comment: Z The reason I wrote this is to hear you and your take. We got Kennedy's opinion, the rebuttal, but then we don't get to have Kennedy's rejoinder But. At your first more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 06/30/2015 07:07:37 EDT

    In response to prolate0spheroid's comment: In response to zbellino's comment: In response to prolate0spheroid's comment: In response to BabeParilli's comment: In response to zbellino's comment:   I ag more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 06/30/2015 06:55:03 EDT

    In response to prolate0spheroid's comment: In response to BabeParilli's comment: In response to zbellino's comment:   I agree, and I find it curious that people would state that the Court's job is not more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 06/30/2015 06:43:32 EDT

    In response to BabeParilli's comment: I'll take the tyranny of the majority any day over the tyranny of 5 judges. There is not on ounce of tyranny here. It's a load of nonsense that Robert, Alito, Sca more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 06/30/2015 06:08:47 EDT

    In response to BabeParilli's comment: In response to zbellino's comment:   I agree, and I find it curious that people would state that the Court's job is not to render rulings in suits of constitution more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 06/30/2015 05:22:49 EDT

    In response to seawolfxs' comment: I just read all of the opinions,  I'm going to go ahead and guess it's the very first time you've ever read a legal opinion. None of the dissenters used religion or more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 06/29/2015 12:35:52 EDT

    In response to JohnHannahrulz's comment: The should really let the Nevada state gaming commission handle this one, might be less controversial that way. If they're having a lesbian wedding and the par more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 06/29/2015 12:24:21 EDT

    For the thread: 14th Amendment claims in this matter differentiate class to class and individual to individual. To deny the existence of a class of individuals even as you establish and support legisl more »

  • Forum Post: Honouring Our Past

    Posted 06/28/2015 09:32:56 EDT

    In response to prolate0spheroid's comment: In response to oklahomapatriot's comment: unkfnbelievable this thread is still going with all the BS in it. Pretty cool, eh?  It's like the freakin' draft th more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 06/28/2015 08:35:54 EDT

    In response to seawolfxs' comment: In response to prolate0spheroid's comment: In response to seawolfxs' comment: In response to prolate0spheroid's comment:   Even if being gay were a choice, what diff more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 06/28/2015 02:22:29 EDT

    In response to SLGDEV's comment: In response to oddlyenough's comment: I wonder if the churches which are against gay marriage feel more stongly about that or maintaining their tax-exempt status? Ther more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 06/28/2015 02:02:39 EDT

    In response to seawolfxs' comment: In response to oddlyenough's comment: I wonder if the churches which are against gay marriage feel more stongly about that or maintaining their tax-exempt status? Pa more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 06/28/2015 01:32:32 EDT

    In response to seawolfxs' comment: Z  I thought Dred Scott was that freed blavks couldn't be citizens , I could be wrong As far as DOMA and Tax treatment I do not disagree But they still deferred to m more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 06/28/2015 01:09:15 EDT

    In response to prolate0spheroid's comment: Z, it is Windsor, which was decided more recently than you remember, in June 2013, so just two years ago.   You are right that the majority found DOMA uncons more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 06/28/2015 12:08:19 EDT

    This is not true. One could easily state that Loving vs Virginia is equally invalid because black people and white people were both granted the right to marry ... just not each other. A black man can more »

  • Forum Post: OT: Marriage

    Posted 06/28/2015 11:16:47 EDT

    Those issues are irrelevant though Seawolf. You argue that Dred Scott was incorrect, and Dred Scott merely enforced standing congressional law. Does the fact that politicians before Emancipation didn' more »

Sections
Shortcuts