This member hasn't added any personal information yet.
Leave Hfxsoxnut a message to find out more.
Posted 10/04/2015 12:35:49 EDT
In response to BogieAt12oclock's comment: In response to J-BAY's comment: Song of the Day: âNext Yearâ by Foo Fighters. Another song of the day: "Enter the Young" by The Association. Have you got more »
Posted 10/04/2015 09:40:24 EDT
In response to crazy-world-of-troybrown's comment: O' Day will be 33 in Oct. he's making 4.25 this year. Averages about 65 games and innings a year, with Baltimore. ERA 1.92 with them, for his career. more »
Posted 10/04/2015 08:44:51 EDT
In response to ctredsoxfanhugh's comment: I think a 6 year deal with Bogaerts makes more sense. YOu guarantee his cost controlled years, and give him a pay raise in his arby years and buy out a few f more »
Posted 10/03/2015 11:32:11 EDT
I just think sub-500 teams should be mathematically eliminated a little earlier than the last week of the season. That's getting a little too close to the NHL.
Posted 10/03/2015 10:47:14 EDT
In response to notin's comment: Of the two, I take O'Day. I like Hill, but a 35yo pitcher with 4 good games in the past 7 years shouldn't get 3/$18mill from anyone. Even $6mill per year for O'Day se more »
Posted 10/03/2015 10:42:52 EDT
In response to pinstripezac35's comment: In response to Hfxsoxnut's comment: My point about Thomas was only directed at Looney Tunes Patty who thinks DH is a non-position. U know what I'm pondering more »
Posted 10/03/2015 10:38:33 EDT
In response to pumpsie-green's comment: I would first try to get Papelbon. He has pitched very well since he left here. Then I would go after a #1 SP. After that I would back fill the pen, but not wit more »
Posted 10/03/2015 10:27:46 EDT
In response to pumpsie-green's comment: In response to Hfxsoxnut's comment: I would take O'Day in that scenario. I wouldn't give three years to either one. One year plus an option is what I would offe more »
Posted 10/03/2015 10:26:23 EDT
In response to pinstripezac35's comment: In response to Hfxsoxnut's comment: In response to pinstripezac35's comment: sorry hfx in my neighborhood 58 & 88 isn't that close That's not really my point. more »
Posted 10/03/2015 10:23:04 EDT
In response to JoeBrady1's comment:
As others have said, Bogaerts for his consistency.
Posted 10/03/2015 10:20:01 EDT
In response to patrick-sullivan's comment: to DH fans, 58% = 88% even when the former had perennial MVP-caliber seasons as a full-time baseball player. a CLEAN, two-time MLB MVP, compared to a juicing more »
Posted 10/03/2015 10:16:01 EDT
I would take O'Day in that scenario.
Posted 10/03/2015 10:14:04 EDT
In response to pinstripezac35's comment: sorry hfx in my neighborhood 58 & 88 isn't that close That's not really my point. My point is, if DH's shouldn't be in the Hall, Thomas is out just as much as more »
Posted 10/03/2015 09:51:20 EDT
In response to pinstripezac35's comment: Frank Thomas says hello, wake up, smell the coffee. Frank says here's your coffee I'm more bothered by this comparrison than I am with a DH getting in frank more »
Posted 10/03/2015 09:25:55 EDT
Should a starting pitcher ever be a team MVP? All they do is throw the ball every 5th game.
Posted 10/03/2015 09:23:40 EDT
Should Frank Thomas be in the Hall of Fame?
Posted 10/03/2015 08:47:13 EDT
Someone really got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.
Posted 10/03/2015 08:39:10 EDT
In response to patrick-sullivan's comment:
Nope. the Hall is for baseball players. DH's are not.
Posted 10/02/2015 06:19:55 EDT
In response to pinstripezac35's comment: My point is that the new Wild Card deal didn't make anything more fair. it does 4 the division winners Sure, but why did we need to make things fairer for the more »
Posted 10/02/2015 06:06:07 EDT
In response to jasko2248's comment: Stanton is also a corner outfielder while Bogaerts is a SS. I'm not saying that the Stanton deal was a good one for Miami, either. I think a 6 year deal for Bogae more »
Posted 10/02/2015 03:17:16 EDT
In response to jasko2248's comment: I can agree to disagree here. As I mentioned earlier, Trout's agent was lambasted for negotiating that "deal." I'm not sure how you think "6/74" is a any kind of more »
Posted 10/02/2015 02:05:29 EDT
In response to dgalehouse's comment: A lot of wishful thinking going on here. And I love the explanations as to why it is in the players best interest to take a below market offer now. But it is more »
Posted 10/02/2015 02:02:09 EDT
In response to pinstripezac35's comment: In response to Hfxsoxnut's comment: Personally I find that the one-game play-ins reek of Bud Selig gimmickry. gim·mick noun a trick or device intended to attr more »
Posted 10/02/2015 12:00:20 EDT
Personally I find that the one-game play-ins reek of Bud Selig gimmickry.
Posted 10/02/2015 11:57:43 EDT
In response to Drewski5's comment: At 23 year olds out, I dont think either Betts or Boegarts will go 10 years. There best chance at maximizing value is 6 years, so they hit free-agency on the right more »
©2015 Boston Globe Media Partners, LLC
Separate multiple addresses with a comma