Streaming today's top alternative music & more
Your one-stop source for local innovation news
I'd click that
News & more from the state's leading resource
This member hasn't added any personal information yet.
Leave ATJ a message to find out more.
Posted 04/24/2014 06:10:55 EDT
In response to coolade2's comment: [QUOTE] Good to know the boards sarcastic dimwits are still around. not sure what the point is though.... [/QUOTE] Yes, well, we need them to offset the intellectua more »
Posted 04/24/2014 06:10:10 EDT
In response to IrishMob7's comment:[QUOTE]
Why would a Bills fan care how the Pats use Gronk?
[/QUOTE]I was just wondering the same thing.
Posted 04/22/2014 05:09:25 EDT
And how many 7th round picks are playing in the league? For an 'irrelevant' pick the S'hawks got a player with a mountain of talent. So why a 7th rounder versus sign him after he's released? The qu more »
Posted 04/22/2014 04:34:42 EDT
I like Ryan a lot. Big upside there. Entire secondary is vastly improved. And I know this is not the popular view here but I still don't see Browner playing much Safety if he plays the position at more »
Posted 04/22/2014 03:33:05 EDT
Any harm in taking a flyer for a 7th rounder? Not sure I see the downside of this.
Posted 04/22/2014 01:13:05 EDT
4/50, 30 gtd
Posted 04/22/2014 12:28:24 EDT
How long before BDC actually gets the message?
Posted 04/22/2014 12:27:07 EDT
I think this is grand theft and a sweet move by the Seahawks. Silly move, IMO, by the Raiders.
Posted 04/22/2014 12:26:08 EDT
But now I can. I love this site!!!
Posted 04/22/2014 12:25:43 EDT
In response to mellymel3's comment:[QUOTE]
Yep, nice trade for the hawks and the raiders get one step closer to a new GM...as usual
Posted 04/19/2014 05:59:41 EDT
Love that list of options and your priority. Only surprise for me was a QB as high as round 3 as well.
Posted 04/18/2014 05:26:49 EDT
Like the Keller move and I was hoping that sign Smith. Both of 'em low risk, high reward type signings, imo.
Posted 04/18/2014 04:23:18 EDT
Thinking Bruins in 5 particularly if Boston takes 1st 2 at the gahden.
Posted 04/18/2014 05:55:34 EDT
Windows 7 + Firefox here and is ok as well.
Posted 04/18/2014 05:34:25 EDT
In my opinion, Pats have a higher need at DT than WR.
Posted 04/18/2014 05:26:06 EDT
Hellooooo!!!???? <<Expectorate in back of laptop>> Hellooooo!!!???? <<Expectorate in back of laptip>>
Posted 04/17/2014 05:28:44 EDT
Posted 04/17/2014 04:44:56 EDT
Posted 04/16/2014 05:36:01 EDT
Posted 04/16/2014 05:35:10 EDT
Posted 04/15/2014 05:53:08 EDT
Posted 04/15/2014 12:07:43 EDT
Posted 04/15/2014 12:06:22 EDT
Posted 04/14/2014 05:34:47 EDT
Posted 04/14/2014 05:31:23 EDT
I simply do not see BB drafting a W/R in rd 1. As others are saying the Pats needs are higher on both sides of the line and at TE. Depth at LB is also a concern.