This member hasn't added any personal information yet.
Leave croc a message to find out more.
Posted 12/25/2014 12:36:03 EST
In response to notin's comment: [QUOTE] Like I said in the 2005 thread, many times aces get labeled "after he fact." In 2012, no one thiought Lester was. Minihane wrote a lengthy (and stupid) diatri more »
Posted 12/25/2014 09:23:11 EST
In response to moonslav59's comment: Did anyone really fear the Royals' starting rotation last winter? Last spring? Last summer? Last fall? Sox4ever KC had a killer pen. Even with that killer pen t more »
Posted 12/13/2014 11:52:33 EST
Does Larry have any idea how stupid he looks?
Posted 12/12/2014 12:36:12 EST
It's a good start, but this is not going to make me rush out to " Christamas at Fenway. more »
Posted 12/12/2014 06:18:53 EST
In response to ctredsoxfanhugh's comment: In response to croc's comment: [QUOTE] I think they do go after one more pitcher who can lead the staff, but I'm skeptical two more are coming, but I could more »
Posted 12/11/2014 08:33:37 EST
[/QUOTE] I think they do go after one more pitcher who can lead the staff, but I'm skeptical two more are coming, but I could be wrong. Another thing worth noting, that all these moves, and one yea more »
Posted 12/08/2014 05:43:44 EST
In response to J-BAY's comment: In response to moonslav59's comment: [QUOTE] I don't think I have ever seen a minute by minute, blow by blow, reporting on a MLB signing. Sox4ever Ridiculous. Responsib more »
Posted 12/07/2014 12:38:29 EST
Of course the Sox wouldn't wait until Wed to add a starter, they need 2 top of the rotation starters. They can wait until Wed for Lester, however.
Posted 12/07/2014 08:25:57 EST
In response to Beantowne's comment: In response to raider3524's comment: [QUOTE] i think with henry meeting with lester i think henry already knows if lester is going to sign or not...so we can go on more »
Posted 12/06/2014 07:33:42 EST
In response to RedSoxKimmi's comment: Just speculation on my part, but I think that when Larry sticks his nose into baseball ops, something goes terribly wrong. I think that he is a great businessman more »
Posted 12/06/2014 05:55:19 EST
In response to Hfxsoxnut's comment:
And he wisely left Larry at home.
Posted 12/02/2014 04:56:52 EST
One tweeter says it's a no, another says it's likely. Until Lester says it one way or another these guys mean nothing.
Posted 12/02/2014 04:48:57 EST
It was a joke several had reported that he'd be in the present range if he hit free agency. No way is half of what you are worth a real offer.
Posted 12/01/2014 07:30:47 EST
In response to moonslav59's comment: Nobody knows if Lester would have taken $138M/6 or $145M/6 last spring or not. If he was telling the truth about "taking a hometown discount", he'd have looked a b more »
Posted 11/28/2014 05:19:50 EST
In response to fishers5's comment: In response to croc's comment: [QUOTE] It's certainly okay to noncounter a seriously low first offer. The current bid is for twice as much as that offer. You'd cou more »
Posted 11/27/2014 07:40:20 EST
It's certainly okay to noncounter a seriously low first offer. The current bid is for twice as much as that offer. You'd counter a offer that was 50% of what your house is worth? Not me.
Posted 11/26/2014 03:48:15 EST
The work is not even way half done. Maybe wait until they've assembled the team. Right now they need pitching and hav a lot of pieces that are tradeable and more money to spend. Not liking the per more »
Posted 11/26/2014 08:13:28 EST
Heyman posted that both Ramirez and Sandoval have OPSs well above .900 in the playoffs. Hanley might be frustrating at times but they are going to be way better than Crawford.
Posted 11/26/2014 08:04:52 EST
In response to Not-A-Shot's comment: I listened to Wilson and Cusick, Edwards and Goucher. I'll take Fred on TV and Goucher on the radio. I like Edwards because he's fun, not because he's great at h more »
Posted 11/22/2014 12:52:48 EST
Any nut can Tweet, even former MLB pitchers more »
Posted 11/18/2014 05:20:24 EST
Agreed the rotation is #1 priority, but Ben may have very deep pockets. The assumption if they sign him is they'd have enough $$ to add to the front of the rotation. If they sign Panda, and still sign more »
Posted 11/17/2014 04:45:29 EST
Oh great zippo the hippo 2. Get ready for more thrilling afternoons with Fred (Dumber than Dirt) Smerlas and Pupupupuete the Mumumumeat.
Posted 11/10/2014 04:11:30 EST
In response to 2004Idiot's comment: Ken Rosenthal: Hamels would not necessarily reject RedSox, but likely would require any team on no-trade list to pick up his $20 million option for 2019. Just say n more »
Posted 10/27/2014 10:32:51 EDT
Meh worst case the Bruins are seeded 4th instead of 1st or 2nd in the East the reg season is little more than seeding for the Cup, and the Bruins will know a lot about the depth before it's over.
Posted 10/13/2014 06:53:29 EDT
In response to GEAUX-TIGRES' comment: In response to digger0862's comment: Better drafting and better free agent acquisitions would have brought more championships. All of the top teams could say this more »
©2014 Boston Globe Media Partners, LLC
Separate multiple addresses with a comma