wicksandrowe's Page


This member hasn't added any personal information yet.

Leave wicksandrowe a message to find out more.

All Recent Activity

  • Posted 05/19/2015 05:04:56 EDT

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment: Assuming we can't move up and get WCS - I love Dekker.  He may be gone, though. Also like Portis, but how much better would he be than what we have? What would R more »

  • Posted 04/28/2015 11:00:30 EDT

    In response to Petey62's comment: One thing this tells you is that, at some point, you HAVE to have that superstar, that elite player, to win a title. Even if YOU didn't pick him, you need to, by any more »

  • Posted 04/27/2015 08:17:25 EDT

    For some reason I believe that Sullinger is 20-30 pounds away from being a solid power forward with a knack for below the rim points in the paint. And I want to believe he can get his weight and condi more »

  • Posted 04/27/2015 04:58:47 EDT

    For those lamenting the great misfortune of the Celts participating in the playoffs, thus disqualifying themselves from any participation in the lottery and dooming themselves, for now, to picks 16, 2 more »

  • Posted 04/26/2015 05:50:11 EDT

    He was the only "big" who dug in and played, overweight and gasping as he was. 9-17 and 11 boards.   Bass, Zeller, and Olynyk combined for 13 and 8, I believe. Not good, not good at all, but apparentl more »

  • Posted 04/26/2015 05:34:34 EDT

    Observing the recent obsession over getting into the upper reaches of the first roound, it occured to me that there was also a second round. Do you think maybe you might be able to cobble together a d more »

  • Forum Post: Cavs-Celtics

    Posted 04/26/2015 05:18:05 EDT

    In response to FierceBrand's comment: [QUOTE] You clearly don't know what you're talking about. The 10th pick is always better than the 16th pick.   Uh, unh, not always! Language places restrictions o more »

  • Forum Post: #10 versus # 16

    Posted 04/26/2015 05:05:22 EDT

    Come to your own conclusion. Is #10 always better than #16? Looks like it's not that clear-cut at all.   Pierce, J. Johnson, Butler, Jennings and George are obvious. Vucevic also. Maybe Bynum if he st more »

  • Forum Post: Cavs-Celtics

    Posted 04/26/2015 03:31:26 EDT

    Damn! Watching Olynyk is just painful. In a span of 3-4 possessions he fouls, gives up offensive rebounds, misses a baby shot, fouls, all the time wetting his fingers and rubbing them together.

    more »

  • Forum Post: Cavs-Celtics

    Posted 04/26/2015 03:20:55 EDT

    Any one still believe that Bradley is a defensive stopper? 

    more »

  • Forum Post: Cavs-Celtics

    Posted 04/26/2015 02:39:35 EDT

    That's 2 times!  Which Celtics will step up?

    more »

  • Forum Post: Cavs-Celtics

    Posted 04/26/2015 02:30:52 EDT

    Boy, does this make crystal clear what "physically inferior to your opponent" means. Beyond Crowder not one other player has even a physical standoff, let alone a physical advantage.  I'm a big fan of more »

  • Forum Post: Cavs-Celtics

    Posted 04/26/2015 02:10:29 EDT

    How can that not be a flagrantflagrant disqualifying foul? Seriously.

    And where on the roster is there anybody who could even think of smacking Perkins?

    more »

  • Forum Post: Cavs-Celtics

    Posted 04/26/2015 01:51:24 EDT

    Thank you Jae Crowder.

    more »

  • Forum Post: Cavs-Celtics

    Posted 04/26/2015 01:50:54 EDT

    Please restrict Bass to the 16 foot jumper!  And please remove Zeller from the proceedings.

    And please let Thomas hit a shot, any shot!


    more »

  • Forum Post: Cavs-Celtics

    Posted 04/26/2015 01:45:03 EDT

    Bass and Zeller play Laurel and Hardy.

    more »

  • Forum Post: Cavs-Celtics

    Posted 04/26/2015 01:42:31 EDT

    ZELLER!  Man, I don't care that he can make floaters from 2-5 feet. He just accidentally came into possession of a rebound, totally relaxed, and Irving just knocked it out of his hands. Happens all th more »

  • Posted 04/24/2015 11:51:57 EDT

    In response to FierceBrand's comment: Just use common sense. Whatever the reason, this June's draft has two potential franchise player type big men. But the Celts opted to make the playoffs.   Some of more »

  • Posted 04/24/2015 01:13:34 EDT

    In response to maryngary's comment:   Clueless Celtic Cheerleader  Easy to pick out poor plays caused sometimes by our lock down defenders getting beat, you should at least point out how Zeller played more »

  • Posted 04/24/2015 11:11:50 EDT

    Please! AGAIN, it happened again, and even Celtic players can barely disguise their frustration that not one, not two, not three of our 'bigs' can keep this guy off the glass. At about 2:23 Thompson s more »

  • Posted 04/23/2015 09:36:19 EDT

    Thank you, Tyler Zeller!  Just an awful, awful, awful, awful performance. A 7 footer who plays with his arms by his side!


    more »

  • Posted 04/23/2015 08:37:27 EDT

    Missed shots, bad shots, turnovers. Too many empty possessions is the problem. Defending and rebounding are okay but you can't win shooting 38%.  

    more »

  • Posted 04/23/2015 07:21:56 EDT

    ZELLER!  Wouldn't get n front of Mozgov rolling, got deked out of his shoes by Mozgov's jab step and left for a hoop and then baby-fouls him, and misses a 4-footer short. Come on!

    more »

  • Posted 04/23/2015 03:58:37 EDT

    In response to jtkl's comment: In response to wicksandrowe's comment: When the two point guards are the leading rebounders with 7 and 5 boards each (and one of them is 5'9"!), there is something very, more »

  • Posted 04/23/2015 01:15:18 EDT

    In response to FierceBrand's comment: Celts would've been better off ending up with Jahlil Okafor or Karl Towns. Oh, I see. And at what cost? You would create the nucleus for a vibrant, winning NBA te more »