BSHockeyParent's Page

BSHockeyParent

This member hasn't added any personal information yet.


Leave BSHockeyParent a message to find out more.

All Recent Activity

  • Posted 03/05/2012 11:30:50 EST

    In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012: [QUOTE]Huh, surprising a Walpole loss and the first line complaining about the refs-what a surprise!!Falmouth got an ugly goal which never happens to W more »

  • Posted 03/05/2012 11:22:42 EST

    In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012: [QUOTE]go beez, you are an A-clown if you applaud an adult for kicking a kid who was walking away from her. Posted by HockeyDad70[/QUOTE] beez is a A-C more »

  • Posted 03/04/2012 01:29:26 EST

    Who votes the MIAA board in?  Is it the ADs? more »

  • Posted 03/03/2012 11:19:29 EST

    In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012: [QUOTE]Belmont - Norwood game is in Franklin. BTW, what is with the crappy venues for the girl's quarter finals?  Two old sh*tty rinks with poor siteli more »

  • Posted 03/03/2012 07:01:55 EST

    If I'm from Belmont I'm not happy.  How Canton is a neutral site?  Its Norwood's home rink.   more »

  • Posted 03/02/2012 06:03:46 EST

    In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012 : I'll apologize. I was a Winthrop parent for the last 3 years...daughter moved on. You sit ther more »

  • Posted 03/02/2012 03:54:00 EST

    In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012: [QUOTE]Ouch this is a sticky one, since it could also be used for setting precedents in related cases.  When does cheering for your team tilt over the more »

  • Posted 03/02/2012 09:53:07 EST

    bwc1904 - 2nd offense for that team??  Probably the same parent.  what a lowlife.  Just when you thought you'd heard it all. agee with Rocket.  replay game neutral site.  If goalie was my daughter, I' more »

  • Posted 02/24/2012 10:53:07 EST

    In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012 : Good, looks like the MV-Westwood game could have impact in D2 as well.  If Westwood loses look more »

  • Posted 02/24/2012 10:47:05 EST

    In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012 : That was not a meaningless contest for Canton.  With the win they are now tied for the 11 seed more »

  • Posted 02/23/2012 09:09:28 EST

    In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012: [QUOTE]I was guesssing it might be something like that.  Woburn scores a lot on odd man rushes and counters and steals.  While they have some superior more »

  • Posted 02/22/2012 05:59:50 EST

    In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012 : BS - Sorry to hear that your kid is on a lousy team team! Posted by Go Beez[/QUOTE] you know w more »

  • Posted 02/21/2012 10:32:26 EST

    In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012 : BS - Sorry to hear that your kid is on a lousy team team! Posted by Go Beez[/QUOTE] beez - wha more »

  • Posted 02/21/2012 06:39:30 EST

    In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012: [QUOTE]I think Belmont surprises everyone and goes to finals and upsets Duxbury. Stong team that has played some very good teams and proven they can co more »

  • Posted 02/21/2012 06:29:29 EST

    In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012 : Bruce - I cannot argue with the first six and the order of them - might swap 1/2, or 3/4 but t more »

  • Posted 02/21/2012 06:24:06 EST

    Beez - how do you really feel about D1 v D2.  You are like an annoying 6 year old who just doesn't know when to stop.  I should do the research but my gut tells me that 9 out of 10 or your posts compl more »

  • Posted 02/20/2012 12:35:49 EST

    In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012 : Yes, Duxbury is overrated in all but the masshshockey.com ratings.  I was 25% right!  They wer more »

  • Posted 02/20/2012 11:29:51 EST

    In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012: [QUOTE]all about the title and winning not the compeitition Posted by hockeydad2012[/QUOTE] Sleeper and Hockeydad, you guys are all killing me.  They c more »

  • Posted 02/19/2012 10:39:08 EST

    Its been said before but I'll repeat it.  The best in D2 can compete with the best in D1.  I think they should eliminate the Divisions.   From what I see there are 79 teams combined in D1/D2.  This ye more »

  • Posted 02/17/2012 06:31:18 EST

    In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012 : Ursuline is in, as is Notre Dame Academy by virtue of a 3-way tie atop Catholic Conference wit more »

  • Posted 02/15/2012 11:10:05 EST

    Pete - I see your point but I think the kids know their stats regardless.  I guess you can make the argument that if its not published then you remove the "publicity" incentive but my opinion is they more »

  • Posted 02/15/2012 08:29:07 EST

    Herald Bracketology out.  Go to Heralds "In the slot"  http://bostonherald.com/blogs/sports/in_the_slot  check the right side menus And what's up with Norwood?  Coach O'Donnell doesn't post any stats more »

  • Posted 02/13/2012 09:40:56 EST

    In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012: [QUOTE]In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012 : Who is Bill? I believe the poster signed his post as "Bruce". Anyway, I too would like to unde more »

  • Posted 02/13/2012 08:02:49 EST

    In Response to Re: EMASS Girls Hockey 2011-2012: [QUOTE]Funny, I had the same question. I have never heard of this before...always thought it was based on the school size/attendance. Thanks Bill. What more »

  • Posted 02/13/2012 06:35:19 EST

    Thanks Bill.  Can you shed light on your comment regarding D2 and finances?  Its more expensive to play D1?  Why?


    Thanks 
    more »

Sections
Shortcuts

Share