Boston.com/Health BLOG: White Coat Notes

Calorie restriction may not extend monkeys’ lives after all, new study suggests

E-mail this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

08/29/2012 6:00 PM
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

Here’s some upsetting news for those following calorie-restricted diets in the hope that they’ll live longer: it doesn’t appear to extend lifespan, at least in monkeys, according to a National Institute of Aging study published Wednesday in the journal Nature. That’s comforting for the rest of us who may not want the frequent hunger pangs, chills, and gaunt-looking body common to those who have reduced their calorie intake by up to 30 percent for years or decades.

The latest study certainly doesn’t provide a firm answer to the question of whether calorie restriction helps us live longer. In fact, it contradicts a 2009 study from the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center, which found that monkeys put on a calorie-restricted diet lived longer and healthier lives.

But that earlier study may have had some shortcomings: The monkeys were all fed relatively unhealthy diets, with nearly one-third of their calories from sugar, so the calorie-restricted monkeys may have been healthier and lived longer simply because they ate less sugar.

In contrast, the monkeys in the new trial ate only 4 percent of their calories from sugar, regardless of whether they were on a calorie-restricted or normal diet used for comparison. All of the monkeys were also fed fish oil and other nutrients that were lacking in the Wisconsin study, and, as a group, they wound up weighing less, on average, compared with the Wisconsin monkeys who had more body fat.

Genetics may have also played a role because monkeys in the two different studies didn’t come from the same countries.

In the latest study, some of the monkeys on the calorie-restricted diets enjoyed some health benefits over their counterparts. Male monkeys, though not females, who started eating fewer calories in old age had lower levels of cholesterol and blood sugar, and both genders had lower levels of triglycerides which may have protected them against heart disease.

Those monkeys who were put on the lower calorie diet when they were young didn’t have these benefits, though they didn’t had lower rates of cancer. This, however, didn’t help them live any longer.

“These results suggest the complexity of how calorie restriction may work in the body,” Aging Institute director Dr. Richard J. Hodes said in a statement. “Calorie restriction’s effects likely depend on a variety of factors, including environment, nutritional components and genetics.”

Deborah Kotz can be reached at dkotz@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @debkotz2.

  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

about the blog

Daily Dose gives you the latest consumer health news and advice from Boston-area experts. Deborah Kotz is a former reporter for US News and World Report. Write her at dailydose@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter at @debkotz2.

Do supplements prevent eye diseases?
Lots of supplements tout benefits for the eyes, but there's perhaps only one case where scientific evidence supports taking supplements for eye disease.
Submit a question

Health&Wellness video

Health search

Find news and information on:
Follow us on Facebook
archives
Health Events
health resources

Be Well Boston on Twitter

    waiting for twitterWaiting for twitter.com to feed in the latest...
contributors
Gideon Gil, Health and Science Editor
Elizabeth Comeau, Senior Health Producer
Liz Kowalczyk
Kay Lazar
other health blogs