Home
Help

Latest News

Related Coverage

Antitrust suit
US takes on Microsoft -05/19/98

Background

Key dates in the antitrust investigation of Microsoft Corp.

Related Links

Boston.com
Windows 98, is it
worth the wait?

- 04/98

The DOJ's case

  • Chronology
  • Initial complaint
  • Ruling on complaint
  • Contempt charge
  • Antitrust suit

    Microsoft's case

  • Chronology
  • Legal documents
  • On competition
  • On innovation
  • Consumer statement

    Microsoft profile

  • Stock quotes
  • Corporate info

    Netscape profile

  • Stock quotes
  • Corporate info

    Latest News
    Latest business news
    Latest high-tech news

    Market Watch Dow:
    [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    NASDAQ:
    [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    S&P 500:
    [an error occurred while processing this directive]

    Stock quotes:

    [ Look up symbol ]

    Quotes courtesy of PC Financial Network. More extensive market data available from Boston.com

    Columnists
    Kenneth Hooker
    Charles A. Jaffe
    Joan Vennochi
    David Warsh

    Related features
    Boston Capital
    Plugged In
    Boston.com Business
    The 9th annual Globe 100


    Click here for a table of contents and a list of special online features

    Search/Archives

    Search the Globe:

    Today
    Yesterday


    Sections Boston Globe Online: Page One Nation | World Metro | Region Business Sports Living | Arts Editorials Columnists Calendar Discussion Forums Classifieds Extranet Archives

    Low-graphics version

  • The Boston Globe OnlineBoston.com Boston Globe Online / Business
    The Microsoft probe

    What the DOJ must do to win their case against Microsoft

    Associated Press, 05/18/98

    T o win its antitrust case against Microsoft Corp., the government must prove that the software giant illegally used its monopoly powers to stifle competition and hurt consumers.

    PROOF OF MONOPOLY: The government must first prove that Microsoft owns a monopoly in operating systems, the software that runs desktop computers. Microsoft's Windows software currently runs 90 percent of the world's computers. But being a monopoly is not in itself an offense.

    ABUSING MONOPOLY POWER: If the government can prove that Microsoft monopolizes the software business, the key question is whether the company used that power to muscle into the market for Internet browser software. In addition to squeezing competitors, it must be shown that Microsoft hurt consumers by limiting their choices.

    The government must prove that Microsoft required PC makers to license and install its Internet Explore browser as a condition of loading Windows 95, and that Microsoft intended to use the same tactic in the Windows 98 version. Microsoft has said the browser is now a vital part of Windows 98 and cannot be removed.

    If it is proved that Microsoft used its leverage in operating systems to make PC companies carry Internet Explorer, it would be a violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. That law was founded in 1890 to stop corporate giants of that era from forming ``trusts'' to buy competitors, force others out of business and raise prices.


    Click here for advertiser information

    © Copyright 1998 Globe Newspaper Company
    Boston Globe Extranet
    Extending our newspaper services to the web
    Return to the home page
    of The Globe Online