'); //--> Back to Boston.com homepage Arts | Entertainment Boston Globe Online Cars.com BostonWorks Real Estate Boston.com Sports digitalMass Travel
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
The Boston Globe OnlineBoston.com Boston Globe Online / Archives

EASY PASS | PAST BIG DIG COVERAGE

Officials disclose more Big Dig defects

Fire alarms, road surfaces need fix

By Raphael Lewis, Globe Staff, 02/01/2002

   
 THE SERIES

PART ONE
Bechtel's mistakes drive up cost overruns, and company profits.

Graphics
Bechtel's fee overruns
Map of major conflicts
History of the contract
Contract modifications
Cross section of roadway
Construction cost overruns


PART TWO
State officials overlook and excuse Bechtel's mistakes for a decade.

Graphic
Cost recoveries initiated


PART THREE
Powerfull allies help protect Bechtel and its bottom line.

 FOLLOW-UPS

This series has generated strong response from the state, the public, and Globe columnists.
More Globe coverage

 GLOBE DEFENSE OF SERIES

On Feb. 20, 2003, Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff issued a document disputing the findings of the "Easy Pass" series. Globe editor Martin Baron responded with a defense of the Globe's reporting.
Read Bechtel's statement
Read the Globe's statement

 PHOTO GALLERY

Building a reputation
Bechtel has never shied away from big construction projects, but worldwide achievements are accompanied by controversy.
See past Bechtel projects

 FROM THE ARCHIVES

2001
Review cites flaws at Big Dig
Cerasoli charges Big Dig coverup
$1.4b overrun known in '99
Firm rejects call to offset costs
'99 memos warned of tunnel leaks

2002
Officials disclose more defects
Lawsuit raises Big Dig questions
State to reopen deal with Bechtel
Big Dig hires quality manager
US knew of hidden expenses
Big Dig overrun just plain big
SEC probers to target Big Dig
Big Dig review to target overruns
Turnpike, firm set deal on leak cost

2003
Contracts to be reviewed

 RELATED LINKS

Central Artery/Tunnel Project
www.bigdig.com

Bechtel
www.bechtel.com

Parsons Brinckerhoff
www.pbworld.com

State Inspector General reports
On the history of the Central Artery/Tunnel project's finances:
www.state.ma.us/ig/publ/cat01ex.htm
On the Central Artery/Tunnel project's attempts to recover money for mistakes:
www.state.ma.us/ig/publ/catcrex.htm

About "Scheme Z" bridge design
libraries.mit.edu/rotch/artery/

State oversight of the Big Dig
www.state.ma.us/catocc/

Mass. Turnpike Authority
www.massturnpike.com

The Artery Business Committee
www.arterybusiness.com

 ONLINE CHAT

On February 11, 2003, Globe reporter Raphael Lewis chatted with Boston.com readers about the Bechtel series.
Transcript of chat

 CONTACT THE GLOBE

Any tips? Let us know.
Phone: 617-929-3379
E-mail: bigdigtips@globe.com

 MORE BOSTON.COM COVERAGE


Beyond the Big Dig   What happens to the ribbon of land being created by the depression of the Central Artery? A joint effort between The Boston Globe, MIT, and WCVB-TV explores.
A special report


Progress updates on the Big Dig. Info
 


entral Artery officials, stung by press reports highlighting construction flaws and potential lapses in the Big Dig's quality assurance program, detailed a series of previously undisclosed glitches yesterday in an effort to prove the success of the important project.

Nevertheless, officials revealed at least one construction defect, stemming from the rush to open the Ted Williams Tunnel in December 1995, that Massachusetts taxpayers will pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to repair.

The problems, which include substandard fire alarms in the Ted Williams Tunnel, several stretches of flawed road surface, and peeling blue paint on 330 lampposts, were detected and are being dealt with "exactly as they should," project director Michael Lewis said.

"We will make mistakes, and there will be dozens of issues between now and the end of the project," Lewis said. "The point is that we feel we have the right nets in place to catch these issues to, number one, prevent any safety issues, and number two, ensure that the Commonwealth's taxpayers get the product they paid for."

Nearly all of the newly revealed problems, which were discovered by field engineers with the project's management consultant, Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff, are likely to be fixed by summer's end, Lewis said.

Most of the defective work, minor compared to the size of the $14.5 billion project, will be repaired at no cost to taxpayers, which Lewis claimed is a testament to the quality assurance program's effectiveness.

He also credited Bechtel/Parsons, which some state lawmakers and others have accused of failing to identify and repair problems in a timely fashion.

The public will pay for the repairs involving problematic concrete road overlays installed late in 1995 near the Ted Williams Tunnel toll booths, officials acknowledged. The overlays, designed to make road surfaces stronger and less prone to damage from salt, never properly adhered to the surface below and must be replaced. Similar problems exist in small patches on the new elevated portion of Interstate 93 Southbound, on the South Boston bypass road, and on a ramp leading to the Ted Williams Tunnel.

While the other repairs will be funded by the contractors who installed them, taxpayers will pay for work on about 400-square feet of problematic pavement on the westbound ramp.

The cause of the problem, officials said, is simple: the temperature was too cold for the overlay to properly adhere to the underlying surface, but work pressed ahead anyway in the rush to open the tunnel on time.

Repair costs will not exceed $1 million, officials said, but they did not regret opening the road despite the cold weather.

"You make a decision weighing the value of opening this thing to the public versus the risk of the surface application problem," Lewis said. "Is it worth the risk of X number of dollars to save multiple times that? That was the thinking."

Another area where the "latex modified concrete" overlay is detaching itself is around the toll booths. That area is far larger, officials said, but analysis shows that the contractor responsible, the joint venture of Modern Continental/Obayashi, did not properly apply a subsurface.

Taxpayers may pay for some of that problem, too, project spokesman Sean O'Neill acknowledged, because some of the flaws may also be tied to the hastened tunnel ribbon-cutting: "We could end up sharing the cost."

Peter Donahue, the Central Artery/Tunnel project's area design manager, said the areas will most likely get repaired when warmer weather returns.

Donahue and O'Neill denied that the repairs have been late in coming, even though the problems were first detected soon after the Dec. 15, 1995, tunnel opening, which many say was hastened to bolster former Governor William F. Weld's campaign for US Senate.

"If there are other milestones to reach that are more important, [the contractors] go ahead and do that," O'Neill said. "You don't stop building the entire house if the mailbox is broken. You evaluate it based on importance."

As for the substandard fire alarms in the Williams Tunnel, officials said the devices work fine and pose no risk to the public. However, contract specifications called for the alarms to work in subfreezing temperatures. Because Underwriters Laboratories Inc., which rates the alarms, does not test for such conditions, the contractors simply installed alarms that met the other specifications, Lewis said. Now, the contractor must encase the devices to protect them from the elements.

Officials acknowledged that the Tunnel's electronic traffic sensors, which are used to detect jam-ups and accidents, also do not work. Those will be fixed shortly.

This story ran on page B2 in the Metro/Region section of the Boston Globe on 02/01/2002.
© Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.


 Search the Globe
 Search for:  
Today Yesterday Past month Past year   Advanced Search

© Copyright 2003 New York Times Company
| Advertise | Contact us | Privacy policy |