'); //--> Back to Boston.com homepage Arts | Entertainment Boston Globe Online Cars.com BostonWorks Real Estate Boston.com Sports digitalMass Travel
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
The Boston Globe OnlineBoston.com Boston Globe Online / Archives

EASY PASS | PAST BIG DIG COVERAGE

Big Dig review to target cost overruns

By Sean Murphy, Globe Staff, 11/23/2002

   
 THE SERIES

PART ONE
Bechtel's mistakes drive up cost overruns, and company profits.

Graphics
Bechtel's fee overruns
Map of major conflicts
History of the contract
Contract modifications
Cross section of roadway
Construction cost overruns


PART TWO
State officials overlook and excuse Bechtel's mistakes for a decade.

Graphic
Cost recoveries initiated


PART THREE
Powerfull allies help protect Bechtel and its bottom line.

 FOLLOW-UPS

This series has generated strong response from the state, the public, and Globe columnists.
More Globe coverage

 GLOBE DEFENSE OF SERIES

On Feb. 20, 2003, Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff issued a document disputing the findings of the "Easy Pass" series. Globe editor Martin Baron responded with a defense of the Globe's reporting.
Read Bechtel's statement
Read the Globe's statement

 PHOTO GALLERY

Building a reputation
Bechtel has never shied away from big construction projects, but worldwide achievements are accompanied by controversy.
See past Bechtel projects

 FROM THE ARCHIVES

2001
Review cites flaws at Big Dig
Cerasoli charges Big Dig coverup
$1.4b overrun known in '99
Firm rejects call to offset costs
'99 memos warned of tunnel leaks

2002
Officials disclose more defects
Lawsuit raises Big Dig questions
State to reopen deal with Bechtel
Big Dig hires quality manager
US knew of hidden expenses
Big Dig overrun just plain big
SEC probers to target Big Dig
Big Dig review to target overruns
Turnpike, firm set deal on leak cost

2003
Contracts to be reviewed

 RELATED LINKS

Central Artery/Tunnel Project
www.bigdig.com

Bechtel
www.bechtel.com

Parsons Brinckerhoff
www.pbworld.com

State Inspector General reports
On the history of the Central Artery/Tunnel project's finances:
www.state.ma.us/ig/publ/cat01ex.htm
On the Central Artery/Tunnel project's attempts to recover money for mistakes:
www.state.ma.us/ig/publ/catcrex.htm

About "Scheme Z" bridge design
libraries.mit.edu/rotch/artery/

State oversight of the Big Dig
www.state.ma.us/catocc/

Mass. Turnpike Authority
www.massturnpike.com

The Artery Business Committee
www.arterybusiness.com

 ONLINE CHAT

On February 11, 2003, Globe reporter Raphael Lewis chatted with Boston.com readers about the Bechtel series.
Transcript of chat

 CONTACT THE GLOBE

Any tips? Let us know.
Phone: 617-929-3379
E-mail: bigdigtips@globe.com

 MORE BOSTON.COM COVERAGE


Beyond the Big Dig   What happens to the ribbon of land being created by the depression of the Central Artery? A joint effort between The Boston Globe, MIT, and WCVB-TV explores.
A special report


Progress updates on the Big Dig. Info
 


he Big Dig's top official yesterday agreed to work with the state Inspector General's office in a comprehensive review of the $14.6 billion Central Artery/Tunnel Project, with an eye toward recouping from contractors some portion of the billions of dollars in cost overruns rung up on the project so far.

One of the prime objectives of the planned review will be to determine whether the private-sector project manager, Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff, which has received more than $1 billion in fees, made mistakes for which the state should be reimbursed.

Inspector General Greg Sullivan, whose office has tracked Big Dig costs for several years, asked in a letter dated Thursday for the cooperation of Matthew Amorello, chairman of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, which oversees the project.

"This office intends to work with the Turnpike Authority to conduct a top-to-bottom review," Sullivan said yesterday. "For the benefit of taxpayers, this needs to be done."

Sullivan said he had not received a personal reply from Amorello, who is a relative newcomer to the Big Dig, having ascended to the position of chairman in February. But in an interview late yesterday, Amorello said he was willing to undertake the review with Sullivan's office.

"We're at the final stages of this long project and it's appropriate to now get geared up to take a close look at the state's potential to recover any costs," he said.

Amorello said he expected to meet with Sullivan soon to formalize an approach. He said the Inspector General's office has the advantage of subpoena power, which means it can compel the release of documents from private companies, such as Bechtel.

Amorello declined to comment on specific potential issues with Bechtel, but Sullivan, in his letter, said, "Based on anecdotal evidence, I believe that there is a genuine potential for monetary recovery."

In recent weeks, Amorello said, Turnpike lawyers assigned to the project have begun sorting through the massive paperwork covering the 15-year-old project to evaluate Bechtel's performance.

Besides Bechtel, Amorello and Sullivan say they will scrutinize the performance of other contractors, including two dozen design firms hired at a cost of $1 billion to do the project's final design.

The state, meanwhile, is already engaged in negotiations with construction contractors over what share of cost overruns are the responsibility of the construction contractors.

The project's price has risen from $10.8 billion in 2000 to $14.6 billion today.

Andrew Paven, a spokesman for Bechtel, declined to address the company's position on whether it owes the state anything. "There is a contractual process for looking at these things and we have said we will never shrink from our responsibilities," he said.

At stake is millions of dollars in potential savings for state taxpayers. The federal government in 2000 reacted to the latest in a series of cost escalations by saying it would cut off further funding of the project, leaving the state taxpayers to finance at least $6 billion of the project on their own.

In 2000, the Inspector General's office released a report critical of the project's performance in holding contractors accountable for mistakes.

"Although the project is winding down, nearly 70 percent of project costs are still within the statute of limitations for possible legal action regarding cost recovery," Sullivan wrote in Thursday's letter. "This opportunity must be acted on expeditiously.

"The commonwealth should not unfairly bear the costs and the blame for all the project's monetary problems," the letter said.

Sullivan said such a review would take about a year, and require the hiring of expert consultants in law, engineering, and construction. He said the cost of the review would be the Turnpike Authority's.

This story ran on page A1 in the Metro/Region section of the Boston Globe on 11/23/2002.
© Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.


 Search the Globe
 Search for:  
Today Yesterday Past month Past year   Advanced Search

© Copyright 2003 New York Times Company
| Advertise | Contact us | Privacy policy |